×

Message

Please login first

Backcountry Pilot • pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

A general forum for anything related to flying the backcountry. Please check first if your new topic fits better into a more specific forum before posting.
79 postsPage 2 of 41, 2, 3, 4

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

And if your tester is accurate the fuel you bought is illegal to deliver into any car except a flex-fuel vehicle.

As I understand it, you can have a 3% variation. So 10% could be 13% and still legal. That's why if we could get 12 or 13% approved by EPA, we could legally have 15% by careful blending.
180Marty offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 11:59 am
Location: Paullina IA

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

1593Y, If you'd read this thread from Supercub, you'd see more than one person it having success.
http://www.supercub.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=18760
180Marty offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 11:59 am
Location: Paullina IA

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

180Marty wrote:
And if your tester is accurate the fuel you bought is illegal to deliver into any car except a flex-fuel vehicle.

As I understand it, you can have a 3% variation. So 10% could be 13% and still legal. That's why if we could get 12 or 13% approved by EPA, we could legally have 15% by careful blending.


Please point to EPA rule. I understood 1%, but I don't know where it is in the EPA rules. I love your fudging to get to the 15% that you want, property damage be damned.
N1593Y offline
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: Sisters, OR
Fly lead free on mogas: www.flyunleaded.com

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

180Marty wrote:1593Y, If you'd read this thread from Supercub, you'd see more than one person it having success.
http://www.supercub.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=18760


There are plenty of people having success. Lots of homebuilts are flying on E10, lots of eLSAs, lots of ultralights. Most of these people are doing it because they are trying to save money in these economic times or they just can't use 100 LL. I believe that a lot of sLSAs are doing it unknowingly because pumps aren't labeled in states like California. That does not imply that it is as safe as using an approved aviation fuel such as 100 LL or ethanol free unleaded auto gas and it doesn't imply that it is wise. I know one guy who damn near lost his RV on takeoff when he unknowingly used E10. I know a number of ultralights that have suffered engine damage because of ethanol. It is a crap shoot and it would be unnecessary if we had a choice. But it seems the ethanol industry doesn't believe in choice.
N1593Y offline
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: Sisters, OR
Fly lead free on mogas: www.flyunleaded.com

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

Is it just the Octane rating that stops the STC's for ethanol free mogas being approved on the higher compression engines such as the 520's? We have ethanol free 95 UL and 98 UL available here in NZ although not realy any cheaper than 100 ll but could maybe step in if 100 ll went away?

Jamie
JamieG offline
User avatar
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:06 am
Location: OngaOnga
Aircraft: C180J, O520

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

[Please point to EPA rule. I understood 1%, but I don't know where it is in the EPA rules./quote]
Can't find EPA rule. This is from the guy in charge of the blender pump stations in Wisconsin that deals with inspectors all the time.
There is an thermal reaction and temporary volume change that occurs when blending ethanol to gas- (yes, it is a chemical bond), this plays with inspectors minds who try to sample it but in reality the products are each metered prior to this blending and as a result the inacuracy is imagined.

Frankly the 3% allowance is not uniform to every state and is needed due to the inspectors lab equip and sampling methods. I have documented this time after time. Consider E10 to be "not more than" 10%.
180Marty offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 11:59 am
Location: Paullina IA

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

180Marty wrote:
[Please point to EPA rule. I understood 1%, but I don't know where it is in the EPA rules.

Can't find EPA rule. This is from the guy in charge of the blender pump stations in Wisconsin that deals with inspectors all the time.


Blender pumps are a whole different issue that has nothing to do with E10. The E10 limit is for non flex-fuel cars and it is 10% max, although there may be a slight fudge factor in EPA statute. (In Oregon it is 9.2%-10% in statute, no fudge factor above 10%.) Blender pumps are for flex-fuel vehicles. If they use E10 and E85 to blend in between, the E10 for non flex-fuel vehicles has to be 10%, not 13%. I can understand that when the pump blends and you are paying for E20 for your flex fuel vehicle, you expect to get E20, not E15 or E25, but +-3% is probably the best the blender valve can do and it doesn't make any difference in law to a flex-fuel vehicle. It has a fuel map for the ECU that can handle anything between E0 and E85. A non flex-fuel vehicle does not and the pollution control system is not designed for anything more than E10.
Last edited by N1593Y on Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
N1593Y offline
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: Sisters, OR
Fly lead free on mogas: www.flyunleaded.com

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

JamieG wrote:Is it just the Octane rating that stops the STC's for ethanol free mogas being approved on the higher compression engines such as the 520's? We have ethanol free 95 UL and 98 UL available here in NZ although not realy any cheaper than 100 ll but could maybe step in if 100 ll went away?

