
Mapleflt wrote:At the risk of sound very "hotrodish" (I'm sure that's a real word) its been suggested that gains are had by including a "port & polish" application to the jugs, thoughts anyone !!!!
Mapleflt wrote:The work plan includes:
Top overhaul, with higher compression pistons and associated bits & pieces (pins, rings etc)
Ported intakes (no polishing allowed)
Electronic ignition (to help with better timing etc)
Acorn exhaust ( and any required carburetor adjustments)
Can anyone suggest other power or engine efficiency enhancements ?
Cheers,

Mapleflt wrote:Agreed, one of the first "upgrades" I did last year was a Catto prop, very happy with it they are a great company to deal with
Bagarre wrote:Mapleflt wrote:Agreed, one of the first "upgrades" I did last year was a Catto prop, very happy with it they are a great company to deal with
A Catto prop on a Cessna 170.
That's it, I'm moving to Canada.
hotrod180 wrote:Bagarre wrote:Mapleflt wrote:Agreed, one of the first "upgrades" I did last year was a Catto prop, very happy with it they are a great company to deal with
A Catto prop on a Cessna 170.
That's it, I'm moving to Canada.
Check the C170 TCDS #A-799.
Under data pertinant to all models:
item #1 propeller ( b) Sensenich 73BR-50 *or any other fixed pitch wood*.
http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guida ... Rev_55.pdf
This is the loophole (or whatever you want to call it) that lots of people seem to use as a "basis of approval" to install Catto props on their Cubs etc. A friend of mine hung one on his Luscombe based on a similar item in the Luscombe TCDS.
Your IA and / or his PMI may or may not agree with it.
Mapleflt wrote:I guess it likely that the various "cub" variants are in fact experimental themselves. I'll hold off sending you the real estate listing for Canada
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest