
1SeventyZ wrote:I know you have a product to sell, and you do it a little with every post, but it's starting stink a little when you start discouraging inertial reel systems to do so. Flaps aren't the only reason to lean forward.
EZFlap wrote:My point is that an inertia reel does not solve the flap control location issue. Cessna did not put the flap control at the correct location and neither does BAS.
....
Now I come along, with an equally valid invention that solves a separate issue. The airplanes were built with the flap handle in the wrong location and it forced everyone to go bobbing for apples to reach the flap handle... with or without ANY and EVERY type of shoulder harness or none at all. Just like the BAS unit, the GPS, the memory foam seat cushion, and the "Flight Boss" organizer... people have been flying without a flap handle extension for years.
But when I offer the product for sale, nobody wants to give me the same fair shake. Nobody slammed the BAS people half to friggin' death saying "I've been flying this airplane for 75 years without your gadget installed!!!" Nobody slammed the the GPS manufacturers to the point of insantiy, even though we'd all been flying on charts and E6B's for years.
....
But still, many of the people here on these internet forums treat me like I'm selling "as seen on TV" junk that doesn't do what it's advertised to do. The same people who wring their hands over the death of general aviation and the general decline of innovations in aviation won't support the guy who comes up with something new and useful. That's what stinks.

EZFlap wrote:Sorry you guys feel so slighted, Please accept my apology for that. Zane, thanks for the kind words at a time when it would have been easier to throw stones.
Fly safe folks.
Bill
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest