Backcountry Pilot • 7680' base - $35k budget

7680' base - $35k budget

Technical and practical discussion about specific aircraft types such as Cessna 180, Maule M7, et al. Please read and search carefully before posting, as many popular topics have already been discussed.
50 postsPage 3 of 31, 2, 3

Re: 7680' base - $35k budget

Don’t forget the PA-22/20 Pacer conversion. There out there and cheep. For $20K $35K you can get some very nice planes. The 150HP and 160HP will out perform most 172s. There simple and very functional. Eddie Trimmer up in Alaska has many mods to make them great back country airplanes.

Rick
pacerpilot offline
User avatar
Posts: 199
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:48 pm
Location: Kernville, calif.
Aircraft: PA-22/20

Re: 7680' base - $35k budget

I agree about the Pacers! While i don't have any experience with the wing extensions (which i'm sure are great) i've heard great things about the performance with just a little more wing. But don't underestimate a true shortwing either! I fly a '57 22/20 with the 150 hp o-320. I haven't had it on many unimproved strips, but the altitude performance is surprisingly good when kept light. Just yesterday i quickly got up from my homebase on the frontrange (KLMO @ 5055msl) to 14000 to explore around rocky mtn national park and longs peak. It was just me, but almost full fuel and i climbed at over 1200 fpm initially followed by about 600fpm when i reached 14. There are a couple other pacers in the area and i heard a rumor that a couple guys have some with wing extensions and o-360's over in kremmling.
kevbot offline
User avatar
Posts: 215
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:46 pm
Location: Tehachapi

Re: 7680' base - $35k budget

coloradokevbot wrote:I agree about the Pacers! While i don't have any experience with the wing extensions (which i'm sure are great) i've heard great things about the performance with just a little more wing. But don't underestimate a true shortwing either! I fly a '57 22/20 with the 150 hp o-320. I haven't had it on many unimproved strips, but the altitude performance is surprisingly good when kept light. Just yesterday i quickly got up from my homebase on the frontrange (KLMO @ 5055msl) to 14000 to explore around rocky mtn national park and longs peak. It was just me, but almost full fuel and i climbed at over 1200 fpm initially followed by about 600fpm when i reached 14. There are a couple other pacers in the area and i heard a rumor that a couple guys have some with wing extensions and o-360's over in kremmling.


Wow, that is good performance. This is what I was looking for when I started this thread.. real world experience.
29singlespeed offline
Posts: 508
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:10 pm
Location: Gunnison

Re: 7680' base - $35k budget

Real world experience: Two guys in a standard wing 150hp pa-20 out of Marble on an Oct morning trip. 1/2 fuel, no bags. Burned up most of the runway and just barely cleared the trees at the west end. I was the pax, neither of us have been back in a Pacer since.
flynbeekeeper offline
Posts: 372
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 8:01 pm
Location: southern colorado
Tom

Re: 7680' base - $35k budget

I do get pretty good performance out of the pacer, but it is pretty sensitive to weight. With me and my instructor the best climb we ever really saw was just under 1000 fpm but usually it was closer to 700 fpm. It is really pretty forgiving on approach speeds, but climb rates do change fairly dramatically if the climb speed varies. The ground roll really depends on weight and technique, generally I keep tail low with one notch of flaps and let it fly off, but if you're near gross, it seems to take a long time.
kevbot offline
User avatar
Posts: 215
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:46 pm
Location: Tehachapi

Re: 7680' base - $35k budget

Hey COKev, bring that Pacer out to our fly-in this Saturday. Not only do I dig pacers, I want to be impressed! I believe a few others are coming from Longtown too, we'll even feed you pancakes. :)

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=8160
mountainmatt offline
User avatar
Posts: 2803
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 2:43 pm
Location: Colorful Colorado
FlyingPoochProductions
FlyColorado.org

Re: 7680' base - $35k budget

flynbeekeeper wrote:Real world experience: Two guys in a standard wing 150hp pa-20 out of Marble on an Oct morning trip. 1/2 fuel, no bags. Burned up most of the runway and just barely cleared the trees at the west end. I was the pax, neither of us have been back in a Pacer since.

That is the reality. Gutless means long groundrolls, and long exposures with the wind. Your technique will get a workout, and you will get the experience you're looking for.

Gump
GumpAir offline
User avatar
Posts: 4557
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:14 am
Location: Lost somewhere in Nevada
Aircraft: Old Clunker

Re: 7680' base - $35k budget

Just to clarify, that "technique" i mentioned was from my personal experience and particular plane. :D I don't want to offend any other pilots on their ways, because i sure know that i could always use some help improving mine!
kevbot offline
User avatar
Posts: 215
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:46 pm
Location: Tehachapi

7680' base - $35k budget

This thread topic is several months old, so thinking optimistically, the original poster should have a few more duckies saved.

In that case, he may want to check out a great looking 2009 Murphy Rebel for sale at macdonaldaircraft.com for 45K.


---
I am here: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=40.975888,-73.487349
WingsOverPalawan offline
User avatar
Posts: 352
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 1:36 pm
Location: Puerto Princesa, Palawan, Philippines
Ridge Runner
Model 3

Re: 7680' base - $35k budget

What about buying the 182 and continuing to rent the super cub?
porterjet offline
User avatar
Posts: 776
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:37 am
Location: San Luis Obispo
John
KSBP

DISPLAY OPTIONS

Previous
50 postsPage 3 of 31, 2, 3

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base