Backcountry Pilot • Alaska VFR minimums

Alaska VFR minimums

Share tips, techniques, or anything else related to flying.
25 postsPage 2 of 21, 2

Re: Flying Wild Alaska

GumpAir wrote:Under Part 135.205. The real-life translation is 1000 ft/1 mile, 500 ft/2 mile to DEPART on a Special VFR or flying in uncontrolled airspace.

Sec. 135.205 — VFR: Visibility requirements.
(a) No person may operate an airplane under VFR in uncontrolled airspace when the ceiling is less than 1,000 feet unless flight visibility is at least 2 miles.

(b) No person may operate a helicopter under VFR in Class G airspace at an altitude of 1,200 feet or less above the surface or within the lateral boundaries of the surface areas of Class B, Class C, Class D, or Class E airspace designated for an airport unless the visibility is at least—

(1) During the day—1/2mile; or

(2) At night—1 mile.

Coming home is a whole other story, at least it was in the old days, and all that is required is "one mile" on the visibility. Ceiling didn't matter. 100 and one got you home, and if you were iced up and running out of options fast, FSS always found "one mile" just long enough to get you back in. Then things snapped shut once you had landed.

And if anybody goes up there to fly for a living and thinks VFR means VFR, boy do they have a surprise coming!!!!!

Gump

Regarding part 135 and special VFR:
Can't find it in the regs regarding 500 and two or 1000 and one
In fact, 91.157 states special VFR is only if the flight is conducted part 91?
Anyone able to shed insight on how they get it done legally? Part 135 specifically
Thanks
Matt
Matt 7GCBC offline
User avatar
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 11:12 pm
Location: Northwest
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... vXLMMuZOv7

Re: Alaska VFR minimums

Part 91 applies to almost everything, see 91.1 (applicability).

In addition, part 135 applies to many commercial operators, see 135.1 (applicability).

In general, part 135 adds restrictions or requirements to part 91. Both must be complied with. But a part 135 operator cannot comply with part 91 in a manner that violates part 135.
Troy Hamon offline
User avatar
Posts: 913
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:27 am
Location: King Salmon
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... 04iX0FXjV2
Aircraft: Piper PA-22

Re: Flying Wild Alaska

Matt 7GCBC wrote:Regarding part 135 and special VFR:
Can't find it in the regs regarding 500 and two or 1000 and one
In fact, 91.157 states special VFR is only if the flight is conducted part 91?
Anyone able to shed insight on how they get it done legally? Part 135 specifically
Thanks
Matt

Part 91 is if ground visibility is less than 1 mile but flight visibility is a mile.
If ground visibility is a mile then 135 is good to go! :D
TangoFox offline
User avatar
Posts: 621
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 7:06 am
Location: Where the wind takes me
Keep the Greasy side down!

Re: Alaska VFR minimums

Regarding part 135 and special VFR:
Can't find it in the regs regarding 500 and two or 1000 and one


It's right there in the few lines of 135.205.

Special VFR lets you fly in controlled airspace at uncontrolled airspace visibility minimums.

1000 ft ceiling, you need only one mile vis (that sucks pond water), or below 1000 foot ceiling, and Part 135 you're not gonna legally fly below 500 ft AGL, it's a 2 mile requirement on the vis (much better than one mile, or less :roll: ).

Gump
GumpAir offline
User avatar
Posts: 4557
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:14 am
Location: Lost somewhere in Nevada
Aircraft: Old Clunker

Re: Alaska VFR minimums

Alaskan's get a jump start on being old farts.... even when young.
Just ask Gump.
We used to "gather round" in the fog... and have one elected guy ask for the special. Then we all quietly followed him in.
FSS knew what was going on. The deal is... noboby drives. So, if you are not willing to figure out a way to get places...for other pilots, then on the days you have places to go... in ain't gonna work very well for you. Unless you had a cumfy boat to get around on....
flightlogic offline
User avatar
Posts: 616
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 2:51 pm
Location: Prescott
Flying is dangerous. If you think otherwise, you are new at this sport. Mind the gravity not the gap.

DISPLAY OPTIONS

Previous
25 postsPage 2 of 21, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base