Sat Jul 04, 2015 12:09 pm
I don't know if this is doable or applies, but according to my son the engineer (actually, both sons are engineers, so No. 1 Son), a significant amount of weight could be saved if the pilot would go on a diet. He's right. I'd still be pretty healthy if I knocked off 35 lbs.
As those here who've camped with me know, I tend to be a glamper--I pretty much carry the house with me. Also, my airplane is pretty well equipped for a P172D, and all that weighs, too. So instead of trying to pear down all that, when I'm going to go into a relatively short, high DA strip, I plan my fuel to be sufficient to get in there fairly light and go out to the nearest refueling stop with a safe reserve. For instance, from Greeley to LaGarita via LaVeta Pass and Alamosa, it's about 2 1/2 hours, and I stop at Alamosa for a potty break before going on to LaGarita. My airplane holds 52 gallons, with 5 unusable in level flight, 10 unusable in maneuvering flight. At 9.8 gph average, I figure I've burned 25 gallons by the time I land at LaGarita, leaving me 27 - 10, 17 gallons to safely fly back to Alamosa 37 miles away with still more than an hour's reserve. I could probably get away with even less, but it works out pretty well.
I think paring the weight as you describe, or as MTV suggests, isn't a bad thing, but for me, I like having the electrical system and electric starter, as well as my avionics. I haven't hand-propped this airplane, although I've hand-propped several others years ago. I've never been "bitten" by hand-propping, but frankly, I just don't like to do it, no matter how safely it can be done. To me, it's an emergency issue if it's necessary. To some extent, my airplane was put on a diet when the engine was installed, as I had an alternator conversion and light weight starter installed--and I believe that saved something like 26 lbs--both were heavy clunky ol' things.
Just my 2c, FWIW.
Cary