Backcountry Pilot • Narrowing down the STOL choices.......

Narrowing down the STOL choices.......

Technical and practical discussion about specific aircraft types such as Cessna 180, Maule M7, et al. Please read and search carefully before posting, as many popular topics have already been discussed.
29 postsPage 2 of 21, 2

Re: Narrowing down the STOL choices.......

Whee, had a 235 hp with a cut down Q tip prop from a lycoming powered Bonanza the had a tow bar make the q tips look ugly. :shock: ended up with short blades but real fat, pulled really well, and was very quiet. =D>
It also spun up about 250 rpm more than most :mrgreen:
GT
M6RV6 offline
User avatar
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:52 pm
Location: Rice Wa. 82WN Magee Creek AERODROME
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... sWKXuhKlg2
Have as much Fun as is Safe, and Keep SMILIN! GT,

Re: Narrowing down the STOL choices.......

whee wrote:Hey GT, what engine did you have in the M6?


I was wondering the same thing, Whee beat me to it. I like to hear stories like this!
Old Yeller offline
User avatar
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:17 pm
Location: PNW

Re: Narrowing down the STOL choices.......

M6RV6 wrote: Ground handling on a Cessna has more to do with getting the caster and camber of the mains correct, Just like with converting a pa22-20 if the axles aren't right it's a bear to handle. .........


Not talking about squirrely handling, talking about lazy steering while taxiing. Different issue.
I do all my steering with brake-assist, goes through the pads a little quicker that way but they're cheap & easy to replace.
hotrod180 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 10534
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!

Re: Narrowing down the STOL choices.......

The first few hours in my 182tw I thought it was squirrelly compared to my Stinson.
I think it was just a different plane and I was getting used to it, after more time in the seat it is very solid on the ground.
Same with going to bigger tires.
Terry offline
User avatar
Posts: 1365
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 9:11 pm
Location: Willamette Valley
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... 4GzPHI6t1d

Re: Narrowing down the STOL choices.......

Terri
You were right, everything is squarely compared to a Stinson!! :mrgreen:
GT
M6RV6 offline
User avatar
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:52 pm
Location: Rice Wa. 82WN Magee Creek AERODROME
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... sWKXuhKlg2
Have as much Fun as is Safe, and Keep SMILIN! GT,

Re: Narrowing down the STOL choices.......

M6RV6 wrote:Terri
You were right, everything is squarely compared to a Stinson!! :mrgreen:
GT


Hey, just because I'm flying a bastard child 180 doesn't mean you have to put an i on the end of my name. :P
Terry offline
User avatar
Posts: 1365
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 9:11 pm
Location: Willamette Valley
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... 4GzPHI6t1d

Re: Narrowing down the STOL choices.......

RWM wrote:I just wanted to throw in a plug for the little Maule. I have been flying my M4-210 for about 200 hours now and I can allow that it is an excellent, economical 2 place plane and a fairly capable 4 place plane.

With one or two aboard it is a STOL plane (however, not a cub) that will get up or down in 500-700'...less with wind or in standard conditions. Mine has a respectable cruise speed of 125 kts, a 975 lb useful load and burns 11.5 gal/hr in cruise. Of course you can sacrifice some speed and get the burn down substantially. With it's short wings, tailwheel, and 210 hp, it is addictingly fun to fly and will go most of the places the Cub or Husky will. My most fun times of flying it are when I'm by myself. When light it's a kick in the ass!

On the four place aspect, just last weekend, I loaded up my wife and another couple, bags, and 30 gal of fuel (within legal gross weight), left off my dirt strip and flew 250nm to a college football game. Didn't get there as fast as a 180 would have, probably only about 10 min later, but we did get there...and back. So it can do it and it does a decent job at it. The majority of the time, the back seat is out and there is lots of room for hauling stuff.

It was really easy to transition into and with 1000 hrs already under your belt, it would probably be a walk in the park for you. It seems to be an honest airplane with good manners. No surprises, yet anyway. The best part about it is that you could buy one, get all the good mods, put it on bushwheels, and have tons of that $150K left over for gas money.


Great info!! I appreciate it.......and would use my plane very similarly.
lonestar offline
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:15 am
Location: Prince George

Re: Narrowing down the STOL choices.......

Hello! Just wanted to thank everyone for their input and advise thus far as it has been very helpful. For any of you who have had any experience with a Maule M4 210 Rocket ., what are they like??? There is one nearby me for sale . Cheers,

Lonny
lonestar offline
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:15 am
Location: Prince George

Re: Narrowing down the STOL choices.......

lonestar wrote:Hello! Just wanted to thank everyone for their input and advise thus far as it has been very helpful. For any of you who have had any experience with a Maule M4 210 Rocket ., what are they like??? There is one nearby me for sale . Cheers,

Lonny

Contact SuperMaule, he likes his!!
Terry, Sorry about that, I send about 6 emails a day to my purchasingagentdispatcherbookkeeperit person, Terri.
GT :oops:
M6RV6 offline
User avatar
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:52 pm
Location: Rice Wa. 82WN Magee Creek AERODROME
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... sWKXuhKlg2
Have as much Fun as is Safe, and Keep SMILIN! GT,

DISPLAY OPTIONS

Previous
29 postsPage 2 of 21, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base