The difference, after slipping down to short final, is that the nose will be higher with the same airspeed and Vso will be different. That said, we are not touching down slowly and softly at Vso. We are touching down slowly and softly at whatever airspeed will just barely support the weight at one inch ground effect.
We get slow the same way as with 40 degrees of flap on the later Cessnas. We pitch up on short final enough to create a good sink. Pitch attitude will be much higher in the 170A, but the rounded windscreen with the round fuselage allows pretty good visibility ahead and down. We are aiming, with rudder and throttle only (aileron will screw this up), at the numbers (desired touchdown spot exactly, exactly.) Rudder maintains longitudinal alignment (and keeps the wing level at the same time) and throttle movement directs us down the desired glide angle and manages rate of descent to touchdown. Exactly same thing in a crosswind with the wing in stabilized bank into the crosswind (use aileron to maintain wing bank angle but not, absolutely not, to direct the nose down the centerline. That is a rudder only job. Throttle and engine power, perhaps lots, to touchdown. If we have to round out and close the throttle we are going too fast, even in a 170A or Citabria. Hold off with elevator controlling speed (which it does very well) and altitude (which it does very poorly) is not a short field technique.
Welcome, by the way. So no problem with the airplane. Pilot needs to learn power/pitch deceleration on short final to touchdown well below Vso on the numbers consistently for short off field operations. Read Safe Maneuvering Flight Techniques for the apparent brisk walk rate of closure approach. Email me
[email protected]. It is free.