Backcountry Pilot • Building near an existing airport!?

Building near an existing airport!?

Discuss the legality of flying the backcountry, FARs, advocacy, and aviation relevant legislation. Registered users only.
16 postsPage 1 of 1

Building near an existing airport!?

See the picture....I'm craning up trusses on a new 26 home subdivision. Looks like an airpark, right? Not! It's a new residential subdivision in Blackfoot Idaho, and the airport is right across the street. At one point, during a lull in the work, I called the city planners, and told them who I was, what I was doing, and how come " these airplanes were flying so close to me?" Before I could get a response I told them I was first and foremost a pilot, and just wondered if the people building this house like airplanes....they better! I was told by the city person that this issue had been addressed, and "something" was put in the permit language to dissuade future homeowners from bitching, let's hope so. Planes on short final for 01 were so close.... that except for a designated airpark type development I have never seen the like.....for Joe Sixpack and the Missus, they just better like airplanes is all I can say. I will keep a close eye on this and bring down the wrath of God on the first homeowner who complains :D Maybe more of the gen pub like airplanes then I imagine, we'll see.
Image
courierguy offline
User avatar
Posts: 4197
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Idaho
"Its easier to apologize then ask permission"
Tex McClatchy

Re: Building near an existing airport!?

I’ve been scratching my head over that one. Seems like the planners are pretty short sighted to develop that area with houses. What are you going to do though...small town politics.
whee offline
User avatar
Posts: 3386
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 1:59 pm
Location: SE Idaho

Re: Building near an existing airport!?

I was hoping you'd chime in, being a local, almost. When I first saw the dirt work I figured it was light commercial, not residential. Let's hope all 26 homes are for pilots!
courierguy offline
User avatar
Posts: 4197
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Idaho
"Its easier to apologize then ask permission"
Tex McClatchy

Re: Building near an existing airport!?

I can't speak for the city's local zoning rules for building in the airport's flight path, but it appears they had the surveying company run the 30+ homesites all the way up to the FAA for evaluation for impact to flight procedures. Ultimately is was determined that there was "No Impact to Navigation' and the houses would be listed as "Low Close-In Obstacles" for departure planning. You can read the entire evaluation here on the
OE/AAA site:
https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/searchAction.jsp?action=displayOECase&oeCaseID=364374884&row=18
MTNWEST offline
User avatar
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 2:24 pm
Location: Denver
Aircraft: C-180B

Re: Building near an existing airport!?

Well that airport is doomed.

I seem to recall that it never got a lot of use to begin with, what with being between IDA and PHC...seems the last time I landed there they fueled me out of a portable 100 gallon gas trailer, and I was just lucky someone was around to do it.

I'd love to believe the airport and the sub-devision will coexist, but they won't. The home owners, and the realtors, and the developers and the banks that they suckle off of will bitch and scream and stomp their feet, and the easiest and most lucrative course of action for the city will be to close the airport and build more homes on the graves of the tie-downs.
Hammer offline
KB and Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2094
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 9:15 am
Location: 742 Evergreen Terrace

Re: Building near an existing airport!?

Legal evolution, outside the Constitution, is hard and expensive to deter. The city airport at Carthege, Missouri was a good one and willed perpetual. The donor's children sold out the dead father and it is now a Wal-Mart Supercenter.

It seems sometimes we are less a country of laws and more a country of lawyers.
contactflying offline
Posts: 4972
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:36 pm
Location: Aurora, Missouri 2H2
Download my free "https://tinyurl.com/Safe-Maneuvering" e-book.

Re: Building near an existing airport!?

Unfortunately Hammer is probably right. The Blackfoot airport is actually pretty busy for a small town airfield and is pretty well liked by the city officials but there are lots of complaints about it from people that aren’t pilots. There is a fuel pump and a pretty nice pilot lounge. They really need to make the pump self-serve though.

Similar situation in Rexburg. They are currently looking for a new location for the airport.
whee offline
User avatar
Posts: 3386
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 1:59 pm
Location: SE Idaho

Re: Building near an existing airport!?

