Mister701 wrote:And that's the discouraging part of it Cary. I believe what you say, I just don't like the idea that the burden of proof along with the costs associated with those many hours of research falls on the accused and violated. If there were recourse to file suit against those rare inspectors who we all agree exist then perhaps it might not seem like the deck is so unequally stacked. When I stand accused of an ordinary crime I go to court and plead my case before a jury of my peers. It's the criminal code in all it's forms that I either violated or didn't. The jury will decide my guilt or innocence based on this notion of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. When I stand before an administrative court I am dealing with the Code of Federal Regulations and their interpretation by an agency. Beyond a reasonable doubt has nothing to do with it. Or so I understand.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest