I've been watching the Sierra Club thread, and apart from my disappointment that it evolved from my post about my favorite beer, can't help but think that some of you enjoy arguing about politics more than you enjoy talking about airplanes. Some topics certainly bring the low timers out of the woodwork.
From a certain perspective, the fact that we are enjoying topics of conversation apart from flying shows that this place is more of a community, capable of interests apart from the cornerstone. But some of the topics can be quite polarizing, just like any that pits "right" against "left." In my opinion, partisan politics is a fool's game.
I'm not saying the Sierra Club is a totally irrelevant issue, because it is very relevant. But it is intimately tied to politics.
I won't stop you from sharing your opinions, even though they may differ from mine. But I will remind you guys that the person you're flaming is a real person, and likely someone you will meet in person in the future. Before you pull out your best zinger or insult, ask yourself if you would say the same to the person's face. Before resorting to insults, such as calling someone's politics a "mental disorder" pause and consider if you would say that before a live audience and expect any kind of respect.
I've gotten into it with people and moderators on other forums before, such that my anger stayed with me long after I left the computer. That's just not right. I visit these forums for enjoyment and enlightenment. I'm drawn because I'm interested in sharing information about my hobbby. There are much better forums for arguing politics, just as it's better to argue politics with strangers rather than your friends and family.
So my advice is to keep it friendly and always take the high road in your style of rhetoric. Personal insults only prove that the one doing the insulting can't address the real issue.
Finally, I don't want to have to create an opt-in group like on SuperCub.org so that you guys can argue and piss each other off.


