low rider wrote:Did that silver plane get landed like that or did it end up in the water !?
Rob wrote:There seems to be a misconception that utilizing energy management techniques somehow means you are flying faster, so you have speed to trade off.
I don't know Jim's techniques, training program, or flying philosophies, so I'm not speaking for him, but in my mind, energy management is something a person should be practicing clear to a stop, and not necessarily in a single directional plane. DENNY, energy management exists in your low and slow world, make friends with it. A spray plane loaded to 10,000#++ with a measly 600 hp on the nose is going to be going fast compared to you, but has an order of magnitude less maneuverability, and margin of error, and thus learns to live with energy management.
We are not flying jets on victor airways or assigned altitudes and headings, nor flying fighter jets. Everything you need to know about how and where your airplane is going can be determined by your butt, ears, eyes, and nose, and all of it should be directed by you, irregardless of wind direction or speed. If you really need a dial or LED to tell you something about where and how your next landing is going to be, than you simply need more 'quality' dual and / or hours in the seat.
Rivers are fun, wires are bad. Wires that cross rivers are mostly steel (worse than the ones ag planes tend to hit). I don't like hitting wires in an agplane, I'd not want to subject myself to that possibility in a GA airplane. Even when I am flying a river I have run before, I scour the banks. No wire was born on a river, it got hung there. Did someone just string up a new gauge or zip line? I dunno, but they don't often cross without a starting point like a tower on the bank. No guarantee, but much easier to spot than a single cable. I still fly on the rivers most of the time, not much higher than I'd care to fall out of it, but looking for wires is part of my day job, and even as such I've managed to 'find' a few.
Take care, Rob
NineThreeKilo wrote:
Victor airways are pretty low for a jet
But agree with everything you said

contactflying wrote:Was the prop still turning and did it cut one wire?
mtv wrote:contactflying wrote:The heart of energy management is not about teasing the edge, it is about avoiding it with intelligent technique rather than with rules. Once in too deep, rules no longer protect. Good energy management can provide the extra above the edge that keeps us alive. We can rule that pilots do not turn level at steep enough bank that they stall. When it is either turn or CFIT because engine energy is all used up, intelligent technique which has been out there for years is all that will do. Many of us have described it in various languages, terms, an phrases but pilots continue to kill themselves as taught and ruled at the same rate.
Jim,
The accident above had NOTHING to do with energy management. They never saw the wires.
MTV
JP256 wrote:mtv wrote:contactflying wrote:The heart of energy management is not about teasing the edge, it is about avoiding it with intelligent technique rather than with rules. Once in too deep, rules no longer protect. Good energy management can provide the extra above the edge that keeps us alive. We can rule that pilots do not turn level at steep enough bank that they stall. When it is either turn or CFIT because engine energy is all used up, intelligent technique which has been out there for years is all that will do. Many of us have described it in various languages, terms, an phrases but pilots continue to kill themselves as taught and ruled at the same rate.
Jim,
The accident above had NOTHING to do with energy management. They never saw the wires.
MTV
In fairness to Jim, I don't see anything in his post that implies that energy management would have somehow prevented that wire strike...
My experience flying helicopters NOE was that wires could be incredibly difficult to see. And that was when I was young, and still had 20/10 vision. (I'm at 20/20 with corrective lenses nowadays, yet still feel "blind" sometimes by comparison to my younger days.)
I'm not saying "don't do it." because I agree it can be incredibly fun and exhilarating. But please be careful. A good high-recon, followed by a mid-level recon – in both directions, by the way – is my minimum "insurance policy" before I would "fly the river" – any river... And remember, new wires can spring up literally overnight... I've had that experience right in the middle of a military reservation where everyone knew damn good and well that the entire area was used for low-level and NOE flight training. We even had written (signed) agreements with PG&E that they would NOT put up new electrical lines without notice. They just didn't care – they had a right-of-way, and those wires were going up, consequences be damned. Far too much trouble to notify the Army.
mtv wrote:I never intended ANY criticism of or connection between “energy management” and wire strikes. My point was, if you’re flying that low, over water courses, the risk isn’t hitting dirt….it’s hitting wires.
It’s easy to suggest that one should/does always do a high recon, but frankly, for most that’s just a theory, not a practice. I’ve spent a lot of flight time down low. Fortunately for me, the vast majority of that time has been where there are no human structures.
Fly low if you will, but there are a LOT of wires in most of the country.
MTV
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests