low rider wrote:FAA could probably bust every one of us for something or another. Doesn’t really matter what us pilots think of someone laying down buzz jobs or whatever. Matters what the FAA thinks . Like it or not . I’m betting the FAA is getting quite sick of you tube pilots and when there is a call to action against one of them they might just have a more difficult time letting whatever they did slide . ……

contactflying wrote:Most of us have been military or in some situation under government control. We learn to avoid situations that can become administrative. In Army aviation we call it Warrant Officer mentality. Do your job but don't try to impress anyone. Don't try to beat the system. Stealth.

And many pilots are getting quite sick of un American “administrative law”

sierrasplitter wrote:

And many pilots are getting quite sick of un American “administrative law”

I grew up in south Texas. Born in 62. I vividly remember all the bumper stickers displayed on every work truck and old car in the neighborhood.

they read

America - Love it or Leave it

low rider wrote:Your basically arguing with yourself at this point

NineThreeKilo wrote:

sierrasplitter wrote:

Ahh, no I didn’t

But doesn’t matter,

It does to me. maybe Im the last guy in America that ask for actual proof of action instead of assumptions.

You misunderstood what I said

My point is comparing the punishment

One was resulted in major danger to anyone on those public lands, destruction of a plane and the environment and change for a fire in a place that always catches on fire, etc

Palmer did a low pass and not even a ladybug was harmed

A1Skinner wrote:

NineThreeKilo wrote:

sierrasplitter wrote:

Ahh, no I didn’t

But doesn’t matter,

It does to me. maybe Im the last guy in America that ask for actual proof of action instead of assumptions.

You misunderstood what I said

My point is comparing the punishment

One was resulted in major danger to anyone on those public lands, destruction of a plane and the environment and change for a fire in a place that always catches on fire, etc

Palmer did a low pass and not even a ladybug was harmed

If you are going to compare punishments then you can’t use a bunch of hypotheticals in one case and not the other. I’m not sticking up for dude intentionally crashing his plane, but in reality all he did was that. He didn’t cause harm to anyone, or start a fire. Trent could have easily caused all the same side affects had he had a slight misjudgement or had a duck fly into his windscreen. Chance of fire was probably higher in Trent’s case because he actually had fuel in his plane.
Buzz jobs are fun and all, but do it away from the general airplane hating public and keep it off YouTube.

Zzz wrote:

low rider wrote:Your basically arguing with yourself at this point

He an argue bot. That's what he does.

pburns wrote:

Zzz wrote:

low rider wrote:Your basically arguing with yourself at this point

He an argue bot. That's what he does.

No he’s not…..