Backcountry Pilot • Pacer vs 108 vs C-170 vs Maule

Pacer vs 108 vs C-170 vs Maule

Technical and practical discussion about specific aircraft types such as Cessna 180, Maule M7, et al. Please read and search carefully before posting, as many popular topics have already been discussed.
9 postsPage 1 of 1

Pacer vs 108 vs C-170 vs Maule

All four have proven themselves as great types, with the Pacer and the Maule giving a sportier image.

Have flown the C-170, the others are on my to do list, but on retro appeal I am fond of the 108 in its -1 or -2 variant, ideally with a Lycoming -360.

Entry price the Pacer and 108 seem better value.
L18C-95 offline
User avatar
Posts: 156
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 5:44 am
Location: Oxford
Aircraft: Piper L18C-95

Re: Pacer vs 108 vs C-170 vs Maule

I think lots of us have considered these options, especially the 170/Stinson/Pacer since they are really the only choices for a certified budget tailwheel backcountry plane. Pacer and the Stinson both have a back seat that is easy to remove. If you get a O-320 in the Pacer that will be easy to support going forward. PA-22/20s can have the baggage door. After you remove the rear seat the rear door in a Pacer is like a big cargo door. To me, Stinsons look the best. Hard choice.
scottf offline
User avatar
Posts: 650
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:56 am
Location: Meridian, ID
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... cbQCpIqefS

Re: Pacer vs 108 vs C-170 vs Maule

...also rather quaintly, the Stinson 108 is approved in the AFM for some limited aeros, specifically loops and barrel roll, in the utility category.
L18C-95 offline
User avatar
Posts: 156
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 5:44 am
Location: Oxford
Aircraft: Piper L18C-95

Re: Pacer vs 108 vs C-170 vs Maule

I can't speak to the 108 or Maule, but for me it's Pacer over 170 hands down. I sooooo wanted a 170 but the math didn't add up so I "settled" for a 150 HP Pacer. I won't look back. Best bang for the buck for sure.
northernguy offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:09 pm
Location: Anahim Lake & Prince George

Re: Pacer vs 108 vs C-170 vs Maule

Love my 108, although mine is a big tail. Great useful, just over 1100. Built like a tank.
soaringhiggy offline
User avatar
Posts: 711
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: Kimberly, ID
48 Stinson 108-3

Re: Pacer vs 108 vs C-170 vs Maule

This should be good...

Image


I vote Maule - might as well have some value for your money :twisted: :mrgreen:
Battson offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 1810
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:19 pm
Location: New Zealand
Aircraft: Bearhawk 4-place
IO-540 260hp

Re: Pacer vs 108 vs C-170 vs Maule

I wanted a Maule M7 or a Cessna 180.

Couldn't afford to feed either one let alone buy one.

My Pacer seemed to be the best value all the way around. Not a super performing in the backcountry, but it is reasonable for my piloting skills. A guy like Highroad can really make a Pacer perform.
gptc offline
User avatar
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:52 am
Location: Grants Pass

Re: Pacer vs 108 vs C-170 vs Maule

gptc wrote:I wanted a Maule M7 or a Cessna 180.

Couldn't afford to feed either one let alone buy one.

My Pacer seemed to be the best value all the way around. Not a super performing in the backcountry, but it is reasonable for my piloting skills. A guy like Highroad can really make a Pacer perform.


I think you got a great deal on that Pacer, Sean. With the O-360 I bet its a great flying airplane. I remember seeing it come up for sale, if it was out there when I was looking I would have tried to buy it.
robw56 offline
User avatar
Posts: 3263
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:30 pm
Location: Ward
Aircraft: 1957 C-180A

Re: Pacer vs 108 vs C-170 vs Maule

Gents,

I have a straight 108 with a lightly modded 0-360. It is a great performer and compares very well. Makes a awesome floatplane with a useful load of 754 on floats and 880 on wheels. Just added 8.5 mains which make it look just right. With one person it flys like a super cub. I am adding the auxiliary fuel tank so it will carry 53 gallons for long trips. Looking to add the baggage compartment as well in the future.

All great planes!
Jimbo2601 offline
User avatar
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 8:25 pm
Location: Illinois

DISPLAY OPTIONS

9 postsPage 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base