Backcountry Pilot • cessna 206 IO-540

cessna 206 IO-540

Have you modified your aircraft? STC? STOL Kit? Major rebuild from just a data plate?
25 postsPage 2 of 21, 2

Re: cessna 206 IO-540

Skydive206 wrote:What did the exchange weight come in at for that conversion? IO-520 vs TSIO-540. TSIO-520 vs. TSIO-540.


Nit-Picking here....but, Lycoming engines do not use the "S" designation in their Turbocharged engines. The Turbo Charged 540 is a "TIO--540" not a "TSIO-540", which does not exist as far as I know.

Flame suit on.... :lol:

MTV
mtv offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 10514
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Bozeman

Re: cessna 206 IO-540

Cessna went out of production of light aircraft for a number of years. When they went back into production (and the 206 was the first or second to go back into production), ALL their piston engine airplanes went to Lycoming engines. So, the newer 206s all have either IO-540s or TIO-540s.

The simple reason for this change? The same company owns Cessna and Lycoming. Duh, why use the competition's motors?

So, IF you are running or can find a later model 206, it will be Lycoming equipped, and same for 182s, 172s, etc.

But, if you have a 1985 or earlier 206 you're going to have to live with either a Continental engine, a Soloy Turbine Pack, or (maybe) a TIO-540 conversion that is a REAL mess. Remove the top cowl of one of those, and you still can't see any part of the engine.....they are equipped with a plenum for cooling.....if that tells you anything. The engine compartment is absolutely CRAMMED full. Would be a nightmare to work on. But, 350 honest horsepower.

The Soloy turbine conversion has buckets of power. Two big issues: Burns lots of fuel, which implies you need more fuel capacity in the plane or REALLY short legs, and bring Cubic Dollars to the dance, cause that's what they cost.

Otherwise, I'd go with an IO-550N Continental, read the operating instructions, and get the prop balanced.

MTV
mtv offline
Knowledge Base Author
User avatar
Posts: 10514
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:47 am
Location: Bozeman

Re: cessna 206 IO-540

Yep, what MTV said above.

Kurt
G44 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:46 am
Location: Michigan

Re: cessna 206 IO-540

Well, I have actually owned two Soloy converted aircraft. Fuel burn is 22 gal an hour, 5 gal more than a TC aircraft (17), but at a much higher IAS (152 kts). So its specific fuel consumption is not all that higher, but burning a fuel that is $1 cheaper per gallon and available worldwide. Now the conversion comes with additional fuel capacity in wing and Soloy's STOL mods. So gets in much slower & shorter, goes actually further in range than a TC aircraft at a higher IAS. I would routinely cruise non-stop from Miami to La Ceiba Honduras at 22,000'. Not going to get that from a regular T206. Yes, bring buckets of money, but I only paid $135,000 for my second one (some parts required). You just have to love sea level to 10,000' in 4 minutes after a 600' ground roll. Turbines really do not mind running at the top of the green arc, so no having to lean out and you can come down like a rock, since shock cowling is not an issue. Having Beta is kind of a plus on a seaplane as well.

I really do like the installation of the Lycoming much better in the H model. Yes Cessna owns them, but it really is much cleaner install and it has needed far less maintenance than my Continental equipped ones did (G models). Just winging the price, I would say if you have to buy engine (550N), install kit and STC you are in the low six figure range. Aside from the issue, you will most likely come up with a prop incompatibility issue, which would increase the price a bit. An issue you may find with an equivalent Lycoming conversion as well. One issue with the 550N is an issue with cowl interference, so I think any 550N STC would necessitate a cowling mod as well. The cowling on the Lycoming install in the H model is different as well. All conversions start you down a rabbit hole. When you change the cowl, you need to re-do the spin testing, which means more costs. So the STC and the kit costs more.

Most times, engine conversions of any kind do not tend to be reflected in the sale price when you decide to sell the aircraft. So you will not come out ahead on any conversion. There is also one other side effect of conversions, when you sell; you have to sell your airplane and the conversion at the same time. So it makes it just a bit more complicated to sell from a marketing standpoint.

So many tradeoffs and benefits. Choose wisely Professor Jones.
dogpilot offline
Took ball and went home
Posts: 902
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:20 pm
Aircraft: Cessna 206H Amphib, Caravan 675 Amphib

Re: cessna 206 IO-540

Yes I’m interested in that mod
PngPilot offline
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2021 10:35 am
Location: Clayfield
Aircraft: C206

DISPLAY OPTIONS

Previous
25 postsPage 2 of 21, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base