Wed Apr 06, 2016 11:34 pm
Ok...I may have come off a little rude with my negative sentiments toward attorneys. Carry, I understand your position in defending attorneys, being that you are one, as I will defend my position being a technician. You seem like a standup person and the fact that you're on backcountry pilot makes you a good person because we share the same interest.
That being said, let's get back to the meat of this conversation. I personally feel that the topic of owner maintenance really isn't for BCP and should probably be on pilots of America, CPA, or something of that nature. Reason being, this forum is rittled with non-certificated mechanics (pilots) asking for information on how to perform maintenance tasks outside of the allowed guidelines spelled out in the FARs on certified aircraft, largely because they are backcountry pilots who should be knowledgable of their aircraft and prepared to make necessary repairs When absolutely needed in order to get home.
When it comes to owner assisted annuals, like I said before, they are a privilege I allow to a select few customers, for whatever reason. Their tasks are outlined, they aren't signing anything off, and it is perfectly legal to allow them to assist with maintenance as long as they are supervised. That being said, let's not compare owner-assisted annuals to "through the fence annuals or through the fence mechanics" who pencil whip annuals and maintenance. I feel that I can help owners become familiar with their aircraft through assisted maintenance. It's beneficial to them as pilots to understand systems and have the ability to make informed decisions in the event of mechanical issues both preflight and in flight.
Going back to the article, as a professional aircraft technician, the last thing I need is to take someone's opinion on how to decipher the regs. In my position, I need to be able to read the regs, interpret them, make a decision, and be prepared to accept the outcome of my decision and provide data to support it. I don't know how many times I've seen minor repairs be called major repairs because inspectors err on the side of caution rather than do their due diligence and see it for what it is. Let's face it, the Feds can't even come to agreement between different fsdo's when it comes to interpreting regs, approving 145, and 135 opps manuals....
Ben