M5guy wrote:Having viewed the Stewart Systems videos, if/when I do this again I think I 'd strongly consider the Stewart System.
If you're working in your garage, the Stewart system won't gas out the rest of the home occupants. It's really not at all unpleasant to work with.
The color-coat is a two-part catalyzed system, but due to some aspect of its design, forced air breathing isn't required, just a good carbon-canister mask. Initially, I was a little concerned about following that advice, afraid the Stewart's might just be a couple country hicks with no science behind them--but when you talk with them you find, a) they really do seem to have this stuff figured out, and b) they're about as nice of folks as you could imagine.
I recovered my Tri-Pacer wings this year. (Actually farmed out the main wing, but covered the flaps and ailerons myself for the experience.) I've worked with Randolph a little in the past. As a novice, I thought the Stewart process was dramatically easier to work with.
The other points in this thread have had good advice--you could probably do it yourself, but if you have someone that has done it before at your shoulder, it helps. If you do go the Stewart process, some of their non-Stewart experience will not carry over, but how to orient tapes and stitch spacing, how to tie the knots, etc, will. The Stewarts also include a DVD set plus CD of the manual with the kit. And that tip about having a needle per rib if you're working alone was worth the price of admission by itself. You can order the DVD/CDs separately, too, if you want to see what you're getting into.
Two other pluses for Stewart are no haz-mat fees for shipping, it comes regular UPS, and in a conversation with Dan (I think) at the factory, I remarked that left to themselves, my shop would have used Superflite. He said for an all-fabric plane, like a Super Cub, the Stewart process will be about 40 pounds lighter than (Superflite.)
Benton 8dec08