Backcountry Pilot • What''s your take on this technique?

What''s your take on this technique?

Share tips, techniques, or anything else related to flying.
84 postsPage 2 of 51, 2, 3, 4, 5

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

obxbushpilot wrote: I was taught to use the flap handle technique and now that I have a taildragger with electric flaps...........


What kind of taildragger is that? Most of the ones I can think of are all johnson bar, except the Swift. Factory built anyways, I guess a lot of homebuilts have electric flaps & trim.
hotrod180 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 10534
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

gbflyer wrote:This should be a good one!

GB


X2 Image
mountainmatt offline
User avatar
Posts: 2803
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 2:43 pm
Location: Colorful Colorado
FlyingPoochProductions
FlyColorado.org

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

What happened to ?

aktahoe1 wrote:I guess we need to agree to disagree....


:lol:
WSH offline
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 3:09 pm
Location: Virginia Beach

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

Food for thought and a slightly different view on the subject.

http://www.avweb.com/news/pelican/182089-1.html


And often requires a slightly more advanced technique than the "Private Pilot Syllabus" teaches. :shock:
Last edited by WSH on Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
WSH offline
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 3:09 pm
Location: Virginia Beach

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

I just disagreed is all...its all good. This is one of those topics that can go on forever. Sort of like 3 point landings vs wheel landings.

http://www.aero.com/publications/norcal/art1.htm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAt6aMPG ... re=related
aktahoe1 offline
User avatar
Posts: 2052
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:22 am
Location: Alaska and Lake Tahoe = aktahoe
If it looks smooth, it might be. If it looks rough, it is...www.bigtirepilot.com ...www.alaskaheliski.com

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

Here's the opinion from someone who actually instructs, makes a living, teaching in the in "Backcountry".

http://www.canyonflying.com/takeoffs.html
WSH offline
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 3:09 pm
Location: Virginia Beach

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

Aren't these forums great! I Love it! :D You guys are a wealth of information. Being a newbie here (and a pilot since '74) I trust I can share a bit of information and experience in addition to learning a lot from all of you. As pilots, we never stop learning...and that's a GOOD thing.

From all the posts to my original one, it's apparent that there's more than one way to skin a cat.

Clear skies...
Doug
MTPilot offline
User avatar
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 4:24 pm
Location: Red Lodge, MT

Re: What''s your take on this technique?



Experience is where you find it...

The one thing those guys have in common (that our original posters video did not BTW), is that they are all extremely light, over powered, and at sea level, on a cool day

Kevin, Big screen it, almost every Cessna in the heavy touring set minimal flaps and then dropped on the roll :wink: < I will bet the farm that if the cessna flap handle was easier to reach they wouldn't even bother setting the little bit they had..Bush class? I can't think of anyone who sets flaps prior? oh and BTW next time your at Valdez, ask Paul Klaus if (he's very personable) if he treats the stol competition like he treats a flight with a load and paying customer...

As a neophyte, I will not bang my chest on hours, time in type, or skill... I simply base my opinion on the experience of the folks I fly with. Most are in the 29K hr. - 30k hr. range of ag time. I can think of no other flying profession that requires more landing / take off cycles, at gross or well beyond, than them, can you?



aktahoe1 wrote:
Not to mention from the Syllabus that you should have followed when getting your private certificate:


The good news here, is that after I earned that 'license to learn', following these basic guide lines to staying alive... I went on to keep learning. The best part is that I continue to do so! :wink:

Now I am off to work... tonight I will set full flaps for every other take off. I only have about 20 loads, but all are near or at the same weight... Maybe I will be in for a surprise? :^o
Rob offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 1569
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:34 am

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

Like someone once said...it you want to find it on the internet you can.

I like my brakes while bringing the power up. I have protection on the horizontal stab for that very reason. Not to mention I like getting the engine up to speed prior to the roll and the tail off the ground.

