Backcountry Pilot • Pearson Field VUO Temp control tower

Pearson Field VUO Temp control tower

Discuss your knowledge of airports and off-airport strips. Help inform other pilots of status, warnings, noise abatement, and closure endangerment. See also: http://www.shortfield.com
4 postsPage 1 of 1

Pearson Field VUO Temp control tower

http://www.columbian.com/news/2011/feb/13/pearson-soaring-into-the-future/

Heads up to other PDX area guys, temporary control tower going up at Pearson in April due to construction at PDX. Some interesting comments on the article.
fern_hopper offline
User avatar
Posts: 503
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 4:42 pm
Location: Wahkiakum County

Re: Pearson Field VUO Temp control tower

Sad commentary from the commentary. :| #-o
Zzz offline
Janitorial Staff
User avatar
Posts: 2854
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: northern
Aircraft: Swiveling desk chair
Half a century spent proving “it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

Re: Pearson Field VUO Temp control tower

I have to agree with many of the comments. I resent tax dollars going to places that are mostly for recreation for a special few. Same thing with horses. Horse farms get special tax treatment. What a crock. Our government is paying for more horse shit, literally, in more ways than you can imagine. I love flying, but the non flying public really shouldn't be paying for stuff like that. Here in the mid-Willamette Valley there are six public airports withing about a sixty mile circle. No way the public good is really and truly served by so many. Maybe four would be about right. :D

tom
Savannah-Tom offline
User avatar
Posts: 891
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:26 pm
Location: Corvallis, OR

Re: Pearson Field VUO Temp control tower

Savannah-Tom wrote:I have to agree with many of the comments. I resent tax dollars going to places that are mostly for recreation for a special few.


I see the point, but it's tough to agree with something that conflicts with my protectionist mentality about aviation.

Unfortunately, there is little middle ground if an airport is not federally funded and protected. Too often the property is sold, then converted to a use other than aviation, like a shopping mall or housing development.

I don't want to get into a federal vs states argument, but we're already seeing the problems (mostly economic/taxation oriented) associated with states governing aviation and aviation facilities. In the case of aviation, I believe it behooves us to be regulated by the Feds rather than the states.

So if us rich hobbyists and our elite socialist facilities don't receive the funding and support to maintain air traffic safety in the vicinity of a Class C, where does that leave us? Totally inop? If no federally funded control tower, shutting the Pearson down to ensure air safety of commercial pax flights into PDX is the only alternative. The only losers are us, the rich hobbylists. At that end, the fiscally conservative campaign will cement some pretty tragic consequences to our favorite pastime.

Perhaps no airport can stand an all-out assault by urban growth unless it has scheduled air carrier service.

Ouch, might have to send myself to Hot Air.
Zzz offline
Janitorial Staff
User avatar
Posts: 2854
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: northern
Aircraft: Swiveling desk chair
Half a century spent proving “it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

DISPLAY OPTIONS

4 postsPage 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base