Backcountry Pilot • 178 seconds

178 seconds

Share tips, techniques, or anything else related to flying.
19 postsPage 1 of 1

178 seconds

M6RV6 offline
User avatar
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:52 pm
Location: Rice Wa. 82WN Magee Creek AERODROME
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... sWKXuhKlg2
Have as much Fun as is Safe, and Keep SMILIN! GT,

Re: 178 seconds

A good reminder for all of us.
mountainmatt offline
User avatar
Posts: 2803
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 2:43 pm
Location: Colorful Colorado
FlyingPoochProductions
FlyColorado.org

Re: 178 seconds

Lost a family member a year ago April 6th to that. Must have been an awful last 3 minutes. Hard to believe a skylane can make an 8 foot deep hole when operated by the inner ear.
Nosedragger offline
Posts: 975
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 6:40 am
Location: SE Idaho
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... ACzcbTgqlT

Re: 178 seconds

Nosedragger wrote:Lost a family member a year ago April 6th to that. Must have been an awful last 3 minutes. Hard to believe a skylane can make an 8 foot deep hole when operated by the inner ear.


So Sorry, almost was there myself!! Was what made me get my raring!! Saved by a little luck many years ago, sure was no skill involved!!
M6RV6 offline
User avatar
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:52 pm
Location: Rice Wa. 82WN Magee Creek AERODROME
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... sWKXuhKlg2
Have as much Fun as is Safe, and Keep SMILIN! GT,

Re: 178 seconds

There are those who argue that the study which led to the 178 seconds rule is flawed, but whether it is or isn't, the fact is that flying VFR into IMC by an unqualified pilot is a leading cause of fatal crashes.

Obtaining an IR by itself isn't a "get home free" card, but it goes a long way toward reducing the chances of pranging in weather. Arguing "I don't need that--I only fly in good weather" belies the real possibility that a long flight may encounter not-so-good weather. I think anyone who has flown for very long at all has had exactly that experience, in which the destination's weather was mis-forecast and wasn't nearly as good as expected.

Cary
Cary offline
User avatar
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:49 pm
Location: Fort Collins, CO
"I have slipped the surly bonds of earth..., put out my hand and touched the face of God." J.G. Magee

Re: 178 seconds

In the training you should learn just how quick it is that you can screw up!! I think that is the most valuable lesson learned!
I think a IR pretty much makes a 180 turn an option. At least if you get the rating you should be able to hold an altitude and make a turn with out killing yourself.
again, just my HO
M6RV6 offline
User avatar
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:52 pm
Location: Rice Wa. 82WN Magee Creek AERODROME
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... sWKXuhKlg2
Have as much Fun as is Safe, and Keep SMILIN! GT,

Re: 178 seconds

M6RV6 wrote:At least if you get the rating you should be able to hold an altitude and make a turn with out killing yourself.


You don't need an IR to realize that if you can't see outside, to pay attention inside!
NimpoCub offline
User avatar
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:04 pm
Location: Nimpo Lake, BC 52.22N 125.14W
FindMeSpot URL: www.tinyurl.com/loganspot
Nimpo Lake Logan... boonie SuperCubber

Re: 178 seconds

One of the biggest advantages I see to instrument training, besides not flying the plane upside down, is that it makes you comfortable with atc. I used to dread the whole who, where,what conversations but if I got in the soup now without ifr charts, I'd have no reservations about getting vectors out of something, and I would have been on the horn with flight watch about the weather prior to getting there. Those that got their privates in busy places probably don't have this stigma, but us hillbillies in Idaho were never exposed to much radio work.
Nosedragger offline
Posts: 975
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 6:40 am
Location: SE Idaho
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... ACzcbTgqlT

Re: 178 seconds

Nosedragger wrote:Those that got their privates in busy places probably don't have this stigma, but us hillbillies in Idaho were never exposed to much radio work.


Yeah, I was lucky to train in a pretty busy class D and another pretty busy untowered airport. Both taught the lesson that communication was important and nothing to be nervous about.

The folks who came into the area to get their minimums met were always obvious! :-)
rw2 offline
User avatar
Posts: 1799
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 1:10 pm
Location: San Miguel de Allende
FindMeSpot URL: https://share.delorme.com/LaNaranjaDanzante
Aircraft: Experimental Maule
Follow my Flying, Cooking and Camping adventures at RichWellner.com

Re: 178 seconds

There are those who argue that the study which led to the 178 seconds rule is flawed, but whether it is or isn't, the fact is that flying VFR into IMC by an unqualified pilot is a leading cause of fatal crashes.


Amen.....

Gump
GumpAir offline
User avatar
Posts: 4557
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:14 am
Location: Lost somewhere in Nevada
Aircraft: Old Clunker

Re: 178 seconds

We had a class on this in flight school. I didn't understand it as much at the time but the more actual weather I encounter the more I think back on that class.

The big example for discussion was a fully animated flight from a data recorder in an Apache that went IIMC. The first minute and a half or so was SCARY. They went from 200' AGL or something like that all the way down to 5' AGL (overtorqued the engines/trans at the bottom of that!) and every mostly upright attitude you could think of before they settled into the true transition to instruments. The crew tried to keep flying VFR after punching in and were incredibly lucky to make it out alive.

It was a definitive line where they transitioned to the panel though. Once they accepted that they were IMC and started flying that way it looked like any other normal flight.
CamTom12 offline
User avatar
Posts: 3705
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 1:08 pm
Location: Huntsville
FindMeSpot URL: https://share.delorme.com/camtom12
Aircraft: Ruppe Racer
Experimental Pacer
home hand jam "wizard"

Re: 178 seconds

You don't need an IR to realize that if you can't see outside, to pay attention inside!
But that is exactly what doesn't happen. Instead of gluing to the instruments, VFR pilots encountering IMC invariably continue to try to maintain control by looking outside.

I've described this situation so many times that I might have done so here, too, and if so, forgive the repetitiveness. My first start-to-finish student was a good stick, and he'd already had his 3 hours of required hood time, but no actual. He could navigate well, he did well on unusual attitude recovery, etc. He had voiced more than once that he didn't see what the big deal was, flying on instruments.

He wanted to take his long dual to Jackson, so with his wife in the back seat, we set off on the usual route from Laramie, via Medicine Bow, Riverton, etc. But northwest of Riverton, the route was getting socked in. He asked if we could file IFR, but I explained that there was no way to get a 172 with 3 aboard up to the MEA of 14,000'. He finally turned us around as the vis narrowed down, I took over and told him to plot the route to Casper, and then he flew us there, where we had lunch. While there, I filed IFR back to Laramie, anticipating we'd run into some of what made us turn around earlier.

Soon after crossing Casper Mountain, we were in and out of the clouds. After only a short time, we were a-kilter off to the left. I tapped the AI, and he immediately corrected, but a few minutes later, it happened again. After tapping the AI again and he corrected, I called Center and got a block altitude and advised that we'd likely divert from the centerline of the airway, because this was a training flight. He couldn't hear me, because this was olden times--we weren't using headsets and an intercom.

In only a couple minutes, we were into a diving left turn. This time I let it go while we lost several hundred feet and turned nearly 180 degrees, before tapping him on the shoulder and asking him where we were going. He righted the airplane, climbed back up to altitude and got us on course. Then he asked what was happening, and I told him that he was looking outside way too much and not enough on the instruments.

So he locked onto the panel. But within only a few minutes, although he was still in control, he asked if I could take over. He was visibly sweating although it was cool in the airplane. He admitted, "This is just too much work!" So I took over and let him relax for awhile.

About 20 minutes out of Laramie, the clouds parted, and I had him take over. But I couldn't have created a better learning experience for him, to discourage playing games with poor visibility. Had I not been there to see what he was doing and get him to get onto the guages, there is little doubt that the airplane would have crashed.

So while the theory is good, just look at the instruments, the reality is that it doesn't happen, and people die.

Cary
Cary offline
User avatar
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:49 pm
Location: Fort Collins, CO
"I have slipped the surly bonds of earth..., put out my hand and touched the face of God." J.G. Magee

Re: 178 seconds

Cary wrote:
You don't need an IR to realize that if you can't see outside, to pay attention inside!
But that is exactly what doesn't happen. Instead of gluing to the instruments, VFR pilots encountering IMC invariably continue to try to maintain control by looking outside.

I've described this situation so many times that I might have done so here, too, and if so, forgive the repetitiveness. My first start-to-finish student was a good stick, and he'd already had his 3 hours of required hood time, but no actual. He could navigate well, he did well on unusual attitude recovery, etc. He had voiced more than once that he didn't see what the big deal was, flying on instruments.

He wanted to take his long dual to Jackson, so with his wife in the back seat, we set off on the usual route from Laramie, via Medicine Bow, Riverton, etc. But northwest of Riverton, the route was getting socked in. He asked if we could file IFR, but I explained that there was no way to get a 172 with 3 aboard up to the MEA of 14,000'. He finally turned us around as the vis narrowed down, I took over and told him to plot the route to Casper, and then he flew us there, where we had lunch. While there, I filed IFR back to Laramie, anticipating we'd run into some of what made us turn around earlier.

Soon after crossing Casper Mountain, we were in and out of the clouds. After only a short time, we were a-kilter off to the left. I tapped the AI, and he immediately corrected, but a few minutes later, it happened again. After tapping the AI again and he corrected, I called Center and got a block altitude and advised that we'd likely divert from the centerline of the airway, because this was a training flight. He couldn't hear me, because this was olden times--we weren't using headsets and an intercom.

In only a couple minutes, we were into a diving left turn. This time I let it go while we lost several hundred feet and turned nearly 180 degrees, before tapping him on the shoulder and asking him where we were going. He righted the airplane, climbed back up to altitude and got us on course. Then he asked what was happening, and I told him that he was looking outside way too much and not enough on the instruments.

So he locked onto the panel. But within only a few minutes, although he was still in control, he asked if I could take over. He was visibly sweating although it was cool in the airplane. He admitted, "This is just too much work!" So I took over and let him relax for awhile.

