Ya just knew this was coming......

Minnesota mom sues air traffic controller over crash that killed husband, sons


Article by: BEN NEARY , Associated Press Updated: March 7, 2013 - 9:14 PM

CHEYENNE, Wyo. - The mother of three Minnesota boys who died with their father in a 2010 plane wreck in western Wyoming is suing a company that provides air traffic control services at the Jackson Hole Airport.

Michelle Bucklin sued Virginia-based Serco Inc. in U.S. District Court in Cheyenne this week, claiming an air traffic controller's negligence caused the crash. She brought the suit as personal representative of the estates of her three sons who died in the crash.

Pilot Luke Bucklin, 41 of Minneapolis, 14-year-old twins Nate and Nick, and 12-year-old Noah all died when their small plane went down Oct. 25, 2010, in Wyoming's rugged Wind River Range.

Michelle Bucklin was living in Minnesota at the time of the crash, but her lawsuit says she now lives in Arizona.

Luke Bucklin was Michelle Bucklin's ex-husband and had subsequently remarried. He was president and co-founder of the Bloomington, Minn.-based Web development company Sierra Bravo Corp.

Bucklin had flown to Jackson in his single-engine, 1977 Mooney propeller plane to attend a family function. He had tried to book a commercial flight home when a snowstorm hit the area but decided to fly his own plane when the commercial flight was cancelled.

A voice recording of Bucklin's doomed flight shows he was struggling to gain elevation over the extremely rugged Wind River Range in bad weather immediately before the crash.

"Descending rapidly," Bucklin says on the recording. The Associated Press obtained the recording in 2011 through a Freedom of Information Act request to the Federal Aviation Administration.

"Reporting severe mountain waves," Bucklin said about a minute later, referring to wind currents over the peaks. "Probably going to (garble)."

Mountaineers found the wreckage of Bucklin's plane and the bodies of the four victims after a weeklong search.

Rock Springs lawyer Frederick J. Harrison represents Michelle Bucklin. He declined comment on Thursday.

The lawsuit states, "the airplane that Mr. Bucklin was piloting at too low an altitude, as allowed by Serco, was sucked from the sky and violently collided with a mountain."

Attempts to reach Serco officials for comment at the company headquarters in Reston, Va., were unsuccessful.

The National Transportation Safety Board adopted its report on the cause of Bucklin's accident last October. It states that Bucklin had phoned flight services at the Jackson Hole Airport twice to get weather briefings the day of his flight. Both reports warned of "mountain obscuration," turbulence and icing.

The NTSB concluded Bucklin's decision to fly his heavily loaded plane over mountains in snowy weather probably caused the accident.

However, the NTSB also noted that an air traffic controller had given Bucklin an improper flight clearance, spelling out a path that would take him over some of Wyoming's highest mountain peaks at too low an altitude. The agency said that the improper clearance, and Bucklin's acceptance of it, contributed to the accident.

"The assigned altitude was lower than and counter to FAA published requirements for the area in which the pilot was flying," the report states, "but neither the pilot nor the controller questioned the altitude assignment."

The NTSB said that Bucklin's plane was at or near its maximum certified weight at takeoff. "Although the information was available to him, the pilot was either unaware of or discounted the fact that the clearance route that he was issued and accepted required a minimum altitude near the performance limits of the airplane, and that altitude was significantly higher than the altitude he had requested," the report stated.

The report states that Bucklin appeared intent on returning home that day. "This self-imposed time pressure, coupled with his lack of recent (instrument flight rules) experience, likely resulted in his acceptance of the non-conforming clearance," the NTSB concluded.

A separate NTSB report released last August stated that Bucklin's private flight instructor, Walter Nindl, had warned Bucklin about the hazards of flying in mountainous northwestern Wyoming.

"The (instructor) reported that he specifically cautioned the pilot that since the airplane was not turbocharged or pressurized, and was not equipped for flight into known icing, there was a consequent need for the pilot to plan and operate any flights accordingly, in order to provide sufficient safety margins and escape options," the NTSB report stated.

The report states that Bucklin told the instructor that he had flown into Jackson several times and knew the risks. "The (instructor) reported that the pilot gave him the impression that the pilot would conduct the upcoming flight in compliance with the (instructor's) suggestions," it stated.

While the search was still ongoing for Bucklin's missing plane, Ray Bishop, director of the Jackson airport, said Bucklin had taken off while it was snowing heavily. Despite the weather, Bishop said in late October 2010 that the decision to fly was up to the pilot.

