z3skybolt wrote:That is what we get....
...when airfares are a fraction of what they once were corrected for inflation. Believe me the cheap airfares come right out of the airline employees paychecks and retirement: loss of stockholder equity and Billions of dollars in loans never repaid to lenders.
bob
lowflybye wrote:z3skybolt wrote:That is what we get....
...when airfares are a fraction of what they once were corrected for inflation. Believe me the cheap airfares come right out of the airline employees paychecks and retirement: loss of stockholder equity and Billions of dollars in loans never repaid to lenders.
bob
Agree with you Bob, both my father & father-in-law are airline captains along with many of my good friends so I get an inside look at a lot of aspects with many different carriers that most don't get to see.
I personally think that increasing the fares (to a point) and services offered back towards the old ways would improve things a good bit. Affordable for everyone does not always equal better. In this case, affordable for everyone...well you read the blog.![]()
Flying is a privilege, not a right...all aspects of it.
Tadpole wrote:Just a note on the loading the plane from front to rear instead of the "efficient" sounding way of rear to front. I've seen it done rear to front...the plane tipped up on it's tail since all rear passengers were loaded first and went all to the back, and no weight in the front.....
lesuther wrote:It's a choice between $700 and 7 hours for the two of us to drive and park at DIA, wait, fly, and drive to our regular MT destination. Or I can spend $850 and 4 1/2 to 5 hours (5 1/2 IFR, with rest stop) to drive to my plane, have a good time with better food, take in some great scenery, land a couple miles from my destination.
GA was clearly more economical to fly your own plane until the late 80's. The way things are going with the airlines, I think that may happen again. It's almost there now, not even counting the bizarre contributions of the TSA to the mix.
lownslow79 wrote:Tadpole wrote:Just a note on the loading the plane from front to rear instead of the "efficient" sounding way of rear to front. I've seen it done rear to front...the plane tipped up on it's tail since all rear passengers were loaded first and went all to the back, and no weight in the front.....
Yup, seen it too! I once made a fuel stop in Ashville, NC in a C-172SP years ago. The ramp guys were talking about something they heard on the radio. Apparently a ATR-72 or something like it has sat on its tail. It had full fuel and passengers were boarding at the time of the incident. Sure enough, I looked down the ramp across from the FBO and it was sitting on the tail.
lowflybye wrote:That is why a 727 (and others) have a tail stand. FedEx / UPS and others use nose gear straps on the other aircraft models...keeps the aircraft from doing a stationary wheelie. : )
and we should all appreciate each day we have to enjoy. I keep loosing friends to the grim reaper and am again reminded we need to be thankful for and cherish life's many joys, AND our friends and families. 
Tadpole wrote:lowflybye wrote:That is why a 727 (and others) have a tail stand. FedEx / UPS and others use nose gear straps on the other aircraft models...keeps the aircraft from doing a stationary wheelie. : )
that requires more man hours to use.....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests