Backcountry Pilot • P.ponking the C180

P.ponking the C180

Aircraft building and project-level overhaul forum -- Kitplanes, experimental amateur-built, homebuilding, or even restoration of certified aircraft.
43 postsPage 1 of 31, 2, 3

P.ponking the C180

After 36 years and 2043 hrs it is finally time. After weighing the options we, my Dad and I, have decided to Pponk.
Getting started
Image
Getting some help
Image
Uncovering hidden treasures
Image
Image
Removed
Image
Building the crate
Image
Crated ready to ship to Steve.
Image


So I have learned a ton over the past week about the options for overhauling a O-470-U and all the components. If any of you are contemplating or are in the middle of such a project feel free to share or ask questions.

We are on hold until we get the engine back with a brand new McCauley C401 3blade 86" prop. Updates will follow.
Kitfox5 offline
User avatar
Posts: 132
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:41 pm
Location: Albany, Oregon
Aircraft: Kitfox5 Lycoming O290 Powered
Vans RV6
C180K

Re: P.ponking the C180

So how much will that set you back?
Hoeschen offline
User avatar
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2015 11:24 am
Location: Fargo
Aircraft: 1956 C182, 2014 RV-9A

Re: P.ponking the C180

It would hurt to say, but it is over 40K.
Kitfox5 offline
User avatar
Posts: 132
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:41 pm
Location: Albany, Oregon
Aircraft: Kitfox5 Lycoming O290 Powered
Vans RV6
C180K

Re: P.ponking the C180

you won't regret it!!
180lamb offline
User avatar
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 10:37 pm
Location: Rexburg

Re: P.ponking the C180

Nope. Can't imagine flying without one. My mechanic father in law flew with me for the first time last week and could not believe how "smooth" the engine was.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
gptc offline
User avatar
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:52 am
Location: Grants Pass

Re: P.ponking the C180

Obviously that mod's benefits are wide ranging and well documented. Some even prefer a PPONK'd 180 to a 185. With your plane in particular (really late model)...not only is it a huge performance increase it's a big value ($) adder. Good luck and keep us posted.
fiftynineSC offline
User avatar
Posts: 390
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:41 am
Location: Frisco
Aircraft: Cessna 185F

Re: P.ponking the C180

Wise choice. You won't regret it. Steve builds a very smooth well balanced engine. While you're at it, if you don' t already have a big bore exhaust system, now's the time. I went with Acorn Exhaust from Alberta. Very nicely made. Built to last. With the Canadian dollar in the hole it's a deal. =D>
RockHopper offline
Posts: 213
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 1:11 pm
Location: North Idaho-Next best thing to AK

Re: P.ponking the C180

Does that 40k include a new/overhaul prop?
soyAnarchisto offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 1975
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:23 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Aircraft: 1955 Cessna 180

Re: P.ponking the C180

soyAnarchisto wrote:Does that 40k include a new/overhaul prop?


sounds like some dream talk there! :wink:
Bigrenna offline
KB and Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2339
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 4:02 pm
Location: New England
Aircraft: C180H / C170B
www.bushwagoneast.com
www.avthreads.com

Re: P.ponking the C180

I liked my ponked motor so much, I ponked the gear box too......makes it even faster.
180lamb offline
User avatar
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 10:37 pm
Location: Rexburg

Re: P.ponking the C180

How long are you expecting the rebuild to take?
albravo offline
Posts: 713
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 12:11 pm
Location: Squamish

Re: P.ponking the C180

bigrenna wrote:
soyAnarchisto wrote:Does that 40k include a new/overhaul prop?


sounds like some dream talk there! :wink:


I assumed it did too. Your not telling me the Ponk job itself is north of 40k is it?
Hoeschen offline
User avatar
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2015 11:24 am
Location: Fargo
Aircraft: 1956 C182, 2014 RV-9A

Re: P.ponking the C180

Yes, includes a new McCauley C401 3 blade with kevlar spinner.
Kitfox5 offline
User avatar
Posts: 132
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:41 pm
Location: Albany, Oregon
Aircraft: Kitfox5 Lycoming O290 Powered
Vans RV6
C180K

Re: P.ponking the C180

4-6 weeks to get the engine back. Trying to make a trip to Idaho in June, so its going to be tight. Steve got the engine last week and probably started Monday of this week. Shipped out the governor and the RPM gauge, sold the prop and spinner, putting in new seat rails today and taking care of some belly paint issues while we wait.
Kitfox5 offline
User avatar
Posts: 132
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:41 pm
Location: Albany, Oregon
Aircraft: Kitfox5 Lycoming O290 Powered
Vans RV6
C180K

Re: P.ponking the C180

Curious what prop you had and what you got for it.

Most everybody I know who's souped up their 180 has gone with the Ponk "-50". Part of that may be because most of them are around the PNW and Pponk is right here on Camano Island. But there's other options-- I believe Texas Skyways & Air Plains both offer engine upgrades for the C180, there may be others also. What's the advantage of the Ponk conversion over the others?
Last edited by hotrod180 on Fri Apr 15, 2016 10:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
hotrod180 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 10534
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!

