Backcountry Pilot • Cylinder Lubrication Question???

Cylinder Lubrication Question???

Lycoming, Continental, Hartzell, McCauley, or any broad spectrum drive system component used on multiple type.
11 postsPage 1 of 1

Cylinder Lubrication Question???

Question is: "Are piston aircraft engines designed to have fuel lubricate any part of the cylinder? If so is there somewhere I can find this engineering data in black and white?"

As far as I understand, engines are lubricated by oil...Cylinders rely on oil for lubrication just like the rest of the engine? Some IA's I know say anyone that believes that fuel lubricates anything are not well versed on how an engine works, while some other IA's vehemently insist that you must dowse the cylinder with extra gas to lubricate the top end...???

Will someone out there please help lay this one to bed? Is there any validity to this claim that fuel lubricates anything?

-Thanks
Skalywag offline
User avatar
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 12:52 pm
Location: Big Bend, TX

Re: Cylinder Lubrication Question???

Skalywag wrote:Question is: "Are piston aircraft engines designed to have fuel lubricate any part of the cylinder? If so is there somewhere I can find this engineering data in black and white?"

As far as I understand, engines are lubricated by oil...Cylinders rely on oil for lubrication just like the rest of the engine? Some IA's I know say anyone that believes that fuel lubricates anything are not well versed on how an engine works, while some other IA's vehemently insist that you must dowse the cylinder with extra gas to lubricate the top end...???

Will someone out there please help lay this one to bed? Is there any validity to this claim that fuel lubricates anything?

-Thanks


Lead in avgas buffers the exhaust valves at the seats. This could be mistaken for lubrication.
Scolopax offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 1696
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Nottingham
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... 4aYqSexnZC

Re: Cylinder Lubrication Question???

Skalywag wrote:Question is: "Are piston aircraft engines designed to have fuel lubricate any part of the cylinder?
As far as I understand, engines are lubricated by oil...Cylinders rely on oil for lubrication just like the rest of the engine? Some IA's I know say anyone that believes that fuel lubricates anything are not well versed on how an engine works, while some other IA's vehemently insist that you must dowse the cylinder with extra gas to lubricate the top end...???

Is there any validity to this claim that fuel lubricates anything?

-Thanks


IMO
100 LL has some lead. I have been told in the old days lead was good for valve guide lubrication.
The MOGAS STC on my Maule calls for one tank of 100LL every 75 hours. So I guess it still helps
Cylinders No.
Anything else No.
IMO

G'Day
OregonMaule offline
User avatar
Posts: 6977
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 9:44 pm
Location: Orygun
My SPOT page

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety". Ben Franklin
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin

Re: Cylinder Lubrication Question???

I don't think you'll be able to easily find a definitive answer in some engineering specification. That stuff can be hard to come by.

Some observations from a layperson - one difference between fuel and oil at normal CHT - the oil remains liquid at that temperature, whereas the fuel would vaporise? Hard to do much lubricating as a vapour I'd have guessed.

The 'theory' behind the question sounds like a poorly concocted argument against running an engine lean, but running lean has been proven not to harm to an engine when done correctly. So that kinda puts a big hole in the argument?

2c
Battson offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 1810
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:19 pm
Location: New Zealand
Aircraft: Bearhawk 4-place
IO-540 260hp

Re: Cylinder Lubrication Question???

Thanks Scolopax and OregonMaule. I've heard about lead being necessary for breaking in the older style valve seats, but do not understand exactly what the difference is between the older and newer valve seats relating to the necessity of lead?

Battson, you hit the nail on the head, I am trying to get to the bottom of this "fuel lubrication" theory? #-o

This is a webinar from Mike Busch about Cylinders that's worth watching IMO:

http://www.eaavideo.org/video.aspx?v=1204537102001
Skalywag offline
User avatar
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 12:52 pm
Location: Big Bend, TX

Re: Cylinder Lubrication Question???

Lead doesn't do a whole lot for modern engines. Hardened valve seats took care of any small valve recession problem. I flew a 60's vintage Lyc for hundreds of hours on unleaded with no problems. It had the original seats, etc. I was told it was the road to ruin, but after a few decades of the homebuilt crowd doing the same thing, I think the verdict is out.

Another thing I found curious was that the old 80 octane that many planes were certified under had a lot less lead than the modern 100LL-- about 1/2 to 1/5 as much. I've been told that the explanation for this has little to do with the lubrication requirements for 100LL, and more to do with the antiknock characteristics of TEL.

Apparently, volume for volume, it is hard to beat TEL to boost the octane rating, and it is somewhat more expensive, toxic, or both to create additives that can maintain the antiknock rating without reducing the chemical energy of the fuel or increasing the vapor pressure significantly.

I haven't really heard anyone hang a broken engine on unleaded vs leaded yet.
lesuther offline
Posts: 1429
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:26 pm
Location: CO

Re: Cylinder Lubrication Question???