Jamie


Absolutely. If your 520 TC says 100/115 avgas, that's it. If the engine says 91/96 avgas and it is also approved for 100/115 if 91/96 is not available then you could look into a Petersen mogas STC for engines that used to use 91/96. EAA has no STCs for 91/96 engines, only 80/87.
N1593Y offline
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: Sisters, OR
Fly lead free on mogas: www.flyunleaded.com

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

This from the Wisconsin guy also.
First- The only reason our blender pumps are $25,000 each is because we chose top line type pumps, they are not subsidized by an oil company program, and have $5,000 worth of cash acceptors in them.
Second-The idea of using blender pumps was the result of a conversation between my equipment supplier and I based on my needs. It saves us big money by cutting trucking expense, extra tanks, inventory costs, keeping oil company fingers out of the ethanol pie, and leaves me flexible for the future if E98 comes to fruition for street cars or racing. Think about inventory costs alone- if I had a third tank for another gas blend filled with an average inventory of 6,000 gallons X $3.00 I would have far more tied up than the extra 10,000 in dispenser cost (for 2 dispensers) plus i would have to own another $10,000 tank which could leak.

We have yet to experience a single problem with the fuel piping, seals, meters, blend valves, or any other "wet" portion of these dispensers. The blend accuracy is always perfect at 10-90%. It is my understanding that 1-9% or 91-99% could be an issue with accuracy but we never try to blend at those %'s.

People are just too afraid to step out of their box sometimes.
180Marty offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 11:59 am
Location: Paullina IA

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

EAA, Cessna and Petersen looked at STC for ethanol blended gasoline and all came to the same conclusion, there is no economically justifiable way to do it. You can make 100 octane unleaded gasoline but not economically.

>... On a side note, I am currently running premium auto fuel from Smiths grocery store, delievered by Flying J. last batch tested 12% ethanol, Flew it up to 17,500 msl and not a hint of vaporlock or detonation... So. It can be done........

One person, doing one test, on one day doesn't prove anything, except perhaps you were lucky. And if your tester is accurate the fuel you bought is illegal to deliver into any car except a flex-fuel vehicle.Let them eat ethanol.
N1593Y

Posts: 106
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 3:29 pm
Location: Sisters, OR
Private messageWebsite


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

I have been over 17,000 msl 16 times so far,, Not just one time, on one day, Fuel has tested anywhere between 8 -13 %.... Tester is DAMN accurate so thats not an issue. Tell us more about the guy you know who almost crashed his RV running E-10..
1- He obviously didn't test,
2- explain to us the symtoms of the "supposable" engine failure. How do they and you know for sure it was E-10 that caused it ? after all the pilot DIDN'T test the auto fuel ... Not a VERY smart thing to do and worse yet, he told someone what he did, or, didn't do... Now , to set the record straight I DON'T like the idea of ethanol as a fuel additive, but there is alot of BS floating around about ethanol and facts are what's needed, not some guys with a axe to grind shooting off their mouths...

Ben.
www.haaspowerair.com
Stol offline
User avatar
Posts: 1048
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: Jackson Hole Wy

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

Stol wrote:>... On a side note, I am currently running premium auto fuel from Smiths grocery store, delievered by Flying J. last batch tested 12% ethanol, Flew it up to 17,500 msl and not a hint of vaporlock or detonation... So. It can be done........
>..
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

I have been over 17,000 msl 16 times so far,, Not just one time, on one day, Fuel has tested anywhere between 8 -13 %.... Tester is DAMN accurate so thats not an issue.


