×

Message

Please login first

Backcountry Pilot • Aqua 3190s

Aqua 3190s

Information and discussion about seaplanes, float planes, and water operations.
24 postsPage 2 of 21, 2

Re: Aqua 3190s

This appears to be the new solution available soon. Gotta be better than wood. Mine look a lot like yours - including the deck bolts.

77022543585__ED35E13B-45ED-4DE4-876E-F1E477E69284.jpeg
soyAnarchisto offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 1975
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:23 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Aircraft: 1955 Cessna 180

Re: Aqua 3190s

Very nice! I recommend shooting the interior of those spreaders with your favorite flavor of corrosion preventive compound. I employ the CorrosionX line and the "Heavy" is what I use in applications such as this. In an attempt to seal the spreaders, (near impossible), "sweating" caused by condensation, and its inability to gas off leads to corrosion. Corrosion control products displace moisture, no moisture, no corrosion. When in storage, open the spreader bar end covers to allow air circulation and remove all hatch covers for same reason. Removing the wood and replacing with a closed cell type of poly obviously eliminates a large moisture reservoir.

TR
TR offline
User avatar
Posts: 150
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 10:08 am
Location: Hudson Valley
Aircraft: PA-18A
C-180H
DHC-2
G-164 Ag Cat

Re: Aqua 3190s

Has anyone had a problem with the tips of the floats digging in on floats made in 6/1986. Did the floats undergo a change in design to avoid this problem before or after 1986? and since I just acquired a set in excellent condition, is this going to be a problem installed on a C180K-1977 model. Much heavier than the earlier 180's. thanks
wolfcreek20 offline
User avatar
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2019 3:39 pm
Location: Pagosa Springs
Aircraft: Cessna 180C Skywagon

Re: Aqua 3190s

wolfcreek20 wrote:Has anyone had a problem with the tips of the floats digging in on floats made in 6/1986. Did the floats undergo a change in design to avoid this problem before or after 1986? and since I just acquired a set in excellent condition, is this going to be a problem installed on a C180K-1977 model. Much heavier than the earlier 180's. thanks


I previously ran Aqua 180-85's AKA 3190's under our 180H with Kenmore up gross (approved via FA for up gross with 3190's vice the EDO 2960 as stipulated in STC). I had no issues with "dig". As for your question of "is this going to be a problem?", it depends. At some point Aqua did change the design of the keelsons from an enclosed extrusion to a simple angle (see attached photo of the latter). They also changed the length of the rear strut resulting in a change in the angle of incidence between the wing chord and the float keel. This is the parameter (along with pilot technique) that has the greatest effect on forward deceleration caused by increased wetted surface at touchdown. The other parameter is the forward upper attach fitting AKA the porkchop. Using an EDO porkchop (yes, they fit the AQUA struts just fine) also reduces the float to wing AOI resulting in less tendency to "dig" as the EDO porkchop is shorter (photo attached). Note that decreasing the AOI typically results in longer takeoff runs, but better cruise. The inverse is also true.

I suggest flying it and see how it behaves. The good news is that most behavior issues can be improved with slight modification. Terry and Helen Clagett sold Aqua and since I sold my Aqua floats, I had no need to follow up on the new owner/s. They or Helen may be helpful as far as history of modifications. Another source is Levi at PK Floats. There is a reason Aqua and PK's appear very similar.

TR
Image
Image
TR offline
User avatar
Posts: 150
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2023 10:08 am
Location: Hudson Valley
Aircraft: PA-18A
C-180H
DHC-2
G-164 Ag Cat

DISPLAY OPTIONS

Previous
24 postsPage 2 of 21, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base