I remembered reading a post on another aircraft forum, which sounded like it came from years of experience. I'll repost it here:

The cylinder and pistons and rings need very, very little oil compared to the rest of the engine, and in most applications they get far too much. Oil shot into the bottom of the piston by holes in con rod caps, for instance, is for cooling, not lubrication.

Oil rings can only control so much oil. If too much is flung into the cylinder, the rings begin to hydroplane on it and oil consumption goes way up, along with the spark plug fouling and valve stem coking and sticking that comes with burning oil. The risk of destructive detonation also goes way up when oil is part of the combustion process.

I spent 12 years in the compressor rebuilding business. Oil control is critical in air compressors, since it will contaminate the whole air brake system with sticky varnish and will cause serious coking and clogging of the discharge passages in the cylinder head. Since there is no combustion happening in there, any oil getting past the rings causes serious trouble. I found that by sticking closely to the manufacturer's bearing clearance specifications I could keep the oil pumping troubles to almost nothing, and warranty claims for oil pumping dropped right down to nothing.

The trick is to keep those clearances very close so that much less oil escapes the bearings to be flung into the cylinder. The crosshatch in the cylinder wall, as microscopic as it is, holds enough oil for piston and ring lube and will not release the oil into the combustion process (in the engine) or into pumped air (in the compressor). The cooler cylinder wall prevents most of the very thin bit of oil from being boiled off.

If the compressor suffered an oil-supply failure, the bearings always failed first, long before the pistons or rings ever seized.

So we need to reduce the amount of oil getting past the rings, not increase it. We don't need much. Aircraft engines will use more oil not because they're dinosaurs but because they're air cooled, and so their temperature range is much larger than a liquid-cooled engine, so the clearances must be larger. Ring gaps and piston-to-cylinder clearances in the Lyc or Continental will be bigger than in your typical Toyota, for sure, and it will use more oil than the Toyota. Yet, when I replaced the Lycs in the fleet, i always followed to the letter the break-in procedures provided by Lycoming and we seldom had to add oil between 50-hour inspections. Many guys will baby a new or overhauled engine, exactly the wrong thing to do, and it will use far too much oil. That engine need high pressures and temperatures to get the rings and cylinders to seat properly, a nice way of saying that they must grind away at each other until they mate closely. Babying it results in the rings riding on high spots that get glazed and shiny and hard, leaving gaps where the cylinder has low spots, so that oil sneaks past the rings and gets into the combustion chamber. The wear stops once the glazing happens and the engine forever after uses oil. It's not, as I say, an old-technology problem; it's an engine-operation problem.

Dan Thomas
Battson offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 1810
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:19 pm
Location: New Zealand
Aircraft: Bearhawk 4-place
IO-540 260hp

Re: Cylinder Lubrication Question???

Dousing the cylinder with gas (solvent) is a good way to wash the oil (lubrication) off the cylinder/piston and is not beneficial at all. Read metal to metal with little or no lube [-X
Glidergeek offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 1937
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:02 pm
Location: Hesperia
Aircraft: 1968 P206C
DG 400

Re: Cylinder Lubrication Question???

Battson, good post. Everything that guy said is true.
Reminded me of the small gaps and clearances when installing the correct side rings on a new piston.
http://wiseco.com/PDFs/Manuals/RingEndGap.pdf
UngaWunga offline
Posts: 360
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 8:29 am
Location: Hampton

Re: Cylinder Lubrication Question???

Lead was added to gasoline for two reasons:

1. To cushion the impact between the valves and valve seats
2. To act as an anti-knock agent

In warbird radial aircraft engines, for reasons unknown to me, lead has a tendency to build up on valve stems and cause valves to stick, generally in the open position. Perhaps it's the type of material the 70+ year old valves were made of. Modern, certified lead removers are not recommended in these engines as they are too aggressive on some of the carburetor components. Marvel Mystery Oil is generally used in its place.

I suspect the more modern, 40 year old flat engines may have experienced similar problems, hence the creation of certified lead remover, but that is just a guess on my part.
Barnstormer offline
Posts: 2700
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:42 am
Location: Alaska
Aircraft: C185

Re: Cylinder Lubrication Question???

LL will help with the valve seats but will also build up on the stem and cause problems as noted. Run LL on break in than running blended fuel or just mogas with occasional LL should be just fine. Adding MMO to the fuel every now and then is also recommended to prevent valves from sticking. The only time fuel is used as lube for piston and rings is when blended with oil in 2 strokes. Extra fuel at full RPM will help cool. I work in the medical field so this advice is worth what you paid for it. :D
DENNY
DENNY offline
Posts: 773
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2013 7:16 pm
Location: CHUGIAK
DENNY

DISPLAY OPTIONS

11 postsPage 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base