OK, but that is not what you posted originally. You made the statement about one flight. How are we supposed to know that you made multiple flights if you don't tell us the whole story? And you didn't tell us what kind of airplane with what kind of engine you are running these E10 tests in? And I will say it again, if you bought 13% ethanol from a service station that puts it in non flex-fuel vehicles, that station is in violation of federal law. If your tester is that accurate, you should report them to the EPA.

Tell us more about the guy you know who almost crashed his RV running E-10..
1- He obviously didn't test,


Affirmative. He admits it. He lives in AZ. The pumps aren't labeled. He thought they only put ethanol in in the winter. This was a summer fill up. He admits it was his stupidity.

2- explain to us the symtoms of the "supposable" engine failure. How do they and you know for sure it was E-10 that caused it ? after all the pilot DIDN'T test the auto fuel ... Not a VERY smart thing to do and worse yet, he told someone what he did, or, didn't do...

Read it for yourself: http://www.vansairforce.com/community/s ... hp?t=29994
The RV is an experimental, he busted no regs, therefor telling about it was a wise thing to do for educational purposes in the RV forum.
N1593Y offline
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: Sisters, OR
Fly lead free on mogas: www.flyunleaded.com

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

I am the builder, fabricator, engineer, owner, test pilot and otherwise dumbshit for putting such a big engine in such a small plane... But. It is an experimental and after owning several certified ships I will NEVER go the route again. [-X Well, unless someone gives me a Quest Kodiak... [-o< [-o< .


For your information my plane is explained in a few web sites. Feel free to review it.

www.haaspowerair.com and

a very detailed video that should explain all of your questions;

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 0841&hl=en

for dessert.. the sound of a healthy V-8 on takeoff;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOF6eT6FRmY..

any further questions,,, just Axe...

ben
Stol offline
User avatar
Posts: 1048
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: Jackson Hole Wy

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

180Marty wrote:This from the Wisconsin guy also.
>... keeping oil company fingers out of the ethanol pie, and leaves me flexible for the future if E98 comes to fruition for street cars or racing. ...


Interpret here for me Marty. Do you know if this station is buying E10 and E85, or E0 and E100? The statement "keeping oil company fingers out of the ethanol pie" sounds like he is getting E0 and E100 and taking the blenders credit too. This really screws up the ethanol accounting system required by the feds. Of course if he is getting E10 and E85, the oil companies have already gotten what they want.

If Wisconsin allows a dealer to buy E0 and E100 and mix it in a blender pump the state will be sued by the petroleum industry. It is already happening in North Carolina and South Carolina and it will likely happen in Georgia as I hear they are trying to pass a similar law to let the dealers do the blending and claim the blenders credit. The other problem is that the distributors have to deliver the right BOB for blending, they can't deliver finished regular gasoline because then there is no way to ensure that the finished blend meets all the standards especially for RVP. This is why ethanol free gasoline is going to disappear, the only thing the refineries are going to be making is BOB for ethanol blending, and it is different for each blend level.

We have yet to experience a single problem with the fuel piping, seals, meters, blend valves, or any other "wet" portion of these dispensers. The blend accuracy is always perfect at 10-90%. It is my understanding that 1-9% or 91-99% could be an issue with accuracy but we never try to blend at those %'s.


Do you know if these are U/L approved pumps? I understand that U/L has not given approval for any blender pumps.
N1593Y offline
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: Sisters, OR
Fly lead free on mogas: www.flyunleaded.com

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

Interpret here for me Marty

Renew stations are part of Utica Energy ethanol plant(they buy straight unleaded). They are direct marketing E10,E20,and E85 through blender pumps that are not UL approved but the state of Wisconsin gave their blessing. Blenders are also catching on in Iowa, Neb., South Dakota by stations that aren't scared of their shadow.This picture is from July 2005 just west of Oshkosh. This is the way it should be everywhere--notice the price spread. I get E85 from a Green Plains Renewable blender in Spencer Iowa that has one hose dedicated to E10 and another hose that will dispense 20,30,50,and 85%. They're direct marketing also. GPRE is their stock symbol.
http://www.tcaexpress.com/~tjma/img_2576.jpg
180Marty offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 11:59 am
Location: Paullina IA

