So - Court rules Hobby Drones don't need to be Registered ?
Discuss the legality of flying the backcountry, FARs, advocacy, and aviation relevant legislation. Registered users only.
So, it seems a court has ruled that the FAA exceeded its authority in requiring hobbyists ( non-commercial ) to register their drones.

The federal government cannot require amateur drone pilots to register with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), a federal judge ruled Friday, MarketWatch.com reported.
The ruling in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit applies only to hobbyists, not those using drones for a commercial purpose, Market Watch noted, adding that the court grounded its reasoning in a 2012 law saying the federal government “may not promulgate any rule or regulation regarding a model aircraft.”
For more details:
Link:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... ith-faa-c/
-
Denali offline

-
Posts:
809
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 1:30 am
- Location: East Coast USA
-
Fri May 19, 2017 11:05 pm
Creates pressure for a legislative fix. However, there's a big gorilla in this fight: WalMart and all the other big box stores who've profited from the lax regs and Congresses' failure to recognize the congested and increasingly hazardous airspace issues they created by caving to what is described as the RC Model Aircraft lobby. I wonder whether any useful change can occur without a bloody celeb involved midair here in the States.
-
PapernScissors offline
-
Posts:
419
- Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 8:49 pm
- Location: Spokane
- Aircraft: Cessna 172
-
Here is a bit more on this as reported by Avweb.com
A Washington court has quashed the FAA’s drone registration program. The court ruled Friday that the registration rule violates the FAA Modernization and Reform Act, passed by Congress in 2012, that specifically bars the FAA from creating “any rule or regulation regarding a model aircraft.” Since December of 2015, the FAA has required drone owners to register drones weighing between .55 pounds and 55 pounds by filling out an online form and paying $5.
The FAA is considering its next move. It could appeal the ruling but that could be a lengthy and expensive process since it was a panel of three judges that quashed the rule. A more direct route would be to have Congress include a registration requirement in the FAA reauthorization bill that must be passed by September. The registration program was enacted to provide some measure of control and legal leverage over an explosion of consumer drones on the market. So far 820,000 drones have been registered. The ruling came from a challenge by model aircraft buff and insurance lawyer John A. Taylor. The judges agreed that the program “directly violates [a] clear statutory prohibition."
Link:
https://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/Court-Quashes-Drone-Registration-229025-1.htmlI hope when they revisit these rules that they maybe can up the 0.55 pound lower limit. I have some old old RC gliders that are about 4 pounds, and I've not flown them just because I did not want to mess with all this. Likewise, I have not done model rocketry in ages. Some of those probably weighed > 0.55 pounds too. Gosh...those were the good old says... If you can remember 80/87 red avgas you know what I am talking about.

-
Denali offline

-
Posts:
809
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 1:30 am
- Location: East Coast USA
-
My guess is the FAA abandons this. After all the court system just gave them all the cover they need.

-
Barnstormer offline
-
Posts:
2700
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:42 am
- Location: Alaska
- Aircraft: C185
-
Registering my conventional r/c planes at $5 each with the FAA is fully retarded, and the reason I haven't bothered with models in quite a while.
The model plane industry outside of POV drones self regulated very successfully for the previous century.
-
aftCG offline

-
Posts:
360
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 9:55 pm
- Location: Tacoma
- Aircraft: Kitfox series 5
-
DISPLAY OPTIONS
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests