Operating over square?
Lycoming, Continental, Hartzell, McCauley, or any broad spectrum drive system component used on multiple type.
Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:16 pm
O-470....what are the pros and cons in cruse and climb?
I don't run over square, but have been considering it.
I also use auto fuel and that could be a factor. The 91 octane I burn seems adequate?
-
Terry offline

-
Posts:
1365
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 9:11 pm
- Location: Willamette Valley
- FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... 4GzPHI6t1d
Some of what I have heard on newer aircraft engines. I think yours is considered newer Terry. My overhaul company wanted over square for break in. They like their engines run hard every time you take off for the life of the engine. Full throttle even at sea level
Now my opinion as a gearhead my whole life. Aircraft engine 75% to TBO I will take it easier. Mogas on 90* plus days I will take it easier.
Good day
-
OregonMaule offline

-
Posts:
6977
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 9:44 pm
- Location: Orygun
Operating over squared on take off is pretty common, and operating over squared with a turbo variant of the same motor is SOP. I suppose reasonable limits must apply, and some enigine / prop combinations have limitations of their own. For example MT doesn't want you to run beyond 2" over squared on the O-470, but the standard adage of 'don't ever run it over square' is generally something that 250 hr CFI's preach to new commercial pilot candidates because they have yet to understand for themselves the relationship between power and RPM. I suppose they'd shat themselves if they ever saw the MP / RPM in a big round motor :lol
Most engine builders will tell you on an O-470 break in, if you have any doubt what to do with the levers, shove them all fwd

.
Some good reading:
http://www.avweb.com/news/airman/184483-1.html YMMV, Rob
-
Rob offline


-
Posts:
1569
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:34 am
Isn't the concept of "squared" just a coincidental rule of thumb anyway? There's no real mathematical or engineering correlation between manifold pressure expressed in inches of mercury, and RPM in revs per minute. It just works out with our engines that the numbers and their units of measure align and
appear to be power * 100 = rpm, and that happens to be a safe/effective setting. Easy to remember for boobs like me.

-
Zzz offline


-
Posts:
2855
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: northern
- Aircraft: Swiveling desk chair
-
Half a century spent proving “it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”
Thu Apr 05, 2012 10:36 am
Is there a power chart available for the 470 showing the factory approved settings? The usual mention for cruise is 22,23,or 24 squared, or some slightly under-squared variation on this -- 21"/2300 seems popular. I don't know if this is by choice, or by necesity due to no more MP being available at altitude.
-
hotrod180 offline


-
Posts:
10534
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
- Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!
Thu Apr 05, 2012 10:45 am
There is an excellent series of articles on the internet about operating engines. Google "Pelican's Perch, putting it all together". Very informative!
-
Hogy59 offline

-
Posts:
6
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 7:07 pm
- Location: Lebanon, TN
John
MX-7-180B
A good landing you can walk away from. A great landing and the airplane is reuseable.
Thu Apr 05, 2012 10:50 am
I love BCP but when you ask questions like this you open yourself to alot of speculation by non experts like me. The bes thing you can do is Google
http://www.avweb.com/news/pelican/182081-1.html
-
Glidergeek offline


-
Posts:
1937
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:02 pm
- Location: Hesperia
- Aircraft: 1968 P206C
DG 400
-
Thu Apr 05, 2012 11:59 am
-
lesuther offline
-
Posts:
1429
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:26 pm
- Location: CO
-
Thu Apr 05, 2012 12:02 pm
Rob wrote: 'don't ever run it over square' is generally something that 250 hr CFI's preach to new commercial pilot candidates because they have yet to understand for themselves the relationship between power and RPM. I suppose they'd shat themselves if they ever saw the MP / RPM in a big round motor
Haha isn't that true... along with every other fallacy in aviation

-
SixTwoLeemer offline

-
Posts:
1285
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 10:53 am
- Location: Wasatch Front
-
Altitude is Time…. Airspeed is Life!
Right in your POH will be the charts for allowable power settings, and with the normally arpirated O-470 you can "oversquare" all day long.
Gump
-
GumpAir offline

-
Posts:
4557
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:14 am
- Location: Lost somewhere in Nevada
- Aircraft: Old Clunker
-
Vick wrote:^^ Great article link Russ, thanks for posting!
Too much reading for me can you summarize for me Vic

-
Glidergeek offline


-
Posts:
1937
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:02 pm
- Location: Hesperia
- Aircraft: 1968 P206C
DG 400
-
DISPLAY OPTIONS
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest