Backcountry Pilot • FS: (NOT) 1953 Cessna 170B

FS: (NOT) 1953 Cessna 170B

Gear for sale, gear wanted, etc. Be sure to read the Required Reading sticky before posting.
40 postsPage 2 of 21, 2

Re: FS: (NOT) 1953 Cessna 170B

If you change your mind again, call me first...
littlewheelinback offline
User avatar
Posts: 331
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:03 pm
Location: Bellingham, WA

Re: NOT For Sale: 1953 Cessna 170B

robw56 wrote:I'll give you a hint though... with full tanks it will still haul over 1000lbs :D .


Well that narrows it down. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Scolopax offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 1716
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Nottingham
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... 4aYqSexnZC

Re: FS: (NOT) 1953 Cessna 170B

Zzz wrote:You should sell it, buy a house, and watch from the comfort of your office as the new buyer has a shitload of fun in it while you prepare to mow the lawn and build a new fence.



Haha, a post for the bcp history books!
highroad offline
User avatar
Posts: 785
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:28 am
Location: Southern Oregon Coast
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... SBWeUVDhQd
Aircraft: A Maule we call X-ray

Re: NOT For Sale: 1953 Cessna 170B

robw56 wrote:...with full tanks it will still haul over 1000lbs :D .


The plane I'm looking at is the same way. I'm having a hard time with the idea that the useful load in the potential new plane is almost equal to the total gross weight of my Luscombe :shock: I can't wait to do something dumb like fill it up with kayak gear and head for Loon Creek just because I can.
whee offline
User avatar
Posts: 3386
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 1:59 pm
Location: SE Idaho

Re: FS: (NOT) 1953 Cessna 170B

I feel for ya, Rob. One day I'm dead certain I need to get a 185, then the next day I've talked myself into a 180, then the day after that I'm positive I need to upgrade the engine in my 170B. Learning a heap about airframes and powerplants and props, at least! :lol:

-DP
denalipilot offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2793
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: Denali
Aircraft: C-170B+

Re: FS: (NOT) 1953 Cessna 170B

Zzz wrote:You should sell it, buy a house, and watch from the comfort of your office as the new buyer has a shitload of fun in it while you prepare to mow the lawn and build a new fence.


You need to implement "like" buttons.
svanarts offline
User avatar
Posts: 1393
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Aircraft: 7AC (65HP) Aeronca Champ (borrowed horse)
Six Chuter Skye Ryder Powered Parachute

Re: FS: (NOT) 1953 Cessna 170B

denalipilot wrote:I feel for ya, Rob. One day I'm dead certain I need to get a 185, then the next day I've talked myself into a 180, then the day after that I'm positive I need to upgrade the engine in my 170B. Learning a heap about airframes and powerplants and props, at least! :lol:

-DP


HA that sounds a lot like me. :lol:
robw56 offline
User avatar
Posts: 3263
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:30 pm
Location: Ward
Aircraft: 1957 C-180A

Re: NOT For Sale: 1953 Cessna 170B

robw56 wrote:
TomW wrote:#-o Whow, that was close.
Start trying to pry your way into some stick time in the type of plane you want to upgrade to. I'm pretty blessed with lots of friends with lots of different types of planes that allow me to fly them, and some pretty cool types to boot.
Truth is, it's always nice to get back in the 170, partially cause it fits like a well broke in glove, but it's just so nice and light on the controls, simple, inexpensive (as far as airplanes go) and on and on...... Remember, most of them do many things well, but usually don't do any specific thing great!
I was excited to see what you guy's were gunna upgrade into though.
Good luck.
By the way, I received your package in the mail the other day. :shock:
Thanks,
Tom


Glad you got the package, Tom.

I've heard more than a few people regret selling there 170s, I don't want that to happen to me. Keeping the 170 won't cost us anything since it is completely paid for. That and the fact I've put bout 10k into modifications for it that i will never get back help in the decision to keep it. It's still a really great plane that we will still have a lot of fun flying. We still want to get another plane with more useful load and that's better suited for long cross country flights but is still capable in the backcountry (who doesn't want two airplanes anyways :D ). I have something I'm working on right now but the timing just might not work out. I won't say what it is so I don't turn anyone else onto the deal. I'll give you a hint though... with full tanks it will still haul over 1000lbs :D .



I was lucky enough to be able to buy out my dad's partner in the 1953 170B I got my ticket in only to have my dad want to sell it.He hated all the AD's (the only one I remember was the carb float issue)so we started building a Murphy Rebel,that didn't get far as day to day stuff just seems to get in the way. I really missed the 170 so we ended up buying a 1960 150 straight tail,awesome fun little honda civic of airplanes. we now have a 1958 180 and all I can say is I can't believe how capable this aircraft is. :D .Soo I think you may want to do what Bigrenna did,buy a 180 and put all your goodies on it,or wait a few weeks until his airplane is done and buy that one.I 'm thinking he might be ready for a 195 project,more room for MEK fumes. :lol: Just kidding Greg can't wait to see that awesome machine this summer.
.
VT180 offline
User avatar
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:43 pm
Location: Vermont

Re: FS: (NOT) 1953 Cessna 170B

Move closer to Sac, sell the plane, buy a 180, join our group, then you will be able to fly a bunch of shit! And I will get to fly a 180 :D

No but seriously, join our group.

