whynotfly wrote:Why can't primary trainers such as the C150 or 172 have a "pretend" gear knob or switch on the panel to simulate gear down and up procedures, with the thought that sooner or later that student might be making the transition to a retractable.
That mention reminded me... Jack Tetrick, the CFI that I spend most of my time with for Private, Commercial, and Instrument training, took me flying once in a Pazmany PL-4 that he had purchased from the Taiwanese Air Force, who used 10-12 of them as primary trainers. The PL-4 was a 2-seat side-by-side all-metal airplane roughly the size of an RV-6, but with a T-tail that made stalls rather "interesting". Apparently, spin training was definitely on the agenda for the TAF guys...
It was a pretty cool plane, with some funny "military-style" quirkiness to it, since it was built to "mil-spec" standards for the most part, down to the green canvas-covered seats... IIRC, it had an O-235 engine, and fixed pitch prop. But the strangest feature was that right there on the panel was a "landing gear switch" with "Gear Down" and "Gear Up" placards. Of course, being a fixed-gear airplane, the switch didn't actually raise or lower the gear... But when the switch was placed in the "down" position, there would be a small delay, and then the three "Gear Down" lights would illuminate. And when the switch was placed in the "up" position, the green lights turned amber for a few seconds, then went dark. Even the checklist and POH were in on the "game, calling for the gear to be "raised" after takeoff and "lowered" before landing... Apparently, all this was to ensure the TAF pilots who trained in it developed good gear habits...