Now, if I am in a rocky area or loose debris, I would probably roll to run up speed to lesson the impact of flying debris, but by the most part, tail is up, engine is up, brakes are pressed and then I'm rolling. I comes down to the situation at hand.

Just like, some landings are meant to be 3 point and others are meant to wheel it.

Back to the original post...I still think the technique is not correct for the tike. Its not paved. I have always thought grass to be soft and decreasing your ground roll by at least 10%. The nose wheel should have been up. You cannot tell me that the puddle in the video does not make it soft (not to mention it looks like there is a pot hole there) Its not pavement. Grass grows on dirt. Water makes wet grass and dirt soft.

Keep bringing it. I get my plane back tomorrow so I am here....at least thinking about flying....
aktahoe1 offline
User avatar
Posts: 2052
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:22 am
Location: Alaska and Lake Tahoe = aktahoe
If it looks smooth, it might be. If it looks rough, it is...www.bigtirepilot.com ...www.alaskaheliski.com

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

Rob-

Those guys all have 20 degrees of flaps. Even the guy in the bird dog looking plane (Yes I know its not a bird dog) The red 185- N70253, I believe is Wrangel mtn air (could be wrong). He was the winner of the class. Klaus flies into Cordova weekly. I cannot get enough info from him. Actually see him often given my winter location.

I do agree with the license to learn...thats the best part of flying. Will stick with my last post. No sense beating a horse. Too many options and variables.
aktahoe1 offline
User avatar
Posts: 2052
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:22 am
Location: Alaska and Lake Tahoe = aktahoe
If it looks smooth, it might be. If it looks rough, it is...www.bigtirepilot.com ...www.alaskaheliski.com

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

aktahoe1 wrote:Rob-

Those guys all have 20 degrees of flaps. Even the guy in the bird dog looking plane (Yes I know its not a bird dog) The red 185- N70253, I believe is Wrangel mtn air (could be wrong). He was the winner of the class. Klaus flies into Cordova weekly. I cannot get enough info from him. Actually see him often given my winter location.

I do agree with the license to learn...thats the best part of flying. Will stick with my last post. No sense beating a horse. Too many options and variables.


Kevin, all in good fun... I don't think the red wagon is Kellys, I think Don Welte was flying Kellys plane... 8209U...
Flaps 20 on a Cessna to start... yes, otherwise you just can't reach them :wink:

3pt vs wheelie... flaps set or not... the only reason these conversations go on is because some folks refuse to believe flying is not a one size fits all :wink:

Now i really better get a move on #-o
Rob offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 1569
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:34 am

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

Shit!, don't quit yet....nobody has thrown in the "J" turn yet.....or if it works better turning left or right :mrgreen:.
Terry offline
User avatar
Posts: 1365
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 9:11 pm
Location: Willamette Valley
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... 4GzPHI6t1d

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

Rob wrote: oh and BTW next time your at Valdez, ask Paul Klaus if (he's very personable) ...

Rob

Almost died laughing with that one -- what a set up.

BTW, both Don W. and Kelly with WMA fly in and out of my airstrip regularly and never have I seen either one, or any other pilot with WMA, for that matter, step on their breaks and run up their engines to full power as a prelude to ground roll for takeoff. They may do it under certain situations, but then there is no right way all the time...
Nizina offline
User avatar
Posts: 499
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 9:40 pm
Location: Wrangell Mountains
Nizina
Image

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

This is one of the reasons I fly a Piper and not a Cessna whatever ... I just hate that slooooooooow Cessna electric trim ... and love my Piper johnson bar flaps.

Everybody's got their own recipe for flyin' their bird, but here's what I was taught, and works fine for me:

On a soft field I don't run up the power to full throttle with brakes locked - I don't want to pull up more stones and crap through my prop from the surface than necessary - a real concern on a typical backcountry airstrip; instead, just smoothly apply power like any takeoff.

And "testing" your engine's power is done during runup, at far lower RPM than full takeoff power. If you can't trust your engine after a normal runup, then your bird doesn't belong in the backcountry - it belongs in the shop. In my humble opinion.

Before starting the takeoff roll, start out with one notch of flaps (10 deg in a Cherokee), and for gosh sake don't pull the yolk back all the way to your lap and suffer all that extra drag .. the point is to get the aircraft speed up to rotation airspeed ASAP while on the ground ... besides, if you're worried about the nosegear, I just remember that the Cherokee nosegear is just as stout as its main gear, and is not a "training wheel" like the C-birds are stuck with (another reason I strongly prefer Pipers). So let the nosegear take whatever the runway dishes out, and the idea is to accelerate to flying speed at max rate (meaning neutral yolk, or only slightly back) ... then about 5 mph below rotation speed, "pop" the second notch of flaps (25 deg) and she's airborne, just like that!

And then don't forget to drop the flaps after accelerating out of ground effect - one notch at a time - as soon as a positive ROC is established at Vy or greater. Otherwise the climb rate sucks.

I'm with the others here who don't practice "yolk back in your lap" soft field takeoffs ... that seems a surefire way to dissipate way too much of the energy produced by the engine. Once you've got some airspeed built up, then you're in business!

Duane
nmflyguy offline
User avatar
Posts: 278
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:03 am
"Sometimes the magic works, and sometimes it doesn't"

Chief Dan George, in "Little Big Man"

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

mountainmatt wrote:
gbflyer wrote:This should be a good one!

GB


X2 Image


X3 Image
58Skylane offline
User avatar
Posts: 5297
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: Cody Wyoming

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

Image

Image

Image

And when all said and done..........Image


Image
58Skylane offline
User avatar
Posts: 5297
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: Cody Wyoming

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

I cant stop laughing at that 58! Nice one....

I am still holding my brakes depending on conditions of the field and how tall the trees are at the end.

\:D/
aktahoe1 offline
User avatar
Posts: 2052
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:22 am
Location: Alaska and Lake Tahoe = aktahoe
If it looks smooth, it might be. If it looks rough, it is...www.bigtirepilot.com ...www.alaskaheliski.com

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

Most of the time we are on unpaved strips we use a combination of short and soft field techniques.


The yoke should be back any time you are on any runway not paved.
The propeller will be a few inches further away from the dirt and rocks.
Also the nose gear on a 182 is kind of wimpy. the less pressure on it the better.

That nose gear on the original video took a pounding.

Dropping the flaps on the roll is good if the runway is not soft.
It will save you some drag from the start of the takeoff roll until you reach flying speed, especially when heavy.

If the runway is soft then put flaps in from the start.
TangoFox offline
User avatar
Posts: 621
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 7:06 am
Location: Where the wind takes me
Keep the Greasy side down!

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

Man, i gotta try that lock the brakes and gas it deal....! my brakes won't hold it at full blast, thank goodness...

i prefer to be rolling when entering any runway, especially soft, ramp it up slow,20 on the flaps, and keep the nose light...

put the nose down as soon as she lifts off, and hold it, keep the MP at a heat/power building 29", and then there is no

holding the climb back...flaps bk to 10 and you're gone!
jomac offline
User avatar
Posts: 720
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:25 pm
Location: idaho falls, id
jomac

Re: What''s your take on this technique?

This Video 182 is a "road hog" ---- need to get some action . I fly into and out of 1200 ft. strip at ranch and use 1/4 -1/3 length . Read and comprehend "Mt. Flying Bible" - Get Manual -Johnson Bar flaps with EZFLAP handle ,Lift reserve indicator ,SPORTSMAN STOL KIT . Keep weight centered on CG -lighter wing loading will help .
182 STOL driver offline
Posts: 1529
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:27 pm

DISPLAY OPTIONS

PreviousNext
84 postsPage 2 of 51, 2, 3, 4, 5

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base