A recorded avigation easement can be useful in fighting the noise NIMBYs who will move in. It's a good defense against B.S. nuisance claims, but in the long run nothing can solve nimby politics if money wants the airport land.
CAVU offline
User avatar
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 4:54 pm

Re: Building near an existing airport!?

Folks who build near airports love airplanes and would never dream of complaining about airplane noise. Just ask all the happy residents of Santa Monica how much they love SMO 8)
TOA-Cub offline
User avatar
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:27 pm
Location: Redondo Beach
Aircraft: 1938 Piper J3 Cub; it's what God would fly
WARNING: My posts usually contain strong language (which may be unsuitable for children), unusual humor (which may be unsuitable for adults) and advanced mathematics (which may be unsuitable for liberal arts majors)

Re: Building near an existing airport!?

The thread title reminded me of Vista Field in Kennewick, WA.

Vista field 1955
Image

2017 RIP
Image
Last edited by tcj on Sat Nov 17, 2018 9:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
tcj offline
User avatar
Posts: 1278
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 12:52 pm
Location: Ellensburg, WA
tcj

Re: Building near an existing airport!?

whee wrote:Unfortunately Hammer is probably right. The Blackfoot airport is actually pretty busy for a small town airfield and is pretty well liked by the city officials but there are lots of complaints about it from people that aren’t pilots. There is a fuel pump and a pretty nice pilot lounge. They really need to make the pump self-serve though.

Similar situation in Rexburg. They are currently looking for a new location for the airport.


Jon,

Check the price of a “secure” card lock system these days. You’ll be amazed. I’m amazed that there are still any fuel vendors out there.

MTV
mtv offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 10514
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Bozeman

Re: Building near an existing airport!?

A subdivision was permitted just south of the Rexburg, Idaho Airport that was developed by the city attorney, go figure. Add a daily UPS flight as well as complaints, and it is now on the FAA's radar to be moved. The two local FBO's will not follow as well as most of the local hangar owners. It will be ghost town without services, it will take a few years, but Blackfoot will follow the same path. I love progress.
robertc offline
User avatar
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 10:38 pm
Location: On the Snake River

Re: Building near an existing airport!?

Spot on with the Vista Field comparison!
VTOSS offline
User avatar
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2018 9:47 am
Location: Anchorage
Aircraft: 1956 Cessna 182

DHC-2, DHC-8, E175
BH429/407/206, MD500/530

Re: Building near an existing airport!?

Washington has some sort of regulation that land use near airports mustn't be incompatible with the airport.
It hasn't seemed to stop houses being built near airports or under traffic patterns / traffic flow though.
We had a bunch of noise complainers near my airport a few years ago,
the county decided maybe all the properties affected by airport noise needed to have their titles ammeded to say so.
Since they figured that would devalue their properties if & when they sold them,
all the complainers decided that the airport didn't cause a noise problem after all.
Pretty funny to hear them about-facing at a public meeting about this issue.
hotrod180 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 10534
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!

Re: Building near an existing airport!?

TOA-Cub wrote:Folks who build near airports love airplanes and would never dream of complaining about airplane noise. Just ask all the happy residents of Santa Monica how much they love SMO 8)


Copy that.

I was based out of Vista until it was ruined and I moved the plane to Richland.

All the 'beautiful' development they planned?

It's been years. Nothing but tumbleweeds and hangars falling apart.

Small town politics indeed.
Mountain Doctor offline
User avatar
Posts: 641
Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 3:33 pm
Location: Richland
Aircraft: Maule MXT-7 180A

Re: Building near an existing airport!?

Huh, to my surprise, looked at from the air today, the new place I worked on doesn't look that close! Though a plane could taxi on the over run up to the fence and get a lot closer, that is unlikely. The restaurant in the foreground has an outdoor seating area, and word is the planes on short final are a big hit with the customers, almost a feature of the joint, positive in other words.

I really need to see about cleaning my phone's camera lense, what a crappy pic.
Image
courierguy offline
User avatar
Posts: 4197
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Idaho
"Its easier to apologize then ask permission"
Tex McClatchy

DISPLAY OPTIONS

16 postsPage 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base