Backcountry Pilot • 172 Insulation - Selkirk?

172 Insulation - Selkirk?

Have you modified your aircraft? STC? STOL Kit? Major rebuild from just a data plate?
6 postsPage 1 of 1

172 Insulation - Selkirk?

I am doing a winter interior project on the 172 including pulling out old wiring (up over 20lbs so far!), painting panels, new seats, etc. I have been considering going with Selkirk's insulation kit for the sides and ceiling. They offer both 1/4" as well as 1/2" foam. The 1/2" weighs about 9lbs for the the total kit with the 1/4" about half of that. Has anyone used one of the Selkirk kits? I understand it still needs a spray adhesive to mount the insulation. Is the 1/2" worth the the extra weight or is 1/4" adequate. I am a little limited on time so I like the precut nature vs the roll your own approach. I'm open to other suggestions as well. I figured now is the time to tackle it while the interior is all out.
Kerbs offline
User avatar
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:54 pm
Location: Port Townsend
Aircraft: 69' 172-180hp (Airplains Conversion)
Previous: Taylorcraft BC12D-85

Re: 172 Insulation - Selkirk?

I’ve used their insulation kits a few times and have been happy with the results. On 1/4” vs 1/2”, since the only tangible benefit is noise reduction and not heat loss, my best guess is that you would get 90% of the benefit out of 1/4” and would just lose 4 pounds of useable load with the 1/2”. That’s definitely a WAG calculation though.
FWIW, I love their interior kits too, but the fiberglass does seem to be noisier than fabric.
flyingzebra offline
User avatar
Posts: 479
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 4:53 am
Location: Northwest Washington state
Aircraft: Cessna Skylane 182 N3440S, Aviat Husky N2918L

Re: 172 Insulation - Selkirk?

I have used there kits on two planes. I like the product. I have used 1/4" everywhere. and 1/2" in the extended baggage for protection as I have no sides in there. I like the 3M contact adhesive more than the super 77. especially on the ceilings. It seems to hold better.

When working under the instrument panel and on the firewall I use a sound proofing product from airtex: it is 1/4" foil faced with adhesive already on one side. It really cleans up the look under there.
Barrakudaman offline
Posts: 157
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 7:15 pm
Location: Fonddulac
Aircraft: 1960 Cessna 182

Re: 172 Insulation - Selkirk?

Thanks, appreciate the feedback. I was leaning towards the 1/4" insulation and sounds like that's the way to go.
Kerbs offline
User avatar
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:54 pm
Location: Port Townsend
Aircraft: 69' 172-180hp (Airplains Conversion)
Previous: Taylorcraft BC12D-85

Re: 172 Insulation - Selkirk?

We completely stripped out the cabin from extended baggage to panel. 1/4 is not thick enough to give much protection, it is ok if you put interior panels back in. but if not I would do the entire interior with 1/2. It fits better and does not stretch as you glue it into place. We cut our own it was not that hard glued in with 3M contact cement. DENNY
DENNY offline
Posts: 773
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2013 7:16 pm
Location: CHUGIAK
DENNY

Re: 172 Insulation - Selkirk?

I ordered the 1/4" kit from Selkirk. They were good to deal with and it was pretty much spot on what I was looking or. The pieces are roughly cut to shape but require quite a bit of fitting still. In hindsight I would probably purchase the bulk material and do it myself. It would only be marginally more work and a little better outcome. It will be under my redone panels so It should work well regardless.

Image
Kerbs offline
User avatar
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:54 pm
Location: Port Townsend
Aircraft: 69' 172-180hp (Airplains Conversion)
Previous: Taylorcraft BC12D-85

DISPLAY OPTIONS

6 postsPage 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base