I know of several AVCON converted airplanes in northern AK that were field approved to remove the electric fuel pump. To do so, however, either on the 170 or 172, required the removal and replacement of the section of fuel line that runs from the fuel selector forward to the gascolator with a larger diameter line. That line, in original configuration, cannot provide sufficient fuel flow to meet the certification requirements without being boosted by a fuel pump.
I can't recal whether they removed BOTH fuel pumps (mechanical and electric), but I believe they did in these conversions. They went to a pure gravity feed system.
The fellow who was field approving these offered to write me up a FA, but I never saw all that much benefit to doing so, so never took him up on it.
The ELECTRIC fuel pump in these installations is purely a BACK UP to the mechanical fuel pump. The only reason you would ever actually USE the electric pump is in the event that the mechanical pump failed....a rare instance.
The reason you're admonished to energize the electric pump for takeoff and landing is that if, while close to the ground, the mechanical pump were to fail, you won't have very long to energize that electric pump and get fuel moving again. Frankly, with these setups, I doubt the engine would flat quit if the pump failed, but it probably woulnd't make full power, so especially on a challenging takeoff, that could be ugly. So, we energize the electric pump prior to takeoff and any time operating close to the ground. You shouldn't notice any change in fuel pressure, and for intents and purposes, you wont' know whether the electric pump is running or not, at least in flight.
MTV