New cylinders on p-ponk conti after 550 hrs?
Lycoming, Continental, Hartzell, McCauley, or any broad spectrum drive system component used on multiple type.
Mon Sep 09, 2013 12:49 pm
Starting to look for another 182 and/or 205 after making the mistake on selling my 182. I came across a 61' with the following 600 SMOH P PONK, 50 SNEW TITAN CYLINDERS.
Should it be alarming that there was need for new Titan cylinders after only 550 hrs on the p-ponk?
-
29singlespeed offline
-
Posts:
508
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:10 pm
- Location: Gunnison
-
Probably just a recall/AD on the installed cylinders. If they really cooked all six of the originals I'd investigate further..
-
SixTwoLeemer offline

-
Posts:
1285
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 10:53 am
- Location: Wasatch Front
-
Altitude is Time…. Airspeed is Life!
ECI cylinders eh... Can't believe they lasted that long!
-
River rat offline


-
Posts:
750
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: Saskatchewan Can.
tricycles are for little girls
ccurrie wrote:ECI cylinders eh... Can't believe they lasted that long!
yup
-
Mister701 offline

-
Posts:
2134
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 11:13 pm
- Location: Sparks
- Aircraft: Rans S7LS
-
What's everyone's gripe about ECI cylinders? When the C-145 engine on my C170 was overhauled in 2001, I had them install new ECI "classic cast" steel cylinders. I sold that airplane in 2009 and it was still going strong at 1100 SMOH. I think the lowest cylinder compression was 77/80. The only problem I ever had with it was stuck exhaust valves several hundred hours after the overhaul. I think ECI reamed the guides too tight to avoid the wobbly valve/compression leak syndrome that all the small Continentals seem to suffer from, and enough carbon deposits (or whatever) finally built up for that tight fit to become a problem. I had two stick, which I reamed, then I pulled the rest to check the fit and had to ream one more. All this was with the cylinders still installed, using "the rope trick".
-
hotrod180 offline


-
Posts:
10534
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
- Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!
29singlespeed wrote:Starting to look for another 182 and/or 205 after making the mistake on selling my 182. I came across a 61' with the following 600 SMOH P PONK, 50 SNEW TITAN CYLINDERS.
Should it be alarming that there was need for new Titan cylinders after only 550 hrs on the p-ponk?
They replaced the TCM's with ECI's

Last edited by
Glidergeek on Tue Sep 10, 2013 7:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Glidergeek offline


-
Posts:
1937
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:02 pm
- Location: Hesperia
- Aircraft: 1968 P206C
DG 400
-
ya know, probably one of the "run em hard" crowd...most guys like this dont own what they are flying....i plan on my o540T goin' to 2000 hrs, so i DONT run car gas, and while i do use the power when needed, i do know that these old skool motors only have so much full power hours to give, so when in cruise and such i pull the power back, at the cost of 5 its, drop the fuel burn to 11-12 and keep the temps down...some thing about buying a 540 doesn't thrill me...!
-
jomac offline

-
Posts:
720
- Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:25 pm
- Location: idaho falls, id
-
jomac
Thu Oct 17, 2013 11:33 am
Also if you get serious about this, check to see if there has been a cross over balance tube installed. Some of the earlier conversions may not have had this done. Another issue may be that it needs to have the carb main jet size increased for more flow. A friend of mine had these issues with his motor and after getting it sorted out has been pretty happy. Just don't be stingy with the fuel. It takes fuel to make power! Call Steve Knop at PPonk Aviation. He's friendly and will help you out.
-
RockHopper offline
-
Posts:
213
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 1:11 pm
- Location: North Idaho-Next best thing to AK
DISPLAY OPTIONS
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests