Backcountry Pilot • Confidence vs. personal limitations.

Confidence vs. personal limitations.

Share tips, techniques, or anything else related to flying.
28 postsPage 2 of 21, 2

Re: Confidence vs. personal limitations.

Dog is my Copilot wrote:
contactflying wrote:John Boyd, "Do you want to be (group 2) or do (group 1)?" NineThreeKilo or JP256, you need to start a thread on LODA. I am not that familiar with that, mx, and the P40 instruction "letter" I guess. I have been talking generalities and you guys are talking about a specific incident, I think.


This may be thread drift but since it is being brought up: The LODA (Letter of deviation authority) was created as a short term workaround after the court made the ruling for limited, experimental, and primary aircraft. The LODA only applies to experimental aircraft. It has been in effect since July 12, 2021. It is a short term workaround to the mess created by this judge and ruling. I have heard the FAA needing 1-2 days to approve them and at this point is just a formality. You can either have the airplane or CFI obtain the LODA. I am going to need the LODA because I plan on flying a Glastar Sportsman with my friend who is new to tailwheels. I have zero time in the Glastar Sportsman and my friend is an airline pilot who just wants some help learning how to wheel land. There apparently is no specific prior training needed for the LODA - just the form and application.

https://www.faa.gov/licenses_certificat ... mplate.pdf.

This particular court also brought up the idea that flight instruction may require a class II medical because the instructor would be receiving compensation for flying. The court deemed "flight time" as a form of compensation for those instructors not charging for their time. Hopefully the FAA will make a separate ruling on this issue with new specific language regarding this court ruling. Older retired pilots make great instructors and many can only qualify under basic medical. So the court ruling could have an impact on future training. AOPA and EAA have both gotten involved. For now you can still teach with Basic Medical and charge for instruction. Lastly, I have always assumed that the highest timed and most experienced pilot in the airplane is ultimately responsible for the safety of the flight and will be deemed PIC if there is an incident/accident.



Josh


I have personal experience with people who applied for the LODA right off the batt and are STILL waiting. I have also been told by ASIs; BOTH the CFI and the owner need a LODA, well they didn’t say needed but recommend it, they can’t even make heads or tails of this bed they shat

I wouldn’t put this on the judge, he a blunt tool who didn’t know what he was doing aviation wise, to a hammer everything looks like a nail, and he made the “safe” call to side with fellow government. This was simply the FAA having to win even when their own rules said they didn’t have a winning case, so they changed the rules.

And I agree, the amount of VERY experienced instructors who’ll just say “F it” if they now have to up their medical status is a HUGE hit to folks who want more training or to become better pilots from learning from those with the most experience, wonder if this will do anything for all the super experienced instructors at flight safety who don’t have medicals anymore.


Didn’t think it was too much of a drift seeing it’s directly related to training and safety
NineThreeKilo offline
Retired
Posts: 1679
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:16 pm
Location: _

Re: Confidence vs. personal limitations.

Thanks Josh. I don't mind thread drift and I learned something. When pieces of the windscreen on a 172 took my right eyesight, I feared keeping class II medical. That was soon after my flight surgeon quit because computer was required and I couldn't afford expensive waiver. I had enough trouble with light sport instruction that I quit charging and just rode with pilots in all.

Safety before becoming embroiled in technicalities is a big leap for the FAA, but at least someone had the common sense to provide you guys a workaround.

Improving training is such a massive bureaucratic effort for the FAA. It will take a John Boyd to "do" and not "be" in that area. Teacher has such low status in public school education that most just "do". How do we incorporate that into flight instruction.?
contactflying offline
Posts: 4972
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:36 pm
Location: Aurora, Missouri 2H2
Download my free "https://tinyurl.com/Safe-Maneuvering" e-book.