Kidding (sort of).

Good luck with whatever you guys decide.

Hey, we need a West Circuit day soon! Or even a Sierra N/S Circuit. Any circuit!
emflys offline
User avatar
Posts: 1039
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:16 pm
Location: Folsom, CA

Re: FS: (NOT) 1953 Cessna 170B

Withdrawals getting to you Emmet?
svanarts offline
User avatar
Posts: 1393
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Modesto, CA
Aircraft: 7AC (65HP) Aeronca Champ (borrowed horse)
Six Chuter Skye Ryder Powered Parachute

Re: FS: (NOT) 1953 Cessna 170B

Withdrawals getting to you Emmet?


I hope not.

Just because I am still learning to fly that plane and have not come to grips with the thought of selling my TCraft - the new owner is getting attached to Emmet's former ride.
DCO-65 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 3:55 pm
Location: Portland, OR
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... 6b98KGsYbF

Re: NOT For Sale: 1953 Cessna 170B

VT180 wrote:I think you may want to do what Bigrenna did,buy a 180 and put all your goodies on it,or wait a few weeks until his airplane is done and buy that one.I 'm thinking he might be ready for a 195 project,more room for MEK fumes. :lol: Just kidding Greg can't wait to see that awesome machine this summer.
.


Geeze I hope that's not the case. I cant see starting over again. Gonna stick with the Skywagon I think! (Hopefully thats where you are headed Rob!)
Bigrenna offline
KB and Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 2358
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 4:02 pm
Location: New England
Aircraft: C180H / C170B
www.bushwagoneast.com

Re: FS: (NOT) 1953 Cessna 170B

Did you have the Sportsman kit put on and if so how much did it cost and how long did it take?
littlewheelinback offline
User avatar
Posts: 331
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:03 pm
Location: Bellingham, WA

Re: FS: (NOT) 1953 Cessna 170B

littlewheelinback wrote:Did you have the Sportsman kit put on and if so how much did it cost and how long did it take?


I had the Sportsman STOL kit put on in April of last year. The install was completed in 2 weekends and it cost me $1000. That price is not very typical however.
robw56 offline
User avatar
Posts: 3263
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:30 pm
Location: Ward
Aircraft: 1957 C-180A

Re: FS: (NOT) 1953 Cessna 170B

robw56 wrote:
littlewheelinback wrote:Did you have the Sportsman kit put on and if so how much did it cost and how long did it take?


I had the Sportsman STOL kit put on in April of last year. The install was completed in 2 weekends and it cost me $1000. That price is not very typical however.


Don't forget the price of the kit plus shipping!
Glidergeek offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 1944
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 8:02 pm
Location: Hesperia
Aircraft: 1968 P206C
DG 400

Re: FS: (NOT) 1953 Cessna 170B

I figured he was just asking the cost of installation. Anyone can go on Stene's site and see that the kit is $1,995.
robw56 offline
User avatar
Posts: 3263
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:30 pm
Location: Ward
Aircraft: 1957 C-180A

Re: FS: (NOT) 1953 Cessna 170B

Thanks...I was just wondering bout labor and how long it took. I am actively shopping for a C-170B and if I get one without the kit, I am going to put it on.
littlewheelinback offline
User avatar
Posts: 331
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:03 pm
Location: Bellingham, WA

Re: FS: (NOT) 1953 Cessna 170B

This is from Stene Aviations website: What is the average installation time? For an individual who has not installed the kit before the installation takes 40-50hours without paint. Experienced installers on average take 30-40hours.
robw56 offline
User avatar
Posts: 3263
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:30 pm
Location: Ward
Aircraft: 1957 C-180A

Re: FS: (NOT) 1953 Cessna 170B

mountainmatt wrote:
Zzz wrote:You should sell it, buy a house, and watch from the comfort of your office as the new buyer has a shitload of fun in it while you prepare to mow the lawn and build a new fence.


Now that's funny! :lol: #-o


That is classical!
csstricker offline
User avatar
Posts: 67
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 4:18 pm
Location: Ogden, UT
FindMeSpot URL: http://share.findmespot.com/shared/face ... HSiQDWEYn1

Re: NOT For Sale: 1953 Cessna 170B

VT180 wrote:..........I was lucky enough to be able to buy out my dad's partner in the 1953 170B I got my ticket in only to have my dad want to sell it.He hated all the AD's (the only one I remember was the carb float issue)so we started building a Murphy Rebel,........


"All the AD's" ? Of course, being a cerificated airplane, the C170 is subject to AD's, but I owned a ragwing 170 for many years and abou the only recurring AD's I remember were for the fuel pump screen (specific to the 1948 ragwing model) and for the seat tracks. There were quite a few one-time AD's for both the engine and the airframe but nothing too onerous as i recall. Lots of them were simple, like disconnecting or fusing the wiring to the cigar lighter.
hotrod180 offline
Supporter
User avatar
Posts: 10600
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:47 pm
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Cessna Skywagon -- accept no substitute!

DISPLAY OPTIONS

Previous
40 postsPage 2 of 21, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Latest Features

Latest Knowledge Base