Backcountry Pilot • SPOT vs PLB

SPOT vs PLB

A general forum for anything related to flying the backcountry. Please check first if your new topic fits better into a more specific forum before posting.
48 postsPage 1 of 31, 2, 3

SPOT vs PLB

ImageImage
The following is a description of the new SPOT satellite messenger and a comparison of it to personal locater beacons (PLBs). I bought a PLB when the first ones with a built in GPS became available in 2004 and have learned a lot about them since then in part from regular meetings with the manufacturer. I managed to get a SPOT satellite messenger even before they were offered for sale and have been testing it for about 6 months now. I have sent hundreds of SPOT messages and have been impressed with its usefulness and reliability. I now carry a SPOT whenever I fly and have bought them for several friends and family members. I hope that after reading this you will be better able to make a decision about whether a PLB or SPOT satellite messenger would work best for you.

When you activate a PLB it sends out a distress signal via satellite with the PLB's identification number. This number is used to look up who you are and the contact information that you entered when you registered the beacon. The PLB sends out distress signals every 5 minutes until the battery runs out or until you turn it off. Once the PLB has determined where it is by using its built in GPS (if it has one) then it sends the location with your distress signal. A PLB is an all or nothing device. Most people will never use theirs. SPOT can do much more and, unlike a PLB, most people will use theirs frequently.

The SPOT satellite messenger can function like a PLB when the user presses the 911 button. It uses a different satellite constellation and the message goes to a different dispatch center but the end result is the same. SAR knows who you are and where you are within minutes. SPOT's help messages are resent every 5 minutes to help guarantee that your distress call gets out even when in an area with less than ideal satellite coverage. SPOT uses the Globalstar satellites. You probably have heard about the problems Globalstar has had with their satellite phones in recent months. Fortunately, the problem does not affect SPOT. The failing component on the satellites that has caused a severe problem for two way communication does not affect the one way communication that SPOT uses.

SPOT can do several things that a PLB cannot. For example, SPOT can let your friends or family know where you are and that you need help with out alerting the authorities. Say you are at a back country airstrip with a mechanical problem or an incident and no one is hurt. You don't have a responsibility to notify the FAA and NTSB. All you really need is a ride home or a new part so instead of pressing the 911 button you press the request help button. Your friends get a text message on their cell phone with your GPS location or an emailed message with a link like this http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=40.8648,-111.9282&ie=UTF8&z=12&om=1 which brings up Google maps showing exactly where you are. They can switch to satellite view on the upper right and zoom in using the slider on the upper left for more detail.

You can also use your SPOT to let friends or family members know where you are and that you are safe by pressing the "OK" button. It sends text messages and/or emails just like the help message. This can be used to let a spouse or other concerned person know you arrived safely at a back country airstrip and at each stop you make or can be used to "rub it in" when you are out playing and your friends are stuck at work.

It is easy to change the message sent out when the different buttons are pressed and who the message goes to from any internet connection. By choosing a different message profile you can change the contacts and message text with only a few mouse clicks. I make use of this to change the contacts depending on the type of trip I am going on. For example, I want different people notified if I need help when flying to the back country than I do when going skiing or hiking.

Another feature not available on PLBs that is optional on SPOT satellite messengers is tracking. For $50 extra per year you can have tracking. With tracking you can put the SPOT in tracking mode and set it on the glare shield and it will automatically send out a position report every 10 minutes until you turn off the tracking mode. You can let someone back home access this tracking feature so they can see your progress as you fly across the country or you can use it once you get back home to see if you were where you thought you were. If you use the tracking feature like this even if you are incapacitated and unable to press a button, SAR would have a good idea of where to look for you if you were reported missing. Image


In addition to being able to request help from friends, check in with family and do tracking other advantages of the SPOT are that it weighs 3 ounces less than the smallest PLB and is a little smaller. It also has user replaceable batteries. A single set of AA lithium batteries will send out about 2000 messages. AA alkaline batteries can also be used in an emergency but do not have the same shelf life and can not send as many messages before being depleted.

I think that cost of PLB and the SPOT satellite messenger are very comparable. Even though SPOT has a lower initial purchase price at $150 vs $650 it makes up for it with a $99 yearly subscription fee. At the 5th year mark both will have cost the same. You have to keep paying the SPOT satellite subscription fee but it is also recommended that you replace the batteries in the PLB after 5 years which probably costs close to $200.

The biggest advantage of the PLB over SPOT is coverage area. PLBs have worldwide coverage. They even work in the middle of the ocean and at the poles. SPOT has limited coverage. As you can see from the coverage map SPOT will not work in most of the ocean, in southern Africa or north western Alaska. The BLM in Anchorage has tested SPOT and found that it works well. In fact, they ordered quite a few units. I have not tested it in Alaska yet but would not count on it to save my life even while in parts of Alaska that are supposed to have good coverage. The problem is that the coverage map assumes you have a full unobstructed view of the sky. The SPOT satellites never get further north than 52 degrees latitude as they go around the earth. So if you are much farther north than about Calgary Canada you will need a view of the southern sky to use your SPOT satellite messenger. When North of 52 degrees latitude just sitting on the north side of a big boulder would be enough to keep the SPOT from working. The farther north you go the lower in the southern sky you need to be able to see. In Anchorage the satellites never get above about 45 degrees from the horizon. This would not be a problem for someone on a boat with pretty wide open views of the sky but certainly could be on land.
Image

Although I do not think a SPOT is the best choice for someone living in Alaska the very first life SPOT saved was in Alaska. Mike Brady collapsed in minus 30 degree temperatures while working in a remote outpost in the Wrangell St. Elias National Park. He summoned help by pressing the 911 button on his SPOT and a National Guard helicopter came and picked him up. You can see a video about it here.

My advice to people is that if they are only concerned about travel in the lower 48 that SPOT works great and will give more utility than a PLB. If traveling to Northern Canada, Alaska or anywhere else with limited SPOT coverage you may still want to use SPOT for checking in, tracking , requesting help from friends etc, but I would not travel there without a PLB too. In the recent case where a BCP member had a disabled aircraft in Utah but was not significantly injured he could have used a SPOT to get help from his friends before his wife and the BCP community even had a chance to worry about him. He also would have likely been able to avoid the media attention and been able to retrieve his airplane without notifying the FAA.

I hope you find this a valuable comparison. I would be glad to answer any questions you might have. I also want to let you know that I have recently set up a coupon code for all BCP members to use at www.PreparedPilot.com. During the checkout process if you enter "BCP" where it asks for a coupon code you will get a 10% discount off anything you order. That means a up $65 discount on some items.

Here is a link to a Survivor Man Video about SPOT that has a lot of information.

Sincerely
Rob Hunter
Prepared Pilot, LLC
(8Ol)455-527l
Last edited by Prepared Pilot on Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Prepared Pilot offline
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:13 am
Location: Utah

Good writeup Rob, thanks. Maybe try to wedge a photo of the Microfix in there somewhere?
Zzz offline
Janitorial Staff
User avatar
Posts: 2855
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: northern
Aircraft: Swiveling desk chair
Half a century spent proving “it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

Can the spot batteries be recharged like a BT GPS. External charger with power cord?
OregonMaule offline
User avatar
Posts: 6977
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 9:44 pm
Location: Orygun
My SPOT page

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety". Ben Franklin
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin

RobBurson wrote:Can the spot batteries be recharged like a BT GPS. External charger with power cord?

The recommended AA lithium batteries can not be recharged. You might be able to use rechargeable NiMH batteries but personally I would not bother. A pair of AA lithium batteries come with the SPOT and will send about 2000 messages before needing replacement. You can leave the SPOT turned on for a year ready to send a message before you will need to change the batteries. Replacement AA lithium batteries are available at almost every corner drugstore for around $7. I have not had to replace mine yet.
Prepared Pilot offline
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:13 am
Location: Utah

Great write up! We are testing SPOT here in the park for government use. We already have multiple GPS-enabled PLB's. We've found that in the Alaska Range the Globalstar coverage is not perfect, though better than "spotty."

One thing I've been curious about (and will look on the site) is if the SPOT broadcasts audio on 121.5 like the PLB's? I'm guessing not...though the utility of that is probably not that important if rescuers already have a waypoint.
onceAndFutr_alaskaflyer offline
Posts: 1319
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 4:23 pm
Location: Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan and Carson Valley, Nevada

Fantastic review. I went straight to the website and bought one. 15 bucks off. Woo hoo!!
Renegade offline
User avatar
Posts: 241
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 2:24 pm
Location: Dallas, TX King Salmon, AK
Big fish, Beavers, and Bears!
http://www.alaskarainbowlodge.com

once&futr_alaskaflyer wrote:One thing I've been curious about (and will look on the site) is if the SPOT broadcasts audio on 121.5 like the PLB's? I'm guessing not...though the utility of that is probably not that important if rescuers already have a waypoint.

SPOT does not have a 121.5 homing frequency like the 406 MHz PLBs do. I agree that it would be of limited use since rescuers already know where you are.