"The pilot in command is the pilot in command," Bishop said. He was not available for comment Thursday on the lawsuit, a receptionist at the airport said.
__________________

Cringe. Lawsuits like this take a horrible situation, and make it more horrible for everyone.

Good illustration for why the we "loser pays" where at "loser" is defined as the side that rejected a settlement offer that would have been better for them than the outcome at trial. Odds are this lawsuit wouldn't have been filed if there was such a rule. If the suit were filed, SERCO could offer $5k and probably be done with it. Won't happen in my lifetime, though.


CAVU

Some accidents i'll be nice. But this was just stupid. I just wish he'd only taken himself out instead of his whole family. Poor kids had a stupid Dad that had "get home Itis."

Fling is a nice way to travel as long as you do not need to be anywhere.

An 80+ year old friend was told to circle and hold in Class B airspace, and then to the surprise of the controller, turned into a hill and died with his son near Koko Head Crater. Most VFR pilots have held at Koko Head many times and there never was an issue. I have and it's totally safe. There were some clouds that day but, reporting VFR.

Sadly his wife was angry and brought suit against the controller, who we know as an excellent lady when on the air. Not sure what happened but I felt pretty bad that she (victim's wife) did not accept the fact it was CFIT VFR which only the pilot can control under visual conditions. The facts could be different but this is what I was told.

ZLC Handling Controller

The controller who handled the airplane from shortly after takeoff until it was lost from communications was interviewed by NTSB air traffic specialists. The controller stated that once he was in contact with the airplane, he became engaged in other tasks in his sector, and did not notice that the airplane had gone into handoff status to the next sector. The other sector controller contacted him and advised him that she would take the airplane, but he retracted the handoff, and the airplane then turned east at KICNE. A few minutes later, radar contact with the airplane was lost. During the period that the airplane was not visible on the ERAM display, the controller referred to the backup system to update the flight track. After a few minutes, the controller noted that the airplane was again displaying radar targets in the ERAM system. He restarted the track in ERAM, and the minimum safe altitude warning alert immediately activated. He checked the overhead chart for the minimum altitude for the area and the location of nearby peaks, and then advised the pilot that the minimum instrument altitude for the area was 16,000 feet. After the pilot reported difficulty climbing to the assigned altitude, although he knew it was not an approved procedure, he asked the pilot to maintain his own terrain and obstruction clearance.

The controller stated that he believed that the pilot had filed the route, and that he was not aware that the pilot’s flight plan had been amended by JAC ATCT. He also did not realize that the cleared route passed through uncontrolled airspace. He was aware of the pilot rules for use of oxygen and correctly stated the altitude limitations.

Radar Data and Radar System Status

Radar data for the investigation was obtained from ZLC recordings from radar sites located at Ashton, Idaho (QVA), and Rock Springs, Wyoming (RKS); those two sites had the best available coverage of the flight segment between KICNE and RIW. From 0841 until 1401 on the day of the accident, the RKS radar site experienced some reliability issues, and the RKS data was therefore intentionally made unavailable for display to controllers at ZLC. However, radar data from the RKS site was still being transmitted to and recorded at ZLC. The decision to render the RKS data unavailable to the ZLC controllers resulted in the loss of ATC radar contact with the flight from 1336 to 1347, since during that period the airplane was in an area where no other radar site had coverage.

ZLC was the FAA facility responsible for monitoring and managing the operation of the RKS radar site. Operational radar data from the RKS radar site was also available to Denver Air Route Traffic Control Center (ZDV) for use by controllers there. When the initial service interruption occurred, ZLC notified ZDV of the situation. Since ZDV was already operating with reduced capability because of an unrelated outage, ZDV elected to continue to use the data from the RKS site to preclude a more extensive loss of coverage than ZDV was already experiencing.

Shortly after the RKS data was determined to be unreliable by ZLC, a technician was dispatched to access the radar antenna site. Road conditions prevented him from reaching the antenna. About 5 hours after the initial failure, when it was determined that the technician could not access the site, ZLC personnel began remote diagnostic procedures in an attempt to restore the radar system operation. The system was successfully restored to service, and full functionality was returned to ZLC and ZDV

Eltee wrote:ZLC Handling Controller

The controller who handled the airplane from shortly after takeoff until it was lost from communications was interviewed by NTSB air traffic specialists. The controller stated that once he was in contact with the airplane, he became engaged in other tasks in his sector, and did not notice that the airplane had gone into handoff status to the next sector. The other sector controller contacted him and advised him that she would take the airplane, but he retracted the handoff, and the airplane then turned east at KICNE. A few minutes later, radar contact with the airplane was lost. During the period that the airplane was not visible on the ERAM display, the controller referred to the backup system to update the flight track. After a few minutes, the controller noted that the airplane was again displaying radar targets in the ERAM system. He restarted the track in ERAM, and the minimum safe altitude warning alert immediately activated. He checked the overhead chart for the minimum altitude for the area and the location of nearby peaks, and then advised the pilot that the minimum instrument altitude for the area was 16,000 feet. After the pilot reported difficulty climbing to the assigned altitude, although he knew it was not an approved procedure, he asked the pilot to maintain his own terrain and obstruction clearance.

