Swapping from early 180 to 185 gear.
This subforum is meant to organize Skywagon-related topics.
Sun Jul 05, 2026 10:44 am
I have an early set of gear that has the PPonk kit installed.
One of the gear legs is splayed out and I have some built in bank.
I was thinking of swapping the gear with a set of 185 gear from a few hangers down.
My understanding is the 185 gear will be thicker and will interfere with the beef up kit.
Has anyone done the same swap with the kit already installed? Would I require a whole new kit? Worth waiting around for the same thickness legs?
Thanks!
-
cheerios2 offline
-
Posts:
50
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 10:36 pm
- Location: Atlanta GA
Sun Jul 05, 2026 12:47 pm
I'm not sure about the fitment, but I suspect that 185 gear is going to be REALLY stiff for an early 180......
Call the Landing Gear Works, or look up Cessna specs.
-
mtv offline


-
Posts:
10584
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:47 am
- Location: Bozeman
-
Call Jim Hayton at North Sound Aviation- he can validate your gear, heat treat as appropriate- bend back to shape, and yellow tag your current set. 360-661-3302
-
silflexer offline
-
Posts:
92
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 6:13 pm
- Location: Denver
Ditto what MTV & Silflexer said.
My 1953 C180 has 185 gear & I think it's too much of a good thing.
I think the -3 & -4 legs off a 1955-56 180 would be a better match for the weight of my airplane.
-
hotrod180 offline


-
Posts:
10603
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
- Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!
Mon Jul 06, 2026 12:24 pm
I too have a '53 with 185 legs.
I do not agree with those that say that is the best setup. 185 gear legs are for a plane with a gross weight of ?3150? On a plane with a gross of 2550 it makes no sense to me, the stiffness tranfers the shock to the airframe.
The only positive that I see is less in flight gear leg wobble with tundra tires.
-
StillLearning offline

-
Posts:
464
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2018 6:22 pm
- Location: Salmon
- Aircraft: Cessna 180 Skywagon 1953
-
StillLearning wrote:I too have a '53 with 185 legs.
I do not agree with those that say that is the best setup. 185 gear legs are for a plane with a gross weight of ?3150? On a plane with a gross of 2550 it makes no sense to me, the stiffness tranfers the shock to the airframe.
The only positive that I see is less in flight gear leg wobble with tundra tires.
185 went out at 3350 all up.
-
mtv offline


-
Posts:
10584
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:47 am
- Location: Bozeman
-
Re the fit of the pponk beef-up kit:
Perhaps the notch in the pponk casting could be milled out if required for thicker/wider gear legs.
See pic.

-
hotrod180 offline


-
Posts:
10603
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
- Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!
I had a 56 and the gear splayed out when loaded heavy, I found a pair of 185 gear .75 thick worked great (just took a bit more finess landing). I just bought a 55 and it;s .70 thick lets trade

-
Glidergeek offline


-
Posts:
1944
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:02 pm
- Location: Hesperia
- Aircraft: 1968 P206C
DG 400
-
-
Zzz offline

-
Posts:
2991
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: Nowhere
- Aircraft: None
-
DISPLAY OPTIONS
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests