Backcountry Pilot • FAA Position on Camera Mounts on Aircraft

FAA Position on Camera Mounts on Aircraft

Discuss the legality of flying the backcountry, FARs, advocacy, and aviation relevant legislation. Registered users only.
8 postsPage 1 of 1

FAA Position on Camera Mounts on Aircraft

Interesting (but not very clear) letter "clarifying" FAAs position on external mounting of cameras on aircraft: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-MyMJD ... m8/preview

MTV
mtv offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 10514
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Bozeman

Re: FAA Position on Camera Mounts on Aircraft

What I get out of it is that the FAA is not willing to provide a blanket statement about external mounts (except that they don't like them when they're not firmly attached), but would rather punt to the installer (i.e. your A&P) for determing whether such a mount is a minor or major alteration. So, you just need to find an A&P (heck, they don't even need the "P" for this) who's not afraid to exercise one of the many, many privileges of that certificate. If it's a minor alteration, and it probably is, it's just a signature.
JdS offline
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:10 am
Location: Independence
Aircraft: Maule M-5-235C

Re: FAA Position on Camera Mounts on Aircraft

That's what I read too right up till the last paragraph. That last paragraph tells me to just use a suction cup, sticky mount, or a clamp on strut mount. If I do that then part 43 doesn't apply, I can just stick it on and I'm good to go.
whee offline
User avatar
Posts: 3386
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 1:59 pm
Location: SE Idaho

Re: FAA Position on Camera Mounts on Aircraft

whee wrote:That's what I read too right up till the last paragraph. That last paragraph tells me to just use a suction cup, sticky mount, or a clamp on strut mount. If I do that then part 43 doesn't apply, I can just stick it on and I'm good to go.


I had a different read on that part. I read it as "pragmatically, we at the FAA encourage the use of suction cup mounts because they will fall off and solve the problem as the pilot will no longer have a camera about which to question us".

:twisted:
rw2 offline
User avatar
Posts: 1799
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 1:10 pm
Location: San Miguel de Allende
FindMeSpot URL: https://share.delorme.com/LaNaranjaDanzante
Aircraft: Experimental Maule
Follow my Flying, Cooking and Camping adventures at RichWellner.com

Re: FAA Position on Camera Mounts on Aircraft

I don't read it that way at all. In fact this makes it pretty clear that most of us are not altering our planes at all - and therefore do not need A&P/IA to do anything, unless the things fall off and hurt someone or something. I'd like to see a link to this letter on the FAA web site and not a random google docs upload so we can refer to it in the future.

Let's quote the relevant part:

Another consideration, in the case of this type of equipment, is the applicability of the term
alteration. FAA Order 81 10.37E, defines an alteration as a modification of an aircraft from
one sound state to another sound state. The use of suction cups, or other temporary methods of
attachment (not including permanent mechanical attachments to the aircraft), would not be
considered a modification to the aircraft. These temporary attachments would not be subject to
the regulatory purview of 14 CFR part 43.

2
The use of these type attachments however are not supported by the FAA, and may (in the case
of an inflight detachment) lead to careless operations” as provided for in 14 CFR sections
9] , 13 and 9 | .. | .
soyAnarchisto offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 1975
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:23 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Aircraft: 1955 Cessna 180

Re: FAA Position on Camera Mounts on Aircraft

I agree with Whee and Soy... Looks like it's not a "modification" or "alteration" and therefore no approval is needed. Mount it and fly it.
robw56 offline
User avatar
Posts: 3263
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:30 pm
Location: Ward
Aircraft: 1957 C-180A

Re: FAA Position on Camera Mounts on Aircraft

I also think that they are saying that it isn't a modification and then also saying that if it comes off in flight that you could be cited with careless operation (and I would actually agree with that assessment). Put it on so that it won't come off. Make sure it won't interfere with a control surface or something critical (pilots can do stupid things) and have fun. If they were saying you couldn't do it they would say you can't do it.
littlewheelinback offline
User avatar
Posts: 331
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:03 pm
Location: Bellingham, WA

Re: FAA Position on Camera Mounts on Aircraft

soyAnarchisto wrote: I'd like to see a link to this letter on the FAA web site and not a random google docs upload so we can refer to it in the future.


It's an inter-office memo. I doubt that you'll find it on the FAA's web site, but maybe.

My advice: If you're going to put a camera on the outside of your plane, make a copy of this letter, and carry it on board any time the camera or cameras are installed.

MTV
mtv offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 10514
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Bozeman

DISPLAY OPTIONS

8 postsPage 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base