The controller stated that he believed that the pilot had filed the route, and that he was not aware that the pilot’s flight plan had been amended by JAC ATCT. He also did not realize that the cleared route passed through uncontrolled airspace. He was aware of the pilot rules for use of oxygen and correctly stated the altitude limitations.

Radar Data and Radar System Status

Radar data for the investigation was obtained from ZLC recordings from radar sites located at Ashton, Idaho (QVA), and Rock Springs, Wyoming (RKS); those two sites had the best available coverage of the flight segment between KICNE and RIW. From 0841 until 1401 on the day of the accident, the RKS radar site experienced some reliability issues, and the RKS data was therefore intentionally made unavailable for display to controllers at ZLC. However, radar data from the RKS site was still being transmitted to and recorded at ZLC. The decision to render the RKS data unavailable to the ZLC controllers resulted in the loss of ATC radar contact with the flight from 1336 to 1347, since during that period the airplane was in an area where no other radar site had coverage.

ZLC was the FAA facility responsible for monitoring and managing the operation of the RKS radar site. Operational radar data from the RKS radar site was also available to Denver Air Route Traffic Control Center (ZDV) for use by controllers there. When the initial service interruption occurred, ZLC notified ZDV of the situation. Since ZDV was already operating with reduced capability because of an unrelated outage, ZDV elected to continue to use the data from the RKS site to preclude a more extensive loss of coverage than ZDV was already experiencing.

Shortly after the RKS data was determined to be unreliable by ZLC, a technician was dispatched to access the radar antenna site. Road conditions prevented him from reaching the antenna. About 5 hours after the initial failure, when it was determined that the technician could not access the site, ZLC personnel began remote diagnostic procedures in an attempt to restore the radar system operation. The system was successfully restored to service, and full functionality was returned to ZLC and ZDV

Most of what you said is reasonable.. BUT... You don't change sectors /controllers on the departure out of Jackson Hole till you get to a higher altitude..And you definately DON'T change controllers on the way to KICNE...

Jackson is no radar...my point was that the pilot's delay in saying "unable" killed him.
I don't think he understood that SLC couldn't see him...slippery.

Unfortunately what most of the non flying public (and even some of the flying public) don't understand is that the pilot IS the ultimate authority regarding the safety and safe operation of the airplane. I think this point needs to be emphasized repeatedly to people learning how to fly and they should let their families know that fact.

Would be nice if the NTSB and FAA would be more aggressive backing up pilots who make decisions they believe are in the best interest of the aircraft operation. Would also be nice if there weren't any bozo pilots out there who think they're not responsible for anything.

It is a shame that the controller gave the pilot bad information and I have sympathy for the pilot. Many of us might have ended up in the same position (well, hopefully we'd wait for better weather before launching in the first place).

Eltee wrote:Jackson is no radar...my point was that the pilot's delay in saying "unable" killed him.
I don't think he understood that SLC couldn't see him...slippery.

Actually, Jackson has Radar = BI-6.... Unfortunately the airport director decided not to install a display in the cab.... That signal is wired down to SLC center.... 200 miles away... and not available for local viewing... I am 100% sure if the tower controller here had seen the guy headed for Gannett Peak he would have been on the landline to SLC center to have them warm him..... Just another layer of safety they cut corners on...

Other than getting out of town, I'm not sure why you'd fly that route in a little plane. He should have cancelled at kicne and picked his own route. With a gun to my head to fly that day, I would have filed the Geyser route to start with, clear sailing from Riverton. She should sue Darwin, not the FAA. As far as the radar, I don't get why the tower doesn't have a feed. I always thought they put it in for Cheney's visits, why not finish the job?