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

1593Y, Just thought of a couple of more things. All ethanol plants have to denature their product. Something called natural gasoline is added at 2 to 5%. Not sure if this would fly by itself as I think it is more volatile. Also, did you see where the convenience store operators in Tennessee were trying to get the state to force Valero to provide straight unleaded at their Memphis refinery so they(convenience store operators) could get the blenders credit themselves.. Valero said it would cost mucho bucks to do this and they would have to shut the place down causing about 400 people to lose their job.
http://memphis.bizjournals.com/memphis/ ... y1.html?s=
180Marty offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 11:59 am
Location: Paullina IA

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

N1593Y. I am assuming you are Dean Billing too. I read the posting on the Vans site and I guess my first question is,, how much do you really know about an internal combustion engine ? #-o #-o I would like a honest answer please.


Ben.
Stol offline
User avatar
Posts: 1048
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: Jackson Hole Wy

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

I'm in a negative mood now. We as pilots do not have the numbers to change any of this. I email and call politicians. It does not work, IMO.

I just got done reading the AOPA Pilot July issue. The headline is Flying in a Fragile World. It is all about Aviation and the Environment. Like it or not we are at the mercy of the green Nazi's.

Everything now comes back to global warming. Global warming is all about money and controlling us.

UL mogas will go away IMO. You will get a blend with ethanol.
UL avgas gas is coming, period. Probably 97UL and it will cost the same as avgas if we are lucky.
If we are lucky we won't get forced to add FADEC to our planes.

Carbon off sets are coming, period. In Europe there are in the planning phase. Things like carbon pricing based on fuel burn. Each ton of carbon you burn, you pay 25 euros about $35.00 AOPA states we will probably follow Europe's lead on the carbon off sets.

http://www.carbonneutralplane.com

We now have Climate Care, operated by J.P. Morgan's Environmental Marketing Group. Carbon credit trading scam.

IMO this is what the majority of the American socialist want.

Do I have a fix, yes. Will it happen, no. :(

http://www.aopa.org/pilot/

Rob
OregonMaule offline
User avatar
Posts: 6977
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 9:44 pm
Location: Orygun
My SPOT page

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety". Ben Franklin
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

180Marty wrote:>... Also, did you see where the convenience store operators in Tennessee were trying to get the state to force Valero to provide straight unleaded at their Memphis refinery so they(convenience store operators) could get the blenders credit themselves.. Valero said it would cost mucho bucks to do this and they would have to shut the place down causing about 400 people to lose their job.
http://memphis.bizjournals.com/memphis/ ... y1.html?s=


Yes. It appears all of the southern states are looking at this. North Carolina and South Carolina have statutes on their books allowing this and are being sued by the American Petroleum Institute. I know that at least Georgia and Tennessee are looking at legislation similar to North Carolina. That is why I asked you how it worked with the blender pump you knew about. It is a very complicated issue having to do with how the major oil companies account for ethanol usage that they are required to do under EISA 2007, plus a couple of other more subtle factors.
N1593Y offline
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: Sisters, OR
Fly lead free on mogas: www.flyunleaded.com

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

Stol wrote:N1593Y. I am assuming you are Dean Billing too. I read the posting on the Vans site and I guess my first question is,, how much do you really know about an internal combustion engine ? #-o #-o I would like a honest answer please.
Ben.


What a totally nonsensical question. How could you judge if my answer was honest? You clearly have an agenda with this kind of question, so throw it out there if there is something you want to know.
N1593Y offline
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: Sisters, OR
Fly lead free on mogas: www.flyunleaded.com

Re: pictures and facts from testing E0,E10, and E20 ethanol

1593Y, I have a gasoline/diesel pipeline running through one of my fields. Yesterday I was talking to the guy that comes out to mark the line if you're going to dig anywhere near it. I was quizzing him about different things and he said that what gets pumped up to Sioux City that is sold as 87 and 91 octane straight unleaded is the same except different additives to make 91. Not sure if he's right but that's what he said. You guys out west that don't want to run ethanol should get a rail car loaded with straight 87 unleaded. Maybe you could load it at an ethanol plant(about 4 semi truck loads)and it could be part of a unit train of ethanol headed out your way.
180Marty offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 11:59 am
Location: Paullina IA

DISPLAY OPTIONS

PreviousNext
79 postsPage 2 of 41, 2, 3, 4

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base