×

Error

You need to login in order to reply to topics within this forum.

Backcountry Pilot • Your own VOR tester

Your own VOR tester

Avionics, airplane covers, tires, handheld radios, GPS receivers, wireless Wx uplink...any product related to backcountry aircraft and flying.
14 postsPage 1 of 1

Your own VOR tester

Saw this in the interwebs, cool tech.

Here's a trivially easy way to create your own VOR Test transmitter.

What you need:
A Raspberry Pi (any model will do, including the $5 Pi Zero)
A laptop, or cellphone (I presume you already have this)
A piece of wire, about 18" long, length not critical
A 3.5mm jack plug

On the Pi, download and install rpitx: https://github.com/F5OEO/rpitx
If you're using a model A pi, or a pi zero you may need to engage this hack:
https://github.com/F5OEO/rpitx/issues/5
EDIT: for clarity - this is not my software.

rpitx turns the pi into a somewhat versatile SDR transmitter. We'll use it to generate a steady 108.00MHz carrier. Terrible harmonics in the output, but it's free, so don't complain.

Download the attached audio file:
Attachment:
http://www.avcanada.ca/forums2/download ... p?id=11302
Downloaded 12 times


That file is 10 seconds of the synthesized baseband signal of what a VOR transmits on the 0 degree radial. (Only 10 seconds because this brain-dead forum software won't take a file larger than 1 MByte. So when it comes time to play back the file, loop it, ok?). There's also an on-off-on-off 1020hz ident tone, so you can tell you're tuned to the right frequency.

Execute the following command on the pi:
sudo ./rpitx -m VFO -f 108000

That gives you a 108.00MHz carrier from pin 12 (http://pi4j.com/pins/model-a-plus.html). All we need to do now is modulate the audio onto the carrier and fire it into a bit of wire.

As it turns out the easiest way to get some modulation going is to connect pin 12 on the pi to the tip (or ring) of the headphone output of your (my) laptop or iPhone, and wind up the volume. Any kind of non-linear mixing will cause modulation, and as good luck will have it, at about 3/4 full volume there's enough non-linear stuff going on either in the pi or the audio output stage of the laptop to get a decent depth of modulation. I used a wire about 18 inches long to connect the two, which also acts as the transmission antenna.

Since I was powering the pi from a USB port on the laptop, I didn't need to connect the sleeve (GND) of the headphone output as well. If the pi is running from another power source, you should probably connect the GND of the headphone output to a GND pin on the pi. There are lots to choose from.

Caveat: yes, you're firing a 108MHz 5v square wave up the jacksie of your laptop. Doesn't seem to have troubled mine very much, nor my iPhone. But this is at your own risk.

Stretch the wire out straight, and play the audio. That's it.

Turn on and tune in the VOR receiver to 108.0 MHz. The needle should centre with a 'from' flag on the 0 radial, and a 'to' flag on the 180 radial. (One Eight Two = one eight, to, remember?)

This morning I had four aircraft in the hangar all happily tuned in and confirming to me that their VOR resolvers were nicely lined up, with the setup as described. Plenty of range. Clear audio idents. I have synthesized files for the 45 and 90 degree radials too, and any others you want. Adjust the volume on the laptop or iPhone to get decent modulation and a clear ident, as necessary. (If you want the python code to generate the baseband signals yourself, let me know and I'll post it.)

This general idea also works well for checking the localizer receiver, and should work on the glideslope as well, with appropriate audio files and an appropriate carrier frequency. I can explain how to get the audio files right, in another post, if anyone's interested.

The obvious thing to do next is to get rid of the laptop and find another way to do the audio and modulation. Unfortunately, the AM mode on rpitx isn't clean enough by itself. I'll work on this next.

Finally: do NOT go all Colonel Stuart (Die Hard 2) on me and use this setup to interfere with a real VOR, localizer or glideslope frequency in use at an airport. That would not be even slightly funny. Even so, this is all probably illegal - don't tell Industry Canada you're transmitting (even low power) in the aviation bands from an unlicensed transmitter. Naughty naughty.


http://www.avcanada.ca/forums2/viewtopi ... 7&t=107650
NineThreeKilo offline
Retired
Posts: 1679
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:16 pm
Location: _

Re: Your own VOT tester

Awe. Some.

I'll give this a whirl.
lesuther offline
Posts: 1429
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:26 pm
Location: CO

Re: Your own VOT tester

Cool if you like tinkering, but I have an easier way to check your VOR. Look in the AFD, it lists the nearest VOR for each airport and the radial/DME. Fly overhead that airport, tune in that VOR and dial in that radial, and see if it centers. Or punch a nearby VOR into your GPS as a destination and see if the bearing to matches what your VOR head indicates.
hotrod180 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 10534
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!

Re: Your own VOT tester

Sounds like good tinkering fun that I would never deny to the geeks that are interested. Unfortunately, for me it falls into the same bucket as the old LF/MF Four-Course Radio Range. None of my planes have a VOR receiver any longer, and I've removed the rabbit ears antenna, for good, never going back. I last flew a VOR on an IFR approach in 2003, in Iran. For enroute that would have probably have been around 1988.

Curious if anyone on this forum actually ever navigates using a VOR and why.
Karmutzen offline
User avatar
Posts: 711
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:47 pm
Location: Great Bear Rainforest
'74 7GCBC, 26" ABW, Aera 660 feeding G5 and FC-10 FF.

Re: Your own VOT tester

Karmutzen wrote:
Curious if anyone on this forum actually ever navigates using a VOR and why.


The VOR on my airplane is about 20 degrees off so not particularly useful for navigation. I do however use it fairly regularly to keep count of landings while practicing t&g's.

