3 blade pros and cons
Lycoming, Continental, Hartzell, McCauley, or any broad spectrum drive system component used on multiple type.
Hey guys I need someone smarter than me to help me with prop choices of 2 vs 3 blade.
I have a 150 with a 160hp 320 going into experimental exhibition, I need to order a prop for it.
I am limited to a 74” prop as it is still a tricycle and will remain that way.
I talked to sensenich and they have a 3 blade ground adjustable with stol profile blades that they can make into a 74”. Is there any reason not to do it? I figure since I can’t get the length I need in a 2 blade then the 3 blade is the next best thing but there’s not any real data out there to make the choice easy as to stay 2 blade or go 3 blade.
Thanks guys
-
62150B offline
-
Posts:
27
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 1:31 pm
- Location: Dover
- Aircraft: 1962 150/160
-
I used to own a C150/150 taildragger.
The prop it came with turned out to be below minimums.
I thought about trying to get an 82" borer prop (popular on supercubs) approved,
but ended up buying a new Sensenich 74DM6S5-56 prop,
which actually turned out to be pitched at closer to 58 from the factory.
Eventually I had it repitched to about 54-1/2 which worked great for me.
I'd guess with yours being a 160hp, a 74" prop pitched to 56 or maybe even 58 might be about right.
IMHO a 160 doesn't really need more diameter, or 3 blades.
-
hotrod180 offline


-
Posts:
10534
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
- Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!
Taildragger or Nose wheel?
What do you want to do? If you fly with super cub buddies a bigger prop like 2 blade sensenich 82 inch is great.
( Taildragger or air-glass fork Big wheels only)
For all around a 56 pitch 74 inch sensenich works fine so will a carbon 76 inch sensenich ground adjustable. You want to be as light on the nose as possible if you have a swept tail 150 taildragger.
We used to have one and it was a awesome little plane pitched to a 72 on a 74 inch sensenich it was close to super cub performance and still 20 MPH faster.
-
Bush Buggy offline
-
Posts:
42
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2017 5:30 pm
- Location: whitehorse
- Aircraft: Maule and Cessna 206
-
I'd just stay with the trusted 74" 2 blade. I really don't think you'll gain much STOL performance with the 3 blade. Get a ground adjustable 2 blade sensenich and fly the pants off it.
-
A1Skinner offline


-
Posts:
5186
- Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 11:38 am
- Location: Eaglesham
- FindMeSpot URL: [url:1vzmrq4a]http://share.findmespot.com/shared/faces/viewspots.jsp?glId=0az97SSJm2Ky58iEMJLqgaAQvVxMnGp6G[/url:1vzmrq4a]
- Aircraft: Cessna P206A, AT402/502/602
-
Bush Buggy wrote:....We used to have one and it was a awesome little plane pitched to a 72 on a 74 inch sensenich it was close to super cub performance and still 20 MPH faster.
I'm guessing that your 72 pitch is a typo?
Mine came with a 52, worked well but would wind more over redline than I wanted.
I ended up running a 54+ which was perfect.
-
hotrod180 offline


-
Posts:
10534
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
- Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!
DISPLAY OPTIONS
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests