Backcountry Pilot • Cessna 175 tailwheel?

Cessna 175 tailwheel?

A general forum for anything related to flying the backcountry. Please check first if your new topic fits better into a more specific forum before posting.
67 postsPage 4 of 41, 2, 3, 4

Re: Cessna 175 tailwheel?

mtv wrote:I’ve only flown one Cessna with a swept tail that’d been converted to tailwheel. I was not impressed, and I would NOT go there. Rudder authority was definitely lacking. I’ve also heard this from others as well, pilots who I trust.

MTV

Plus, they just look funny with the swept tail and the 'omni-vision'.
C180_guy offline
Posts: 488
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:56 pm
Location: Norcal

Re: Cessna 175 tailwheel?

C180_guy wrote:
allPrimes wrote:Also, as of 2020-10-08, it didn't have ADSB but that's not mentioned in the barnstormers ad.

I see that as a positive


Legit curious: why?

Like I wrote earlier, I’m new to GA and going through a steep learning curve.
allPrimes offline
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 11:29 am
Location: Bozeman
Aircraft: Club C172/180. Still defining the mission for a (potential) future purchase!

Re: Cessna 175 tailwheel?

allPrimes wrote:
C180_guy wrote:
allPrimes wrote:Also, as of 2020-10-08, it didn't have ADSB but that's not mentioned in the barnstormers ad.

I see that as a positive


Legit curious: why?

Like I wrote earlier, I’m new to GA and going through a steep learning curve.


He's of the opinion that it's an overreach of government to mandate ADS-B, which is effectively logged aircraft tracking. There are technical intricacies that make "anonymous" mode not so anonymous with certain installations and handling of the protocol.

Others feel the benefits outweigh the negatives like above. Traffic alerts, collision avoidance, flight following, free weather data.

In the context of an aircraft purchase, it requires equipment purchase decisions be made, and if it's already done for you then you lose out on those decisions. On the other hand, it's labor and cost you don't need to be troubled with.
Zzz offline
Janitorial Staff
User avatar
Posts: 2855
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: northern
Aircraft: Swiveling desk chair
Half a century spent proving “it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

Re: Cessna 175 tailwheel?

Zzz wrote:
allPrimes wrote:
C180_guy wrote:
allPrimes wrote:Also, as of 2020-10-08, it didn't have ADSB but that's not mentioned in the barnstormers ad.

I see that as a positive


Legit curious: why?

Like I wrote earlier, I’m new to GA and going through a steep learning curve.


He's of the opinion that it's an overreach of government to mandate ADS-B, which is effectively logged aircraft tracking. There are technical intricacies that make "anonymous" mode not so anonymous with certain installations and handling of the protocol.

Others feel the benefits outweigh the negatives like above. Traffic alerts, collision avoidance, flight following, free weather data.

In the context of an aircraft purchase, it requires equipment purchase decisions be made, and if it's already done for you then you lose out on those decisions. On the other hand, it's labor and cost you don't need to be troubled with.


I can think of a few reasons off the top of my head that especially in Alaska having ADS-B out installed may actually devalue the airplane:
1 - Alaskans are very protective of their favorite hunting/fishing locations, sometimes spending years "developing" a remote strip and want to keep it for themselves.
2 - Additional safety is unproven - its primary design wasn't to aid in safety (TCAS already did that), but for aircraft surveillance. I noticed pilots with ADS-B out tend to stay quiet on the radio (need more data to verify though), while also spending less time looking out the window (verified). For example I noticed that I spend more time trying to find the targets already seen on the ADS-B in box, then looking elsewhere (need to change that!). Also see this: https://www.alaskapublic.org/2019/05/15 ... ent-wrong/
3 - FAA badgering - there was a recent discussion on Alaska pilot's facebook group about guys getting badgered by the FAA because their signal was getting lost (i.e. flying low, around terrain, etc.).
4 - Landing fees - already started (https://www.planeandpilotmag.com/articl ... ds-b-data/).
5 - Once installed, you can't uninstall.

Therefore, being in Alaska, and not in required ADS-B out rule airspace, if I had a choice of with or without ADS-B out, I would choose without, everything else being equal of course.
AKclimber offline
Posts: 214
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:24 pm
Location: Alaska

Re: Cessna 175 tailwheel?

AKclimber wrote:5 - Once installed, you can't uninstall.


There is nothing in the regulation that I've seen which prevents one from "uninstalling" an ADS-B unit.....depending on the unit, however, it might be costly.

MTV
mtv offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 10515
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Bozeman

Re: Cessna 175 tailwheel?

I can think of a few reasons off the top of my head that especially in Alaska having ADS-B out installed may actually devalue the airplane:
1 - Alaskans are very protective of their favorite hunting/fishing locations, sometimes spending years "developing" a remote strip and want to keep it for themselves.


Makes sense. Hell, I don't even like sharing my huckleberry and morel harvesting spots, let alone my small-stream trout honey holes, and I found those on foot.

2 - Additional safety is unproven - its primary design wasn't to aid in safety (TCAS already did that), but for aircraft surveillance. I noticed pilots with ADS-B out tend to stay quiet on the radio (need more data to verify though), while also spending less time looking out the window (verified). For example I noticed that I spend more time trying to find the targets already seen on the ADS-B in box, then looking elsewhere (need to change that!). Also see this: https://www.alaskapublic.org/2019/05/15 ... ent-wrong/


Funny you say this. My CFI keeps his iPad with foreflight and traffic on his knee. When BZN Approach gives us a traffic advisory, my eyes are out the window but his head goes down. From your link, clearly there are more than a few pilots that consider ADSB + foreflight as the be-all, end-all of traffic avoidance rather than their eyeballs.

Therefore, being in Alaska, and not in required ADS-B out rule airspace, if I had a choice of with or without ADS-B out, I would choose without, everything else being equal of course.


All of your points make sense. If my mission were only in D, low, inshore E, or G, I doubt I'd consider it either. Thanks for laying out your reasons.
Last edited by allPrimes on Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
allPrimes offline
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 11:29 am
Location: Bozeman
Aircraft: Club C172/180. Still defining the mission for a (potential) future purchase!

Re: Cessna 175 tailwheel?

mtv wrote:
AKclimber wrote:5 - Once installed, you can't uninstall.

There is nothing in the regulation that I've seen which prevents one from "uninstalling" an ADS-B unit.....depending on the unit, however, it might be costly. MTV


Once removed, no reason why you can't re-sell the ADS-B to recoup some of your expense.
At least some of them are easily user-programmable.

I'm not a big fan of ADS-B in, or out,
but chose to install ADS-B out because of my proximity to and frequent flights through "rule airspace".
I installed a cheapie ADS-B in unit, I'm undecided on whether it's an advantage or a distraction.
At this point, it's kind of a push I think.
hotrod180 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 10534
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!

DISPLAY OPTIONS

Previous
67 postsPage 4 of 41, 2, 3, 4

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base