Re: Confidence vs. personal limitations.

contactflying wrote:Thanks Josh. I don't mind thread drift and I learned something. When pieces of the windscreen on a 172 took my right eyesight, I feared keeping class II medical. That was soon after my flight surgeon quit because computer was required and I couldn't afford expensive waiver. I had enough trouble with light sport instruction that I quit charging and just rode with pilots in all.

Safety before becoming embroiled in technicalities is a big leap for the FAA, but at least someone had the common sense to provide you guys a workaround.

Improving training is such a massive bureaucratic effort for the FAA. It will take a John Boyd to "do" and not "be" in that area. Teacher has such low status in public school education that most just "do". How do we incorporate that into flight instruction.?


Man, I’m sorry to hear that, bird strike?

Basic med?

I knows this has all probably been covered before
NineThreeKilo offline
Retired
Posts: 1679
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:16 pm
Location: _

Re: Confidence vs. personal limitations.

Yes, covered before. Brenco Aerial Patrol 172. Owner would not let mechanic drill stop and safety wire lace a hairline crack well out of line of vision (legal fix). Airplanes had immaculate paperwork, every one of them a pile of junk. Almost had the airplane on fire that day from an exhaust stack crack the mechanic would not weld because it was an illegally long crack. Owner budgeted replacement parts. I didn't have enough hours on that stack for replacement. The smoke and smell from scorched paint got me started to the nearest airport before the windscreen came out. I was about to cross northern Louisiana swamps, but went into Magnolia, Arkansas.

We carried a manual of shop prices Brenco would pay for maintenance. When shop mechanics saw a Red and Grey (Ohio State colors, airplanes looked immaculate outside and new plastic regularly inside) 172 or 182 pull up, they just went back to work. I would pull the cowl and whatever inspection plates necessary for them to do whatever I needed done. Then they would wander out.

MTV, I missed your advice about not holding onto CFII. It is not active, I think. When I sent my several thousand pages of Mercy Hospital paperwork with application for waiver, they Emergency Suspended my Commercial. Nothing said about the CFI. Should I send them the CFI or just let it die? My crash was in 2009. I had an AOPA lawyer and did what he said to do by sending them the Commercial. The CFI says on it "VALID ONLY WHEN ACCOMPANIED BY PILOT CERTIFICATE NO. 1596367. EXPIRES: 31 OCT 2012. I just kept it for sentimental reasons. I could go into protective custody, but I think it's too late for that.
contactflying offline
Posts: 4972
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:36 pm
Location: Aurora, Missouri 2H2
Download my free "https://tinyurl.com/Safe-Maneuvering" e-book.

Re: Confidence vs. personal limitations.

contactflying wrote:MTV, I missed your advice about not holding onto CFII. It is not active, I think. When I sent my several thousand pages of Mercy Hospital paperwork with application for waiver, they Emergency Suspended my Commercial. Nothing said about the CFI. Should I send them the CFI or just let it die? My crash was in 2009. I had an AOPA lawyer and did what he said to do by sending them the Commercial. The CFI says on it "VALID ONLY WHEN ACCOMPANIED BY PILOT CERTIFICATE NO. 1596367. EXPIRES: 31 OCT 2012. I just kept it for sentimental reasons. I could go into protective custody, but I think it's too late for that.


If you held a CFI/CFII and let it lapse you just need to reactivate it. If you are interested in instructing again it just means scheduling with a DPE. Once reactivated it will give you both CFI/II privileges (whatever instructor ratings you had previously). I let mine lapse and reactivated in November of 2020. I studied super hard thinking it was going to be a hard checkride similar to my CFI initial. I was definitely over-prepared. Passing that ride reactivated my CFI/II and MEI. I haven't flown a twin in 20+ years but I have multi teaching privileges now. You can take the checkride with Basic Medical only.

I had heard the LODA only taking 1-2 days for approval - information from Beechtalk. I will be applying for it here relatively soon and will report back on how long it takes.


