Ok, over an hour and no reply...I'll shoot...with a fairly ambiguous post.
I'd say incomplete logs are not going to devalue the aircraft that much unless it's the most recent ones that have been lost. If there's only one book and it contained all the maintenance entries, yeah it's going to take a hit. But is there real intrinsic value to complete logbooks, or is it just a perceived thing that carries more weight in a sale than it should?
Here's a
thread from the 170 site on this topic.
I know a guy who rebuilt a 180 from a mere husk of an aircraft, and had zero logbooks. His IA assembled logbooks that included the refurbishment procedures, what was done, etc. I'm not sure what they did about the TTAF though. One can never really know what the airframe has been though. If someone rebuilds an aircraft from a project like that, can you assume its airworthiness is greater or less than one that has complete logs but has been sitting on the ramp for years and been flown seldom?
I think as the seller you are going to get what someone is willing to pay. If logbooks are important to them, you may have to concede some value, because many people heavily consider the investment potential of an aircraft, or at least what they can resell it for. It can also seem like a shady way to possibly conceal something about the aircraft, if the logbooks are "conveniently" lost. Perhaps a really nice aircraft that is in good condition, and is allowed to be thoroughly annualed as a pre-buy...the lost logbooks aren't the biggest deal. I don't think they should really be considered pedigrees, just maintenance records. That's my $.01.
Read the TIC170 thread, there are some interesting opinions.
My logs seem very complete...to my knowledge. There's no way i could know if something is missing even if it was. I did enjoy reading them and kind of absorbing some of the history of the aircraft and its adventures in the last 54 years. I even connected with one of the former Canadian owners, who is now a member on this site.