Backcountry Pilot • P&W R985 OIL

P&W R985 OIL

Lycoming, Continental, Hartzell, McCauley, or any broad spectrum drive system component used on multiple type.
9 postsPage 1 of 1

P&W R985 OIL

Does anybody on here with some time running 985's have any oil opinions?

Brian
TurboStinson offline
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 3:53 pm
Location: Longview
Aircraft: 1967 Piper PA-32-300
1948 Stinson 108-3 250 HP Turbo Franklin Floatplane

Re: P&W R985 OIL

I was only permitted to use Aeroshell W-100 oil for 1200 or so hours on one. Never saw issues, and mechanics were happy.

But, they are just aircraft engines.....run a good quality aviation oil and I doubt you'll go wrong.

MTV
mtv offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 10514
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Bozeman

Re: P&W R985 OIL

Philips 25-60 is the best I have used in many different round engines.

Kurt
G44 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:46 am
Location: Michigan

Re: P&W R985 OIL

Phillips 25-60 is fine... XC is fine, Aeroshell 15-40 is fine. I worked as a tech-rep on these engines for about 3 years in the 90's. Part of that was that when I wasn't on the road, I filled in wherever I was needed in the shop. Usually that was the cylinder shop or buildup, but I spent lots of time in teardown as well. You could tell when an engine came in that was run with Aeroshell or XC...they were so nice and clean inside! (if it was changed with regularity). It was quite the education! The volume I saw and had "hands on" sure made "trends" easy to see. We had a few operators that were still stuck on mineral and straight weight oils...those engines were so messy!
John
hardtailjohn offline
User avatar
Posts: 924
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:06 pm
Location: Marion, Montana
God put me here to accomplish a certain amount of things...right now I'm so far behind, I'll never die!!

Re: P&W R985 OIL

The 985 in my Stearman is approaching 1800 hours. It's had W100 and 25W60, and lately W120 (cause it's leaking so bad). Compressions are still excellent.
Barnstormer offline
Posts: 2700
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:42 am
Location: Alaska
Aircraft: C185

Re: P&W R985 OIL

Barnstormer wrote:The 985 in my Stearman is approaching 1800 hours. It's had W100 and 25W60, and lately W120 (cause it's leaking so bad). Compressions are still excellent.

Assuming that's total time?
clippwagon offline
User avatar
Posts: 737
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 9:49 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: P&W R985 OIL

hardtailjohn wrote:Phillips 25-60 is fine... XC is fine, Aeroshell 15-40 is fine. I worked as a tech-rep on these engines for about 3 years in the 90's. Part of that was that when I wasn't on the road, I filled in wherever I was needed in the shop. Usually that was the cylinder shop or buildup, but I spent lots of time in teardown as well. You could tell when an engine came in that was run with Aeroshell or XC...they were so nice and clean inside! (if it was changed with regularity). It was quite the education! The volume I saw and had "hands on" sure made "trends" easy to see. We had a few operators that were still stuck on mineral and straight weight oils...those engines were so messy!
John


The big question would be how much of the parts went back into each engine? I'm guessing that the nasty ones only needed gaskets. While the clean ones need all new moving parts.
tailwind5sw offline
User avatar
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 10:15 am
Location: ICT
Aircraft: WITTMAN W10

Re: P&W R985 OIL

clippwagon wrote:
Barnstormer wrote:The 985 in my Stearman is approaching 1800 hours. It's had W100 and 25W60, and lately W120 (cause it's leaking so bad). Compressions are still excellent.

Assuming that's total time?

SMOH.
Barnstormer offline
Posts: 2700
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:42 am
Location: Alaska
Aircraft: C185

Re: P&W R985 OIL

[/quote]

The big question would be how much of the parts went back into each engine? I'm guessing that the nasty ones only needed gaskets. While the clean ones need all new moving parts.[/quote]


No... one of oil's biggest and most important functions is carrying away debris and grit. The really nasty ones usually had LOTS of wear on the wear parts as the debris and grit were kept recirculating. The clean ones were pretty much standard replacement parts at overhaul. Not always...but generally.
John
hardtailjohn offline
User avatar
Posts: 924
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:06 pm
Location: Marion, Montana
God put me here to accomplish a certain amount of things...right now I'm so far behind, I'll never die!!

DISPLAY OPTIONS

9 postsPage 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base