×

Message

Please login first

Backcountry Pilot • Stephen Bungay's THE MOST DANGEROUS ENEMY

Stephen Bungay's THE MOST DANGEROUS ENEMY

Found a good flying movie or book? Share your thoughts.
5 postsPage 1 of 1

Stephen Bungay's THE MOST DANGEROUS ENEMY

This is an absolutely fantastic book about the Battle of Britain. In particular, it demolishes many of the myths surrounding the Luftwaffe. For anybody with an interest in the Battle of Britain it'll be a great read and will certainly change your perspective.
pitfield offline
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 5:05 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: Stephen Bungay's THE MOST DANGEROUS ENEMY

I just read a "what if" article and if it happened the Battle of Britain might have never been.
Suppose Churchill had not succeeded in pressuring Chamberlain to interfere with Hitler’s negotiations with the Polish colonels by issuing a British guarantee to Poland in the event of German aggression. Would World War II have resulted or would it have been a different war?

The British guarantee emboldened the colonels and frustrated Hitler’s attempt to restore a Germany dismantled by the Versailles Treaty. The result was Hitler’s secret pact with Stalin to divide up Poland, technically known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.

Having given the guarantee, Britain was honor-bound to declare war on Germany (fortunately not also on the Soviet Union), which pulled in France because of the British-French alliance against Germany.

Without Britain’s guarantee, the German (September 1, 1939) and Soviet (September 17, 1939) invasions of Poland would have been prevented by the Polish colonels’ acquiescence to Hitler’s demands and would not have resulted in Britain and France starting World War II by declaring war on Germany, resulting in the fall of France, the British driven off the continent, and Roosevelt’s determination to involve the US in a foreign war unrelated in any significant way to Americans’ interests.

Historians write that Hitler’s ambitions were in the East, not the West. Without the British and French declaration of war, the war might have been contained, with the two totalitarian powers fighting it out.

Alternatively, Hitler and Stalin might have continued their cooperation and together seized the oil rich Middle East. The British, French, and Americans would have been a poor match for the German and Soviet militaries. General Patton, the best American commander, thought he could take on the Red Army that had crushed the Wehrmacht, but his hubris did not worry Red Army commanders, who defeated the bulk of the German Army, which was deployed on the Eastern Front, while the Americans, aided by German motorized units running out of fuel, struggled to contain a small part of German forces in the Battle of the Bulge. Today we would be buying our oil from a German/Soviet consortium.

180Marty offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 11:59 am
Location: Paullina IA

Re: Stephen Bungay's THE MOST DANGEROUS ENEMY

Bungay discusses all of this in great detail, and the article you read makes observations which are valid. War with Germany was not at all inevitable, and was in fact EXACTLY what Hitler didn't want; he was a committed anglophile and, as you noted, was intently focussed on Germany's need for eastward expansion. Churchill was rabidly anti-German expansion and was a lonely voice for quite some time. To be fair, though, Churchill did seem to be one of the few who appeared to have read Mein Kampf and took Hitler's views on Jews and gypsies and communists at face value. It's hard to imagine the butchery of the Nazis could have been worse than it was, but it's not clear that Germany would have been chased out of Russia had it not been engaged on assorted other fronts. Had they beaten the Russians, who knows what might have occurred.
pitfield offline
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 5:05 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: Stephen Bungay's THE MOST DANGEROUS ENEMY

Not so sure it was the Russian Army that defeated the Germans in the east as opposed to the Russian winter and stretched supply lines.

Good for mankind that Churchill thought as he did and got involved...followed by FDR. This was truly a case of good vs evil.
Bushcaddy offline
User avatar
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 8:34 am
Location: Marshfield, MA, USA

Re: Stephen Bungay's THE MOST DANGEROUS ENEMY

pitfield wrote:War with Germany was not at all inevitable, and was in fact EXACTLY what Hitler didn't want; he was a committed anglophile and, as you noted, was intently focussed on Germany's need for eastward expansion.


Yet he declared war on the U.S. after Pearl Harbor, and attacked the Soviets after the war with the West was already in full swing. Playing "what-if" is fun, but it's just mental masturbation when the the questions are so large and the central figure was a total nut job. Not that I can't get into myself--would the Axis have gotten the Bomb if the Allies didn't have Ultra or if the Battle of Britain had been lost? But I don't have the interest or attention span to finish a whole book of alternate history. There's too much real history that I've yet to learn. :)

CAVU

Edit: Sorry. Didn't mean to suggest that Bungay's book is alternate history.
CAVU offline
User avatar
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 4:54 pm

DISPLAY OPTIONS

5 postsPage 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base