Class E wrote:Everyone has heard the saying “there’s nothing more expensive than a cheap airplane,” but what exactly were they talking about?
In your experience, what were the actual maintenance items on your cheap airplane that appeared post-purchase?
Or was it simply upgrades? Curious what you wish you had budgeted for.
I always say to prospective airplane owners - you don't need to be rich, but you don't want to be cheap.
Buying a plane from someone who cheapskated through years of maintenance, which is possible to do if you have the right mechanic connections, can be a nightmare. You will likely find yourself playing catch up on MX instead of flying the plane, which is probably what you actually bought it to do.
Another factor is that there are desirable models, which fetch a higher cost on the market, vs less desirable models, which have earned a reputation for being not so great for some reason or another.
Horsepower, lift, speed, range, durability, reliability and payload are major factors when evaluating an airplane purchase. The models that exhibit reasonably decent levels on these points of criteria are typically not cheap. That means that cheap airplanes are typically short on one or many of these desirable characteristics. Discovering your airplanes shortcomings is flight can be quite expensive...
I used to fly around the higher backcountry in a very underpowered airplane. It taught me some great lessons in energy management, but operating with wider safety margins is worth the extra money in my opinion. You get tired of learning lessons the hard way - barely clearing the trees, using 90% of the runway, not being able to climb, etc...
Backcountry flying is not a low cost endeavor. If you are pinching pennies, RC might be a better choice
