[email protected] wrote:Putting OAT sensors inside air inlets worked very well.
Less danger of damage when cleaning the aircraft and no holes to the outside of the airframe.
On the ground as expected, they read higher but once you have airflow all OK.
If one wants a fairly aqurate density altitude readout on the ground one should consider not putting the sensor in the duct and find a shady place outside.
One of my sensors had already been installed under the wing, say a little behind and to the side of the aft part of the pitot tube.
Still reads higher to some extend until airborne.
Think I have more OAT sensors on the 180 than on the Airbus now.
My JPI sensor is in the wing root cover, just above the door as it swings open. It, as mentio1ned, is shielded & starting the engine doesn't seem to effect the readings. The sensor for my AV-20 is next to the pilot tube, and typically reads within a degree or two of the JPI. My Dynon D100 requires a temp sensor to make the "winds aloft" direction, etc. features function. It's in the side of the fuselage below the horizontal stabilizer, which worked out to run the harness from the remote compass, which is mounted behind the baggage compartment. On a hot day, they still read within a couple degrees of each other on the ground. When I initially installed the JPI, I installed the temp sensor in the belly, as there was already holes from an old ADF antenna or such, and I thought that'd prevent a new hole being drilled....nope, even back that far, the exhaust added like 30 degrees to the readings.