Re: P.ponking the C180

There are other options to get more horse power for a C180. The other popular choice is with Texas Skyways O470UTS that gets you to 263hp by using 8.3:1 compression and increases the U RPM limit to 2600. Pponk uses the 520 cylinders with 7.5:1 compression with 2700 RPM limit 275hp. I personally like the lower compression with bigger cc. We also have a long relationship with Steve Knopp, he has been doing our annual for the past 12 years, unfortunately he is so busy that he doesn't do annuals anymore. Luck would have it that the first year I take on the annual with my good friend and AI, we find metal in the filter. I'll have to try and get a picture of the filter element to post.
As for the prop that we sold, it was a 90" C204.

Some more on the Pponk decision, The Texas Skyway upgrade was more expensive by about $10,000 and that is basically for the mod to the oil system that they do. Here is a statement from their quote "The O-470-U engine is very much overbuilt for 230 HP. That’s why we selected it to increase the RPM and horsepower rating and then increase the TBO to 2500 hours. And speaking of 2500 hour TBO, the exclusive Texas Skyways Total Drain™ oil sump along with the large non congealing oil cooler and oil filter have a lot to do with that."

We already have the oil filter and non-congealing oil cooler so $10,000 for a Total drain oil sump and the STC seemed excessive. Plus I'm a little skeptical about increasing the RPM and also increasing the TBO, doesn't add up. It is basically the same engine we had, but with a prop gov allowing it to spin faster and burn more fuel for an extra 20hp. We could have used our C204 prop but we would have had to cut it down from 90" to 82" and I don't think our blades allowed for that reduction so we would have had to find new blades for the hub. Plus our prop needed to be overhauled at a cost of $4K.

With the Pponk this is what they say "to convert a stock Continental O-470 to a O-470-50 SUPER EAGLE several internal changes need to be made to the engine. First, and most obvious is to exchange the O-470 cylinders for O-520 cylinders which increases engine displacement by 50 cubic inches. The cylinders are fitted with low compression pistons which are precision balanced to within .5 grams. The carburetor is also modified. All original external accessories are overhauled and used on the O-470-50. The end product is essentially a O-520 which is carbureted and derated to 265-275 hp. Recommended TBO for the O-470-50 is 2,000 hours. A derated, precision balanced engine offers several advantages including significantly improved performance, smoother operation, less maintenance, and longer TBO."

In our environment in the PNW we were strongly encouraged to go with the nickel cylinders to help with corrosion which are offered on the 520 cylinders that Pponk uses. You can also get them for the Texas Skyway mod, but it increases the price as well. The Propeller was the biggest sticking point in the decision process. Our Prop and spinner we gave a value of $7k, that is $3k in its current condition and $4k to overhaul. So if we didn't overhaul we save $4k and if we sell it we get $3k. Are you following my logic? The new McCauley C401 86" with spinner has come down drastically in price to compete with Hartzell. We got ours for just under $11K. So over all $4K more for the propeller and the engine came out to not much more than if we had Steve do a straight overhaul with the nickel cylinders. The cost of the upgrade pencils out to less than $6000. The RR is the same for all options, so not a factor and since I'm doing it with my IA we are saving about $4K there.

Overall the Pponk made the most since financially and mission specifically. Those that have done it have been very positive about the results and we are excited to experience them ourselves.
Kitfox5 offline
User avatar
Posts: 132
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:41 pm
Location: Albany, Oregon
Aircraft: Kitfox5 Lycoming O290 Powered
Vans RV6
C180K

Re: P.ponking the C180

Kitfox5 wrote:..... We also have a long relationship with Steve Knopp, he has been doing our annual for the past 12 years, unfortunately he is so busy that he doesn't do annuals anymore......
And speaking of 2500 hour TBO, the exclusive Texas Skyways Total Drain™ oil sump along with the large non congealing oil cooler and oil filter have a lot to do with that." ... I'm a little skeptical about increasing the RPM and also increasing the TBO, doesn't add up.....


A friend of mine was having issues with his IO-470 a few months ago, he called Ponk to pick Steve's brain and Norma told him they weren't even doing engine overhauls anymore other than their 520 conversions.

As far as that 2500 hour TBO goes, I talked to a guy a while back who was selling a 180 with a Texas Skyways 520 conversion-- he referred to it being "midtime" with 1600 and some odd hours on it. TS can talk about a 2500 hour TBO all they want, but I looked at that engine the same way I'd look at a standard 470 with 1600 hours.
hotrod180 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 10534
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!

Re: P.ponking the C180

Got the new seat rails in and done.
Image
Kitfox5 offline
User avatar
Posts: 132
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:41 pm
Location: Albany, Oregon
Aircraft: Kitfox5 Lycoming O290 Powered
Vans RV6
C180K

Re: P.ponking the C180

Looks nice. McFarlanes?
How much did they nick you for them?
hotrod180 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 10534
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!

Re: P.ponking the C180

two rails, two templates and rivets were $401.10
Kitfox5 offline
User avatar
Posts: 132
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:41 pm
Location: Albany, Oregon
Aircraft: Kitfox5 Lycoming O290 Powered
Vans RV6
C180K

DISPLAY OPTIONS

Next
43 postsPage 1 of 31, 2, 3

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base