About 20 minutes out of Laramie, the clouds parted, and I had him take over. But I couldn't have created a better learning experience for him, to discourage playing games with poor visibility. Had I not been there to see what he was doing and get him to get onto the guages, there is little doubt that the airplane would have crashed.

So while the theory is good, just look at the instruments, the reality is that it doesn't happen, and people die.

Cary
Nosedragger offline
Posts: 975
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 6:40 am
Location: SE Idaho
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... ACzcbTgqlT

Re: 178 seconds

Good point Cary. I'm almost convinced that the above average pilots are more vulnerable. The ones that react quickly to inputs they're sensing with the "fly the plane!" mantra pounding in their head. The not so competent ones might be more likely to say hmm, I seem to be f-ing something up again, I better focus on my ai for a minute while I sort this out.

I'm still struggling with the transition time, it's hard to settle in from visual to instruments and worse from instruments to visual, I have less than stellar landings bobbing up from the panel at 200 agl trying to get my bearings again to land.
Nosedragger offline
Posts: 975
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 6:40 am
Location: SE Idaho
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... ACzcbTgqlT

Re: 178 seconds

Made the mistake once. The trouble is that after a few hundred hours or so of time you start to get some confidence and sometimes this confidence is misplaced.
I was flying under some scattered clouds one day in fairly decent conditions when up ahead the scattered made way into solid overcast and below there was a low layer of thin foggy cloud. My misplaced confidence kicked in and also the get there itis because afterall I was only 20 mi from my destination.
About 5 minutes later the layers merged and now I was in IMC. With only the 5 hrs of mandatory hood time under my belt, it was a genuine Oh F__k moment.
I don't know whether it was luck, the good lord or whatever, but I did manage to keep my head and kept focused on the instruments despite the doubts creeping into my head with external forces making me think I was going right when I was actually going left. I managed the rate one turn 180 degrees and the next 5-10 minutes of my life were pure hell, and then pure ecstasy when I finally broke through into clear skies.

Thanks for the reminder. It is truly not the place you want to be as an inexperienced (or experienced) pilot. Take it from a dummy who tried it once.
AndyH offline
User avatar
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:03 pm
Location: Manitoba
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... 9RQBq9lKRF
--------------------------------
1998 Murphy Rebel on Floats

Re: 178 seconds

I got IFR ticket some 40+ years ago - not current as of now , only fly in VFR conditions now. Had too many close calls - and I don't fly at night unless it's within a area I know extremely well. I once flew into thunder storm at night over Grand Canyon really bad . IFR departure is OK as long as you can out climb above the terrian and get on top--approaches are done with autopilot and linked super GPS ,but not for me.
182 STOL driver offline
Posts: 1529
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:27 pm

Re: 178 seconds

I like your way of thinking Bill.
gbflyer offline
User avatar
Posts: 2317
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:35 pm
Location: SE Alaska

Re: 178 seconds

There is a reason that insurance rates go down by 10%-25% when you add an instrument rating to your ticket. I am a much safer pilot having received the instrument training that I have thus far. I have my instrument checkride scheduled for the end of April. Enjoying this training immensely.

I made the mistake of VFR in to IMC once in my Cessna 170 with about 55 hours total time logged. Thought I was in a straight ahead wings level climb, looked at my airspeed and AI, and realized that I was extremely confused about which way was up. Ended up VFR on top of a solid overcast layer over rugged terrain. Didn't find a hole to descend through until I had about 10 minutes of fuel on board. It was a horrible flight, except that it taught me so much! Never again in the 12 years since then.
Scolopax offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 1696
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Nottingham
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... 4aYqSexnZC

Re: 178 seconds

I agree with the insurance companies that having an instrument rating helps in marginal weather. There exceptions, however, like the Pretend VMC that MTV has written an article about and pipeline flying. When the mission is visual reconnaissance, getting lower often is safer than getting higher. It is the transition from one to the other that can kill you.

Instrument and contact are two very different and unrelated worlds. Instrument requires planning ahead and staying ahead of the airplane. It allows very little maneuvering flight. It requires flying high enough to miss obstacles and terrain. It requires an instrument approach or often a long flight to VMC. Contact allows for maneuvering flight and missing obstacles and terrain laterally. It allows immediate landing in a safe landing zone. Generally, the lower we fly the better the visibility.

Years ago, Cessna had a good plan inadvertent IMC in their operating manual (before POH was required.) It advised non-instrument pilots to release the control wheel and use rudder only to make an approximate 180 degree turn to go back the way they had come. They allowed for slight throttle use to maintain altitude.

When low, we may need to stay low and go back or land. When high, or when we can safely get high on instruments, we need to get up and get organized solely by reference to instruments, like Cary says.
contactflying offline
Posts: 4972
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:36 pm
Location: Aurora, Missouri 2H2
Download my free "https://tinyurl.com/Safe-Maneuvering" e-book.

DISPLAY OPTIONS

19 postsPage 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base