Backcountry Pilot • Metalized vs Fabric Pacer

Metalized vs Fabric Pacer

Technical and practical discussion about specific aircraft types such as Cessna 180, Maule M7, et al. Please read and search carefully before posting, as many popular topics have already been discussed.
41 postsPage 3 of 31, 2, 3

Re: Metalized vs Fabric Pacer

mtv wrote:
hotrod180 wrote:
mtv wrote: The basic construcion of a wing that’s designed from the git go to be an all metal wing, such as a Cessna wing, is often quite different than a wing that was originally designed as a fabric wing, then metalized, such as the Maule wing.....


I'm not so sure I go along with the second part of that statement.
A lot of people assume that the Maule wing was originally designed to be fabric covered,
mainly because they're fitted with two wing struts.
But I believe all the production Maules starting with the M4 (way back around 1964) had metal covered wings.
My own thought is that maybe the reason two struts were part of the design was to simplify rigging.
Anyone who's ever rebuilt a set of Cessna wings (esp without a jig to guarantee the washout is correct) might agree.


Look at an early Maule. Now look at a Piper Pacer. More specifically, look at the respective wings, as in their construction.....other than cover.

MTV

Helio started with a piper clipper.
IMG_0369.JPG
IMG_0369.JPG (45.26 KiB) Viewed 390 times

IMG_0368.JPG
IMG_0368.JPG (32.23 KiB) Viewed 390 times

IMG_0370.JPG
IMG_0370.JPG (403.82 KiB) Viewed 390 times

I was told maule started with a pacer
Tom offline
Posts: 791
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 12:17 pm
Location: Loudon NH
Aircraft: PA-18 7EC C-172

DISPLAY OPTIONS

Previous
41 postsPage 3 of 31, 2, 3

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base