Nosedragger wrote:Other than getting out of town, I'm not sure why you'd fly that route in a little plane. He should have cancelled at kicne and picked his own route. With a gun to my head to fly that day, I would have filed the Geyser route to start with, clear sailing from Riverton. She should sue Darwin, not the FAA. As far as the radar, I don't get why the tower doesn't have a feed. I always thought they put it in for Cheney's visits, why not finish the job?

"She should sue Darwin, not the FAA"

Man that sums it up perfectly, good one! i thought the FAA was there to provide guide service for you IFR types, this lawsuit makes it sound like the feds actually have a device that reaches out and grabs the controls while at the same time incapacitating the pilot. I mean, he was "forced" to fly that route?! Whatever happened to turning the hell around?

Stol wrote:Actually, Jackson has Radar = BI-6.... Unfortunately the airport director decided not to install a display in the cab.... That signal is wired down to SLC center.... 200 miles away... and not available for local viewing... I am 100% sure if the tower controller here had seen the guy headed for Gannett Peak he would have been on the landline to SLC center to have them warm him..... Just another layer of safety they cut corners on...

As I remember though, his mooney had reached 16,000 feet and he was unable to maintain altitude in the winds. There were some photos going around of the plane crash at a vertical attitude with the tail in the air. I dont think he mistakenly swiped a peak if my memory serves me correctly.

SixTwoLeemer wrote:

Stol wrote:Actually, Jackson has Radar = BI-6.... Unfortunately the airport director decided not to install a display in the cab.... That signal is wired down to SLC center.... 200 miles away... and not available for local viewing... I am 100% sure if the tower controller here had seen the guy headed for Gannett Peak he would have been on the landline to SLC center to have them warm him..... Just another layer of safety they cut corners on...

As I remember though, his mooney had reached 16,000 feet and he was unable to maintain altitude in the winds. There were some photos going around of the plane crash at a vertical attitude with the tail in the air. I dont think he mistakenly swiped a peak if my memory serves me correctly.

Yup..... he didn't (swiped) the peak... A massive downdraft and ice caused the stall and then gravity took over.. To set the record straight.. The tower controller saw his flightplan and knew there was NO way he could leave the Jackson Hole valley @ 9000 feet and pretty much refused to let him launch. Apparently there was some back and forth conversation and the pilot refiled using the Teton 3 Departure. Once off of Jackson and about 2-3 miles out he was instructed to contact SLC center on 133.25 and THAT controller was with him till the end... IMO, the local tower guy did his best to keep those poor souls alive and now he is getting thrown under the bus because SERCO has the easiest and deepest pockets to pick.....

Very tragic accident! To me when the big iron cancels flights out of the same airport, it is time to reconsider if continuing your flight is a prudent thing to do.

Re: Jackson Hole /Mooney

by fern_hopper » Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:58 am

Very tragic accident! To me when the big iron cancels flights out of the same airport, it is time to reconsider if continuing your flight is a prudent thing to do.

By Joshua Scheer, reporter, county10.com

Bucklin was attempting a flight home to Minneapolis from Jackson. He had delayed his flight for a day due to weather. He had booked a commercial flight as well, but it was cancelled for non-weather reasons

It has been a couple of years so my memory of the events are kinda rusty..but....

On the day of the crash the entire family was booked on a commercial flight out of JH. That morning they checked on the Mooney that was tied down and then went to the terminal to check in. The weather got a little better and the dad and sons came back to the FBO wanting to take the Mooney home. The weather then went sour and they once again went back to the terminal. While waiting for the commercial plane to get in, the weather once again got better and the dad and sons came back to the GA ramp and apparantly were going to try and beat the mom and daughter home as they stayed in the terminal for the commercial flight. he preflighed the Mooney and on initial contact with ground to get his clearance, and that is when the tower guy basically refused to let them launch at the filed altitude of 9000 feet. During the time of him refiling, a snow squall blew through and the mother and daughter were already loaded on the commercial flight... At that stage I am assuming the (race) was on in who gets home first and the Mooney pilot started making some VERY poor decisions... The Mooney left in the snow squall with maybe 1 1/2 - 2 miles visibility.. The mom and daughter left either just before or just after the dad and boys.... They were dead before the commercial flight ever got the their cruising altitude...

Sad for sure....................... Moral of the story...... Make a plan and don't let outside influences, games. races, guilt trips, etc, take control over common sense. This is a typical "get-home-itis".. it has happened many times before and will happen many more times..

Any fool can sue anyone else. Keeps attorneys alive.

We've had so many good times as a family waiting for good weather that I think now everyone secretly hopes for a nasty weather rumor. J-hole is a pretty good place to be hostages if you don't stay long enough to meet the "advocates".