Thu Nov 23, 2017 10:21 pm
If anyone knows of a potential source, please forward them the link to the IAA, or just alert the Source to the issue and then contact the IAA and have them contact the Source.
This isn't about somebody's merit badge...it's about documenting historical usage so the airstrips don't get closed. The IAA wouldn't be asking for it if they didn't feel it was needed.
Frankly I think the Big 4 are essentially doomed: too little use for Backcountry Trailhead access, too much use as an aerial skatepark.
When we loose the Big 4 airstrips we can all thank the pilots of the various Johnson Creek Fly-In's: Twenty airplanes in a small drainage doing nothing but landing and taking off so they can say they went there... Legal, yes. Defendable in the context of airstrips grandfathered into the Wilderness Act...No, not at all.
If we don't loose the Big 4 it will be because there are pilots who can document using them as something other than log-book entries: Access for hunters, fishermen, backpackers, botanists, geologists, environmentalists, ecologists, sociologists...freaking cannibals for Christ's sake...just prove there's a use for them other than for pilots who want to wag their dicks on the internet.
Very few of the folks who visit Big Creek are pilots, or passengers in an airplane. Their interpretation of the how pilots utilize the drainage is as valid as anyone's, and more valid than most. And frankly, the way pilots have been using the drainage is, by in large, not in line with the intended use...as backcountry trailheads.
There's two things we as backcountry pilots can do: prove historical usage, and only use the airstrips in the manner in which they were intended: If you land there, stay there 10 or 20 or 80 hours. If you can't do that, don't land.