AKGrouch wrote:After the cost of the conversion, repaint, self done interior reupholstry, used 180 lyc, fixed pitch prop to save $ rather than a constant speed prop, 8.50's on the mains with Cleveland double puck brakes, 30 gal. extended fuel, etc, you can have one heck of a nice 180.
The only fair way is to compare tailwheel conversion itself, and not throw a bunch other factors into it to skew the value analysis.
In fairness, assume that you start with either an old ugly nosewheel airplane with a 360 channel Heathkit avionics suite, or a freshly restored nosewheel airplane with a Garmin 5000 known icing panel and leather interior.
Then assume when it is all over you have the SAME old ugly or restored airplane you started with but now it has a tailwheel. Compare the costs on that, and nothing but that.
If you decide to have an old sad peeling paint job stripped and gold plated, or upgrade the panel, or put in a whole new freakin' engine and propeller... keep that separate from the value analysis of the landing gear upgrade.
(This is
not aimed at AK Grouch personally, I have no idea what he spent or where he spent it). If you drop off your 1956 172 at Beverly Hills Ferrari and Antique Airplane Restoration Boutique, and tell them to do whatever it takes... at $100/hr shop rate plus buying the parts from Cessna at retail... and they take three years to do it, and you get a bill for $350,000... your 172 is still not worth $350,000.
Of Course it would have been cheaper to buy a previously restored 172 for $35,000 that someone wisely spent $20,000 on restoring.
Remember when you'd see an ad in Trade-a-Plane, and the ad said "World's best Ercoupe, multiple trophies, $93,000 in receipts but you can STEAL IT for only $67,500!!!!!!"
Whatever you guys do, don't ever buy a new radio, or a bigger GPS, or bigger tires, or vortex generators, or Millennium cylinders, or an Eagle engine conversion for your airplane.
Sell your airplane and go buy one that has already had all that stuff done...