Josh
Dog is my Copilot offline
User avatar
Posts: 433
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 11:38 am
Location: Portland
Aircraft: 1958 Cessna 180A

Re: Confidence vs. personal limitations.

I applied for a LODA while at OSH. Received a message the next day requesting my address, which was not listed on the application I filed. I emailed that, and received the LODA the next day.

Some poor schmuck working for the FAA in Florida is now working day and night to “fulfill” these things.

What a waste of resources.

MTV
mtv offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 10514
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Bozeman

Re: Confidence vs. personal limitations.

Dog is my Copilot wrote:
contactflying wrote:John Boyd, "Do you want to be (group 2) or do (group 1)?" NineThreeKilo or JP256, you need to start a thread on LODA. I am not that familiar with that, mx, and the P40 instruction "letter" I guess. I have been talking generalities and you guys are talking about a specific incident, I think.


This may be thread drift but since it is being brought up: The LODA (Letter of deviation authority) was created as a short term workaround after the court made the ruling for limited, experimental, and primary aircraft. The LODA only applies to experimental aircraft. It has been in effect since July 12, 2021. It is a short term workaround to the mess created by this judge and ruling. I have heard the FAA needing 1-2 days to approve them and at this point is just a formality. You can either have the airplane or CFI obtain the LODA. I am going to need the LODA because I plan on flying a Glastar Sportsman with my friend who is new to tailwheels. I have zero time in the Glastar Sportsman and my friend is an airline pilot who just wants some help learning how to wheel land. There apparently is no specific prior training needed for the LODA - just the form and application.

https://www.faa.gov/licenses_certificat ... mplate.pdf.

This particular court also brought up the idea that flight instruction may require a class II medical because the instructor would be receiving compensation for flying. The court deemed "flight time" as a form of compensation for those instructors not charging for their time. Hopefully the FAA will make a separate ruling on this issue with new specific language regarding this court ruling. Older retired pilots make great instructors and many can only qualify under basic medical. So the court ruling could have an impact on future training. AOPA and EAA have both gotten involved. For now you can still teach with Basic Medical and charge for instruction. Lastly, I have always assumed that the highest timed and most experienced pilot in the airplane is ultimately responsible for the safety of the flight and will be deemed PIC if there is an incident/accident.



Josh


Well....it's not quite ALL on the court. Here's more information on what happened:

"The bureaucratic snafu sprang from the narrowly-defined Warbird Adventures case in Florida. In announcing his decision, the federal judge upheld the FAA's cease-and-desist order but offered an obiter dictum (non-binding guidance) declaring that “when the student is paying for the instruction, the student is being carried ‘for compensation.'" The FAA promptly adopted that as policy, even though it directly contradicts years of FAA policy on CFI status."

So, the court issued a non binding dictum, which the FAA decided they'd make into regulation.....

MTV
mtv offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 10514
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Bozeman

Re: Confidence vs. personal limitations.

Thanks for the information and encouragement Josh. I am really comfortable with my warm blanket (legally a passenger) now. And no doctor looking at my MRI would give me basic medical right now. Surgery in September may fix some of the nerve damage, but my right foot with titanium rod will never apply a right toe brake. I don't think the excuse that I never use brakes in airplanes anyway will hold up. In the car I just use my leg. Because of age, I only got a three year extension on the driver's license last time.

I ride mostly with young instructors now. Because my grandfather left us considerable land, I have discretionary funds for the first time in my life. Instructors who talk rather than manipulate the controls, as is most effective, don't get enough stick time. We fly on my dime, they manipulate the controls, and l get to talk. They get the safe maneuvering flight techniques they should have received from their time as a student. FAA adding low altitude orientation to the curriculum would be more helpful, but I don't expect that in my time.
contactflying offline
Posts: 4972
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:36 pm
Location: Aurora, Missouri 2H2
Download my free "https://tinyurl.com/Safe-Maneuvering" e-book.

DISPLAY OPTIONS

Previous
28 postsPage 2 of 21, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base