I have Aero 3000 straight skis on my 170B, with UHMW bases. Admittedly a different setup, but FWIW, I'd do it again in a heartbeat. If there's a drawback at all, I suppose it might be extra expense and weight. On the plus side, my bases are generously oversized, so they enhance the flotation of the 3000s. I believe you would have the option to oversize the plastic on the 2500 wheel skis, except for where the tire travel comes into play. The bolt holes haven't caused any damage in hundreds of hours/ landings. In fact, the bolt ends and lock nuts actually provide a bit of traction when standing on a ski, which can be an added benefit in spring when they otherwise can be really slippery on a slushy day. Because I'm on straight skis, the plastic also takes the wear and tear when I inevitably encounter some gravel or tarmac in the shoulder seasons, as well as any hangar rash from storage in the off-season. They're also easier to break the frost loose compared to metal. You can have metal or plastic skegs installed on the bottoms of the UHMW bases (recommended) (I have a combination of metal and plastic skegs on mine. I think the plastic would also acclimate to ambient temperature faster, for instance if you come out of a heated hangar onto powder snow, or if you taxi in fast and stop on snow while the bases are still warm from friction- seems to me that bare metal would have a greater propensity to melt and re-freeze the snow than plastic.
Pretty sure mine were done by Atlee Dodge- my mechanic handled that for me at the time. Anyway you can count on top-quality work from them.
Finally, if you don't already have a tail ski, do yourself a favor and get a Burl's Magnum.
Best of luck. Looking forward to a little ski flying soon myself.
Happy New Year, and congrats on the cabin.
-DP