Pretty fascinating anyway what you can do with this really inexpensive hardware/software these days. The DIY ADS-b setup is frickin cool.
Crenshaw offline
User avatar
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:09 am
Location: Arkansas Valley, CO

Re: Your own VOT tester

Karmutzen wrote:Sounds like good tinkering fun that I would never deny to the geeks that are interested. Unfortunately, for me it falls into the same bucket as the old LF/MF Four-Course Radio Range. None of my planes have a VOR receiver any longer, and I've removed the rabbit ears antenna, for good, never going back. I last flew a VOR on an IFR approach in 2003, in Iran. For enroute that would have probably have been around 1988.

Curious if anyone on this forum actually ever navigates using a VOR and why.



I still have my VOR, I'll fly a ILS, heck they are the top pick and first advertised on the ATIS at larger fields, I also like keeping my VOR because I like to have more then just /G capabilities, GPS outages happen, outside of my plane, ar work we don't have a single IFR platform which only relies on GPS. It's like a flathead screw driver, I don't use flathead screws, I still keep my flathead in my tool box, it's not like outdated and decommissioned or soon to be decommmisioned equipment, VORs ain't going anywhere and it ain't that much for my GNS to also run a VOR.
NineThreeKilo offline
Retired
Posts: 1679
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:16 pm
Location: _

Re: Your own VOT tester

Karmutzen wrote:Sounds like good tinkering fun that I would never deny to the geeks that are interested. Unfortunately, for me it falls into the same bucket as the old LF/MF Four-Course Radio Range. None of my planes have a VOR receiver any longer, and I've removed the rabbit ears antenna, for good, never going back. I last flew a VOR on an IFR approach in 2003, in Iran. For enroute that would have probably have been around 1988.

Curious if anyone on this forum actually ever navigates using a VOR and why.


Until I had the 430W installed, all my IFR flying was via airways and VORs, although often VFR flying was by using my handheld 96C. After the 430W was installed, I still tend to fly the airways much of the time when IFR, although I use the GPS side and confirm with the VOR side, and I keep the #2 navcom paralleling the VOR side of the 430W. I also still use the 96C, and of course I have the Foreflight map on my iPad, with either its built-in GPS or the GPS from the Stratus 2. FWIW, I also plug in any NDBs along my route, for yet another backup. It's sort of a pants and suspenders thing (or if you prefer, having multiple backups), because I've experienced the GPS system go down on me, once while IFR and once while VFR, so I don't quite trust it to navigate IFR exclusively. On the occasion of the IFR glitch, it only lasted a short time, probably no more than 10-15 seconds, but long enough to convince me that GPS wasn't reliable enough to be the sole IFR navigation source--"off" flags bother me when I'm in solid! On the VFR glitch, it lasted for however long it takes to go just north of Alamosa where it quit to La Garita, probably 12-15 minutes, when it came up again as I was in the pattern. There may come a time when GPS is reliable enough for exclusive use while IFR, but not yet.

Cary
Cary offline
User avatar
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:49 pm
Location: Fort Collins, CO
"I have slipped the surly bonds of earth..., put out my hand and touched the face of God." J.G. Magee

Re: Your own VOT tester

We use VORs pretty regular in the Blackhawks.

Don't have one in the personal plane, but I wouldn't hesitate to use it if I had it. But if I had GPS I'd just go direct in IFR and nevermind the VOR unless it was needed for an approach.
CamTom12 offline
User avatar
Posts: 3705
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 1:08 pm
Location: Huntsville
FindMeSpot URL: https://share.delorme.com/camtom12
Aircraft: Ruppe Racer
Experimental Pacer
home hand jam "wizard"

Re: Your own VOT tester

lesuther wrote:Awe. Some.

I'll give this a whirl.


Can we test out my VOR? It's not seen a VOT in 13 years.. ;-)

'soy
soyAnarchisto offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 1975
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:23 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Aircraft: 1955 Cessna 180

Re: Your own VOR tester

Does anyone have one that works for sale? I could use it for a classroom demonstration.
thanks!
Outermarker08 offline
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2020 6:07 pm
Location: Batavia
Aircraft: Luscombe 8

Re: Your own VOR tester

Hmm, this is a bit of an uncalled for slag of the forum in my opinion !!!!

"Only 10 seconds because this brain-dead forum software won't take a file larger than 1 MByte"
Mapleflt offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2324
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2017 2:35 pm
Location: Bradford
Aircraft: Cessna S170B NexGen (NM) Variant

Re: Your own VOR tester

Mapleflt wrote:Hmm, this is a bit of an uncalled for slag of the forum in my opinion !!!!

"Only 10 seconds because this brain-dead forum software won't take a file larger than 1 MByte"


Wow! I forgot about this thread lol

That was a quote from a different forum, no insult towards BCP, the best of the aviation forums :)
NineThreeKilo offline
Retired
Posts: 1679
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:16 pm
Location: _

Re: Your own VOR tester

Can you send me your other AudioFiles please. 0° seems to work also with my ICOM A24 108.000 tunded in !
magu81 offline
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2021 3:22 am
Location: Heilbronn
Aircraft: 72' Pa-28 140

Re: Your own VOT tester

NineThreeKilo wrote:....... It's like a flathead screw driver, I don't use flathead screws, I still keep my flathead in my tool box, it's not like outdated and decommissioned or soon to be decommmisioned equipment, VORs ain't going anywhere.......


https://nbaa.org/aircraft-operations/ai ... -308-vors/

"FAA has taken the next step in creating a minimum operational network of ground-based very high frequency, omnidirectional radio range (VOR) navaids, finalizing a policy that includes identifying more than 300 VORs that will be decommissioned as part of industry’s transition to more efficient, satellite-based instrument approach procedures."
hotrod180 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 10534
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!

DISPLAY OPTIONS

14 postsPage 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base