Your coverage with SPOT in the Denali area should be pretty good IF you have a view of the entire sky. If a mountain or other obstacle were to obstruct your view of the southern sky I would not expect you to get any coverage. SPOT may prove to be useful for you as it did for Mike Brady but you will not be able to count on it in all locations. If you are considering using it in aircraft I would suggest getting the optional tracking service so that way points would be sent every 10 minutes while you are in the air with good satellite coverage which would narrow down the search area even if you ended up in a canyon with no signal.
Prepared Pilot offline
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:13 am
Location: Utah

I think I mentioned this on another topic, but I bought the SPOT PLB this last winter and tested the track feature while flying through the Owyhee River and canyons. When I got home that night and went onto the SPOT web site, I found that the SPOT did not track my course. My guess is that the unit needs a clear view of the sky (which was stated by SPOT)(I had the unit hanging on my grab handle next the left window). But when we landed at some of the strips, I pushed the OK button (with the unit outside of the plane) and my family and friends recieved a message that I was OK. So far I think the SPOT works really great!! Next time I go flying, I'll try to put the unit on the dash if I want to use the track feature. Other wise I should carry it on me in case of an emergency :shock: .
58Skylane offline
User avatar
Posts: 5297
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: Cody Wyoming

58Skylane wrote:...I found that the SPOT did not track my course. My guess is that the unit needs a clear view of the sky...

For optimum performance the antenna, which is directly under the logo , should be positioned so that the SPOT logo faces the sky. If it is turned sideways it will not work as well.

Once it is in tracking mode if you press the tracking/OK button again it turns off the tracking mode. It tries to tell you this by blinking red LEDS instead of the normal green ones.
Prepared Pilot offline
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:13 am
Location: Utah

Canyons

Howdy Rob, Thanks for the great write up. I was wondering how well the Spot would work in a deep canyon, or one with dense trees? I have hiked down a few deep canyons in Idaho and my handheld quit navigating from lack of coverage.



WW
wagonwrench offline
User avatar
Posts: 107
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 12:40 pm
Location: Grangeville, ID

Re: Canyons

wagonwrench wrote:... I was wondering how well the Spot would work in a deep canyon, or one with dense trees?...


Idaho's canyons should not be a problem. If you look at a map of where globalstar satellite phone calls originate there is a large concentration coming from the bottom of the grand canyon and cataract canyon. Satellite phones are rented by people taking multi week river trips and they are successfully able to get a signal out. When I have done tests in canyons I have found that although some signals get blocked that many get through.

When you press the help or 911 buttons, SPOT sends the message every 5 minutes until either you cancel the message or the batteries run out after about a week. Even if some of those help requests do not get out the next one likely will.

I have not tested it in dense trees yet but would guess that at some point the trees would be so dense that no satellite based communication would work. If it were me and I needed help or wanted to send an OK message I would try to find a small clearing. If you arrived by airplane there will likely be a big enough clearing. Hopefully, the clearing will not be one you just made with the wings of your airplane.
Prepared Pilot offline
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:13 am
Location: Utah

I have SPOT and have been using it two months.

Iridium will give you much better localization at
a much higher price; check out baja bush pilots
for comparisons.

I have SPOT placed on my dashboard and flown for
2 1/2 hours doing instrument proficiency (i.e.
high) in the Salinas area and got maybe 10
locations.

If I were crashed in a East/West canyon, I'd be
crawling to the rim rather than rely on the
SPOT; but I do recommend it; inexpensive,
good geek factor, and the "I've landed and I'm
OK message".
rjb offline
User avatar
Posts: 173
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:38 pm
Location: E16

I purchased one and have liked its messaging functions. When it does work, it places your location on Google map exactly where you were. Pretty cool. However, it's not worked on a whole trip once and worked intermittently on my last trip. Not sure why.

The times it didn't work, I had a very clear view of the sky (especially to the south). I've always made sure the view of the sky is clear before I power it up. I place it "face up" then press the power button - looking for the light to flash. Then after it's been on for a bit, I press the "OK" button, then let it sit for a bit (like 10 min). After that I shut it off. I guess Rob is saying it will last a year if left on continuously? Where does it say it will last that long?

It's definitely cool to say to others where you're at, or where you've been. I'm just not sure it's going to help me when I need it most. Even a PLB could fail though, I guess. What did Steve Fossett have?

On my next trip, I'll power it up and leave it on the whole trip. Maybe that will work better. Probably operator error. Just sharing my experience so you can learn what not to do.

