Coyote Ugly wrote:Watch the movie Cherry 2000, It's a crappy B movie, but has a Champ on Airstreaks.

Is it just me, or is it amazing how bushwheels just make any plane look better.
Just a comment here, albeit a different plane.
I have flown both 29" and 26" on my Rans S-7S. I know the opinion of others who have done the same. For the Rans, I have also come to the conclusion that the 26" is the best fit. Few reasons that this is MY OPINION (it may be different for a champ). Caveat, my 29" are not airstreaks, but the standard older nylon chord ABW - so a little heaver than the airstreak 29 (3lb per tire heavier) and maybe a little stiffer.
What I like about the 29"s: Higher AOA, more prop clearance. They really slow you down quick transition to approach. They look better. I have not landed on 6" rocks, so no experience there.
What I don't like about the 29": They affect the handling of the plane - not as crisp. The is a big weight diff. between the 26 and 29 - 10lbs/tire! They also are heavy on spring-type gear, causing a good amount of fore/aft "shimmy" in certain situations - this is not transferable to the champ. The rolling resistance is fairly high, and I think I get off the ground sooner on the 26". I think overall the directional control is slightly better on the 26", but not a really big differenc.
Overall, I think the 26" is every bit as good at overcoming rough ground as the 29, FOR WHAT I HAVE EXPOSED them too. Rough pastures, small-rock bars, and for sure anything in Idaho that is a "strip" - Vines, Mile High, etc - heck you can do any of those places with 850's or even 800's.
So I would think about the type of flying you really see yourself doing. If you really plan on going ROUGH, go with 29"s. If you want to land in the pastures/fields, hillsides, gravel bars, etc. - keep the plane lighter - the 26" is MORE than adequate.