Here's a new twist on the Austin plane thing, not saying I believe it all but sure brings up lots of thought inside ones gray matter ?

link below...

http://www.infowars.com/i-dont-buy-the- ... joe-stack/

In his defense I will add that just because the person in the link is a paranoid conspiracist, doesn't mean the government isn't trying to "get" him.

dirtstrip wrote:In his defense I will add that just because the person in the link is a paranoid conspiracist, doesn't mean the government isn't trying to "get" him.

One person? Try most of them! Seemed like at least half of the people who commented on the linked story are conspiracy nuts: several stated that there were no airliners on 9/11, and that missiles or planted explosives brought down the twin towers. I'm surprised that no one brought up the grassy knoll, or Marilyn Monroe's death, or the TV-studio filming of the moon walks.

Eric

Well, if it's on the internet, it must be true.

When I see anything in print I consider it someone's opinion..not necessarily fact. When you see a TV anchor talking about something, he/she is reading a script. As Jack Webb used to say on Dragnet..just give me the facts. Some people know that I am a pilot and ask me what about this or that about some airplane acccident...such as the accident at Boulder..I tell them to wait for the investigation to come out..I don't have all of the facts, and probably never will. There are people trained in that kind of investigation and for what they may find and opinions they may have, they will draw THEIR conclusions..be it fact, opinion, or politically correct. My concern..and the reason I started the other thread.....is that whatever the outcome of Austin is, I hope it's not detremental to us a pilots and the freedoms that we enjoy. HC