Pathpaver
lazflyn offline
User avatar
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:42 pm
Location: Utah
Flying is magic... till you hit the trees.

lazflyn wrote:I What did Steve Fossett have?

In my opinion? An exit strategy, a new identity, and a mansion on some tax haven island 8)

Hey RJB I wasn't aware that Iridium had a similar device - or are you talking about the more expensive automated flight following service?
onceAndFutr_alaskaflyer offline
Posts: 1319
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 4:23 pm
Location: Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan and Carson Valley, Nevada

once&futr_alaskaflyer wrote:
lazflyn wrote:I What did Steve Fossett have?

In my opinion? An exit strategy, a new identity, and a mansion on some tax haven island 8)

Hey RJB I wasn't aware that Iridium had a similar device - or are you talking about the more expensive automated flight following service?


Maybe this unit http://www.iridium.com/products/product.php?linx=0267

The key I think is external antennae and custom reporting intervals down to every 4 seconds. :shock: The baja pilot comparison was two minute intervals as opposed to spots ten minute intervals.
retired user offline
Posts: 710
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 7:07 am

N6EA wrote:
once&futr_alaskaflyer wrote:
lazflyn wrote:I What did Steve Fossett have?

In my opinion? An exit strategy, a new identity, and a mansion on some tax haven island 8)

Hey RJB I wasn't aware that Iridium had a similar device - or are you talking about the more expensive automated flight following service?


Maybe this unit http://www.iridium.com/products/product.php?linx=0267

The key I think is external antennae and custom reporting intervals down to every 4 seconds. :shock: The baja pilot comparison was two minute intervals as opposed to spots ten minute intervals.
That is the unit we use in our Department of Interior aircraft, through this interface:

https://www.aff.gov/default.asp
onceAndFutr_alaskaflyer offline
Posts: 1319
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 4:23 pm
Location: Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan and Carson Valley, Nevada

once&futr_alaskaflyer wrote:
N6EA wrote:
once&futr_alaskaflyer wrote:
lazflyn wrote:I What did Steve Fossett have?

In my opinion? An exit strategy, a new identity, and a mansion on some tax haven island 8)

Hey RJB I wasn't aware that Iridium had a similar device - or are you talking about the more expensive automated flight following service?


Maybe this unit http://www.iridium.com/products/product.php?linx=0267

The key I think is external antennae and custom reporting intervals down to every 4 seconds. :shock: The baja pilot comparison was two minute intervals as opposed to spots ten minute intervals.
That is the unit we use in our Department of Interior aircraft, through this interface:

https://www.aff.gov/default.asp


The comparison is in the April newsletter and is a pdf so no copy paste. The author say about 2,000 is the cost but doesn't give a part number. The picture he shows looks similar but I can't really see the whole unit. Does that price sound about right ?
retired user offline
Posts: 710
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 7:07 am

N6EA wrote:
once&futr_alaskaflyer wrote:
N6EA wrote:
once&futr_alaskaflyer wrote:
lazflyn wrote:I What did Steve Fossett have?

In my opinion? An exit strategy, a new identity, and a mansion on some tax haven island 8)

Hey RJB I wasn't aware that Iridium had a similar device - or are you talking about the more expensive automated flight following service?


Maybe this unit http://www.iridium.com/products/product.php?linx=0267

The key I think is external antennae and custom reporting intervals down to every 4 seconds. :shock: The baja pilot comparison was two minute intervals as opposed to spots ten minute intervals.
That is the unit we use in our Department of Interior aircraft, through this interface:

https://www.aff.gov/default.asp


The comparison is in the April newsletter and is a pdf so no copy paste. The author say about 2,000 is the cost but doesn't give a part number. The picture he shows looks similar but I can't really see the whole unit. Does that price sound about right ?


Sounds about right plus labor to install in A/C and subscription to third-party service (similar to the SPOT) to provide web-based interface and/or monitoring.
onceAndFutr_alaskaflyer offline
Posts: 1319
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 4:23 pm
Location: Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan and Carson Valley, Nevada

The iridium doesn't charge a yearly subscription like the SPOT
but a transaction charge per transmission (0.15?) every 2
minutes.
rjb offline
User avatar
Posts: 173
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:38 pm
Location: E16

Funny that Rob posted this today, because I just noticed another SPOT review over on the telemark skiing website that I read:

http://telemarktalk.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=39166
Zzz offline
Janitorial Staff
User avatar
Posts: 2855
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: northern
Aircraft: Swiveling desk chair
Half a century spent proving “it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

DISPLAY OPTIONS

Next
48 postsPage 1 of 31, 2, 3

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base